Effects of Government’s Regulations on Private Education Expenditures in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The private education market has been expanding in Korea. Hence, various measures at the government level are implemented, such as regulating private educational institutes and strengthening school curricula at all levels. This paper analyzes whether direct regulation on the business hours of private educational institutes is effective in reducing the country’s overall private education expenditure. Using the youth panel data of the Korea Employment Information Service from 2007 to 2010, the paper focuses on the regulation of private educational institutes and analyzes the regulation effect on private education expenditures of Korean high school students using Tobit model. Furthermore, the stochastic dominance test is conducted by taking the nonparametric approach of Linton et al. (2010). Regulation effects in both approaches vary among the regulated regions.
Abstract
The private education market has been expanding in Korea. Hence, various measures at the government level are implemented, such as regulating private educational institutes and strengthening school curricula at all levels. This paper analyzes whether direct regulation on the business hours of private educational institutes is effective in reducing the country’s overall private education expenditure. Using the youth panel data of the Korea Employment Information Service from 2007 to 2010, the paper focuses on the regulation of private educational institutes and analyzes the regulation effect on private education expenditures of Korean high school students using Tobit model. Furthermore, the stochastic dominance test is conducted by taking the nonparametric approach of Linton et al. (2010). Regulation effects in both approaches vary among the regulated regions.
참고문헌 (14)
- Ai, C., "Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models", Economics Letters, 80(1), pp.123~129 (2003)
- Barrett, G., "Consistent Tests for Stochastic Dominance", Econometrica, 71(1), pp.71~104 (2003)
- Bray, T. M., "Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Implications for Policy Makers in Asia" (2012), Asian Development Bank
- Choi, J. S., "Private Tutoring and Educational Inequality: Evidence from a Dynamic Model of Academic Achievement in Korea", Population Association of America Annual Meeting (2012)
- Does Money Matter? The Effect of Private Educational Expenditures on Academic Performance, "Kang", National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, ~, pp.National University of Singapore, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 704 (2007)
- 김대일, "Growth in College Education and Wage Differentials in Korea", Seoul Journal of Economics, 18(2), pp.87~123 (2005), 경제연구소
- 김지하, "학원교습시간 규제의 사교육 수요경감 효과 분석 -사교육비와 사교육 시간을 중심으로-", 교육행정학연구, 27(4), pp.465~487 (2009), 한국교육행정학회
- 김지하, "Do governmental regulations for cram schools decrease the number of hours students spend on private tutoring?", KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(1), pp.3~21 (2010), 한국교육개발원
- Kim, S., "Private Tutoring and Demand for Education in South Korea", Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), pp.259~296 (2010)
- Diagnosis and Policy on the Reduction Policy of Private Tutoring Cost, "Kim, S. N.", Korean Educational Development Institute, ~ (2011)
- 이종구, "사교육비 지출 패턴과 경감정책의 효과분석 - Tobit Model과 Heckman Selection Model의 활용 -", 한국교육, 36(2), pp.189~221 (2009), 한국교육개발원
- Linton, O, "An Improved Bootstrap Test of Stochastic Dominance", Journal of Econometrics, 154(2), pp.186~202 (2010)
- Tansel, A, "Private Tutoring Expenditures in Turkey", Economics of Education Review, 25(3), pp.13~ (2006)
- The Survey of Private Education Expenditures, "Statistics Korea", Seoul:Statistics Korea, ~ (2014)