퇴계 리학에 대한 사계의 비판과 비판적 계승

Abstract

This paper considers Sa-gye Kim Jang-saeng’s critique on Toe-gye’s study of principle as the viewpoint of the critical succession of that. It is true that the academic world has dealt with the thoughts of the main characters of each school in a state of being too hard on the confrontation between the Toe-gye school and the Yul-gok school. This can be attributed to the fact that they were dealing with their scholarship and ideas from the standpoint of politics. Now it is time to think about the appearance of the head of state by looking at aspects of mutual critical succession beyond the view of the struggle. This is intended to look at the process of academic mutual progress away from the consumptiveness study from the point of view of the struggle. Kim Jang-saeng succeeded the scholarship of Song Ik-pil and Yi Yi and put it on the new generation Kim Jib, Song Si-yeol, and Song Joon-gil. In particular, his teaching of the study of the rituals has played an important role in upgrading the preaching of the Joseon Dynasty to a higher level as well as the Yul-gok school’s. The aspect of the study of Chinese Classics has also elevated the level of reinterpretation of the meaning of the scriptures in the neo-confucianism context beyond the stage of interpreting the literature of the scriptures in terms of the history of Joseon dynasty. However, many of his works have been made by critically examining the study of rituals, the study of Chinese classics, the study of principle of the Toe-gye Yi-hwang, Therefore,in this paper, I tried to examine his study and thought through the readings of critical succession in the viewpoint of succession. This is due to the attitude of paying attention to the side of helping each other while recognizing conflicts among schools.