Productivity Analysis on the Service Sector in Korea: Evidence from Industry-Level and Firm-Level Data
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the most dramatic characterizations of late industrializa-tion is the speed and scope of structural transformation from manufacturing-based to service-based economy. This study aims to analyze this transformation in the Korean economy in terms of productivity performance in its service sector over the period of 1995–2013 in which the economy experienced two financial crises in the years 1997 and 2007. The major finding is that, while the growth rate of gross output in the service sector has decelerated more rapidly than in the manufacturing sector, the growth rate of total factor productivity (TFP) has improved from near 0% during 1996–2010 to 1.41% during 2011–2013. Particularly, the improvement in TFP in distribution and producer services has been impressive, which indicates that the Korean economy is transforming itself toward a service-oriented growth and that two financial crises have helped such transformation. However, the relative level of TFP in the service sector remains to be far behind than that of the US and Japan.
Abstract
One of the most dramatic characterizations of late industrializa-tion is the speed and scope of structural transformation from manufacturing-based to service-based economy. This study aims to analyze this transformation in the Korean economy in terms of productivity performance in its service sector over the period of 1995–2013 in which the economy experienced two financial crises in the years 1997 and 2007. The major finding is that, while the growth rate of gross output in the service sector has decelerated more rapidly than in the manufacturing sector, the growth rate of total factor productivity (TFP) has improved from near 0% during 1996–2010 to 1.41% during 2011–2013. Particularly, the improvement in TFP in distribution and producer services has been impressive, which indicates that the Korean economy is transforming itself toward a service-oriented growth and that two financial crises have helped such transformation. However, the relative level of TFP in the service sector remains to be far behind than that of the US and Japan.
참고문헌 (25)
- 전현배, "Multifactor Productivity in Korea and an International Comparison: Data and Productivity Estimates of the Korea Industrial Productivity Database", Seoul Journal of Economics, 21(4), pp.551~577 (2008), 경제연구소[DOI]
- "US Productivity after the Dot Com Bust" (2005)[URL]
- Plant Turnover and TFP Dynamics in Japanese Manufacturing, CEI Working Paper Series, "Fukao, K.", Hitotsubashi University, ~, pp.No. 2006-17 (2006)
- Fukao, K., "Industrial Productivity in Europe: Growth and Crisis. Chapter 9", pp.264~304 (2012), Edward Elgar
- Harberger, A. C., "A Vision of the Growth Process", The American Economic Review, 88(1), pp.1~32 (1998)
- 하봉찬, "The Measurement of IT Contribution by Decomposed Dynamic Input-Output Tables in Korea (1980-2002)", Seoul Journal of Economics, 17(4), pp.511~546 (2004), 경제연구소
- Hein, E., "Distribution, Aggregate Demand and Productivity Growth: Theory and Empirical Results for Six OECD Countries Based on a Post-Kaleckian Model", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), pp.727~754 (2010)
- Kaldor, N., "Strategic Factors in Economic Development" (1967), New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University
- Kaldor, N., "Inflation and Recession in the World Economy", The Economic Journal, 86(344), pp.703~714 (1976)
- Kim, H. J., "Industrial Productivity in Europe: Growth and Crisis, Chapter 9", pp.428~459 (2012), Edward Elgar
- 김현정, "서비스산업 비중증가의 원인 및 경제성장에 미치는 영향", 경제분석, 12(4), pp.35~76 (2006), 한국은행
- 이영훈, "Productivity Growth and Patterns of Efficiency Changes in Korean Economy: Stochastic Frontier Approach with Industry-Panel Data", Seoul Journal of Economics, 20(1), pp.23~58 (2007), 경제연구소[DOI]
- McCombie, J., "Productivity Growth and Economic Performance", pp.64~114 (2002), Palgrave Macmillan
- "National Accounts"[URL]
- Pyo, H. K., "Economic Growth in Korea (1911-1999): A Long-term Trend and Perspective", Seoul Journal of Economics, 14(1), pp.59~125 (2001)
- Pyo, H. K, "Productivity Dynamics in Emerging and Industrialized Countries" (2018), Taylor & Francis Group
- Pyo, H. K., "The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis. Chapter 23" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Pyo, H. K., "A Test of Separability and Random Effects in Production Function with Decomposed IT Capital", Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 48(1), pp.67~81 (2007)
- Rhee, K. H., "Financial Crisis and Relative Productivity Dynamics in Korea: Evidence From Firm-level Data (1992–2003)", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(2), pp.111~131 (2010)
- 이근희, "Aggregate Total Factor Productivity and Resource Reallocation Effect of ICT Sectors in Korea: A Comparison with the USA, Japan and EU7", The Korean Economic Review, 28(2), pp.189~219 (2012), 한국경제학회
- 이근희, "기업동학, 자원재분배 및 노동생산성 결정요인:「기업활동조사(2006-2012)」에 기초한 패널분석", 한국경제의 분석, 21(3), pp.43~114 (2015), 한국경제의 분석패널
- Storm, S., "The NAIRU Reconsidered: Why Labour Market Deregulation May Raise Unemployment", International Review of Applied Economics, 22(5), pp.527~544 (2008)
- The Bank of Korea, "Input-Output Statistics", ~ (2015)
- Van Ark, B., "International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices", pp.327~367 (1999), University of Chicago Press
- Whitefoot, Kate S., "Innovation and Manufacturing Labor: A Value-Chain Perspective" (2015), Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings