본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

진실ㆍ화해위원회 이후: 아르헨티나와 페루의 배ㆍ보상과 추모 정책

After the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC): The Policy of Reparations and Commemoration in Argentina and Peru.

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article tries to examine what followed after the official activities of the Argentine CONADEP(Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas) and the Peruvian TRC. The Argentine example along with its official report titled Nunca Más was regarded as a model case that the subsequent similar commissions would have to consult. After a long pause of forgetting and indifference, the Argentine civilian governments succeeded in resuming the processes of transitional justice, caring for the victims’ rights to truth and justice,providing them with reparations, and even putting the military perpetrators on trial. In contrast, the Peruvian case, in spite of the comprehensive recommendations of the TRC, exemplified a complex and unfavorable situation in which the longstanding tripartite strife hindered the successive governments from propelling effective policies of reparations and reconciliation. In both countries, reparations entailed acts of restoring what had been lost and giving something, whether symbolic or material, to victims equivalent to a loss to compensate harm. Neither truth nor justice, including economic reparations,was able to repair the loss of victims, but such measures provided recognition for victims and contributed to better individual and collective processes of dealing with the tragic past. The policy of reconciliation included not only reparations but also a continuing dynamic confrontation with the past, in other words, an exercise of memorialization through institutional and state-sponsored commemoration. In Argentina and Peru, these programs of reconciliation at the level of the state worked in the form of building monuments for victims and opening security archives, though it is too early to judge whether such development of levels of reconciliation could be identified as solid democratization and culture of peace and human rights.

Abstract

This article tries to examine what followed after the official activities of the Argentine CONADEP(Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas) and the Peruvian TRC. The Argentine example along with its official report titled Nunca Más was regarded as a model case that the subsequent similar commissions would have to consult. After a long pause of forgetting and indifference, the Argentine civilian governments succeeded in resuming the processes of transitional justice, caring for the victims’ rights to truth and justice,providing them with reparations, and even putting the military perpetrators on trial. In contrast, the Peruvian case, in spite of the comprehensive recommendations of the TRC, exemplified a complex and unfavorable situation in which the longstanding tripartite strife hindered the successive governments from propelling effective policies of reparations and reconciliation. In both countries, reparations entailed acts of restoring what had been lost and giving something, whether symbolic or material, to victims equivalent to a loss to compensate harm. Neither truth nor justice, including economic reparations,was able to repair the loss of victims, but such measures provided recognition for victims and contributed to better individual and collective processes of dealing with the tragic past. The policy of reconciliation included not only reparations but also a continuing dynamic confrontation with the past, in other words, an exercise of memorialization through institutional and state-sponsored commemoration. In Argentina and Peru, these programs of reconciliation at the level of the state worked in the form of building monuments for victims and opening security archives, though it is too early to judge whether such development of levels of reconciliation could be identified as solid democratization and culture of peace and human rights.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 박구병, "추악한 전쟁'의 상흔: 실종자 문제와 아르헨티나 <오월광장 어머니회>의 투쟁", 라틴아메리카연구, 19(2), pp.69~96 (2006), 한국라틴아메리카학회
  2. 해외 진실화해위원회 보고서 자료집 II, "진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회", 진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회, ~ (2008)
  3. 진실화해위원회 자료집 III: 화해·위령·재단 관련 번역 자료집(남미·남아공), "진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회", 진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회, ~ (2010)
  4. 캐서린 하이트, "기억의 정치, 인권의 언어. in: 신자유주의 이후의 라틴아메리카: 21세기에 대세를 전환하다", pp.266~292 (2008), 모티브북
  5. 프리실라 B. 헤이너, "국가폭력과 세계의 진실위원회" (2008), 역사비평사
  6. Agüero, Felipe, "Dictatorship and Human Rights: The Politics of Memory", Radical History Review, 97, pp.123~133 (2007)
  7. Alberti, Gloria, "Los Archivos del Dolor en América Latina. International Council on Archives", Comma, (2), pp.99~107 (2004)
  8. Barahona de Brito, Alexandra, "Truth, Justice, Memory, and Democratization in the Southern Cone. in: The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies", pp.119~160 (2001), Oxford University Press
  9. Burt, Jo-Marie, "Political Violence and the Authoritarian State in Peru: Silencing Civil Society" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  10. Carrillo, Arturo J., "Justice in Context: The Relevance of Inter-American Human Rights Law and Practice to Repairing the Past. in: The Handbook of Reparations", pp.504~538 (2006), Oxford University Press
  11. Cole, Elizabeth A., "Teaching the Violent Past: History Education and Reconciliation" (2007), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  12. "Informe Final"[URL]
  13. Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación, "Un pasado de violencia, un futuro de Paz: 20 años de violencia 1980-2000" (2003), Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación, Defensoria del Pueblo
  14. Cueva, Eduardo González, "The Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Challenge of Impunity. in: Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice", pp.70~93 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  15. Defensoría del Pueblo, "El Estado frente a las víctimas de la violencia. ¿Hacia dónde vamos en políticas de reparación y justicia?", Serie Informes Defensoriales-Informe, (128) (2008), Defensoría del Pueblo
  16. Grandin, Greg, "The Instruction of Great Catastrophe: Truth Commissions, National History, and State Formation in Argentina, Chile, and Guatemala", American Historical Review, 110(1), pp.46~67 (2005)
  17. Guembe, María José, "The Handbook of Reparations", pp.21~54 (2006), Oxford University Press
  18. Guillerot, Julie, "Reparaciones en la transición peruana: Memorias de un proceso inacabado", pp.2006, APRODEH
  19. Haworth, Nigel, "Radicalization and the Left in Peru, 1976-1991. in: The Latin American Left: From the Fall of Allende to Perestroika", pp.41~59 (1993), Westview Press
  20. Instituto Espacio para la Memoria, "Leyes principales instrumentos legales sobre derechos humanos y memoria" (2007), Instituto Espacio para la Memoria
  21. Jelin, Elizabeth, "State Repression and the Labors of Memory, translated by Judy Rein and Marcial Godoy-Anativia" (2003), University of Minnesota Press
  22. Kaiser, Susana, "Postmemories of Terror: A New Generation Copes with the Legacy of the ‘Dirty War’" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
  23. Laplante, Lisa J., "Truth with Consequences: Justice and Reparations in Post-Truth Commission Peru", Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), pp.228~250 (2007)
  24. Lerner Febres, Salomón, "Achievements and Tasks in Confronting the Past in Peru and Latin America. in: 세계과거사청산의흐름과한국의과거사정리 후속조치 방안 모색", 진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회 국제 심포지엄 자료집, pp.248~267 (2009)
  25. Maymí-Sugrañes, "Latin American Archival Theory and Practice during the 1970s and 1980s", Libraries & Culture, 34(3), pp.222~240 (1999)
  26. Méndez, Juan E., "Unspeakable Truths", Human Rights Quarterly, 25(1), pp.237~256 (2003)
  27. Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, "Conclusion: Combating Impunity. in: Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice", pp.281~304 (1995), Oxford University Press
  28. Segovia, Alexander, "Financing Reparations Programs: Reflections from International Experience. in: The Handbook of Reparations", pp.650~675 (2006), Oxford University Press
  29. Sikkink, Kathryn, "Argentina’s Contribution to Global Trends in Transitional Justice. in: Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice", pp.301~324 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  30. Stern, Steve J., "Conclusion. Shining and Other Paths: The Origins, Dynamics, and Legacies of War, 1980-1995. in: Shining and Other Paths: War and Society in Peru, 1980-1995", pp.470~476 (1998), Duke University Press
  31. Tandeciarz, Silvia R., "Citizens of Memory: Refiguring the Past in Postdictatorship Argentina", Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 122(1), pp.151~169 (2007)
  32. Tappatá de Valdez, Patricia, "El Parque de la Memoria en Buenos Aires. in: Monumentos, memoriales y marcas territoriales", pp.97~111 (2003), Siglo veintiuno de Argentina Editores
  33. Tappatá de Valdez, Patricia, "Archivos y Organizaciones de Defensa de los Derechos Humanos en Argentina", Comma, (2), pp.109~114 (2004)
  34. Theidon, Kimberly, "Entre prójimos: El conflicto armado interno y la política de la reconciliación en el Perú" (2004), IEP
  35. Theidon, Kimberly, "Justice in Transition: The Micropolitics of Reconciliation in Postwar Peru", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(3), pp.433~457 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)