COVID-19 팬데믹이 BTC 변동성과 거래량의 관계구조에 미친 영향 분석: CRQ 접근법
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Relationship Structure between Volatility and Trading Volume in the BTC Market: A CRQ approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 투자자의 거래행태를 민감하게 반영하는 비트코인(BTC) 시장 자료를 이용한 실증분석을 통해 COVID-19 팬데믹이 발생하기 전과 후에 변동성과 거래량의 비선형 관계가 바뀌었다는 흥미로운 사실을 발견하였다. 즉, COVID-19 팬데믹 이전의 안정적 시장 상태에서는 정보 유입 패러다임에 근거한 이론처럼 두 변수의 관계가 양(+)으로 나타났지만 COVID-19 팬데믹 기간에 발생한 극단적 시장 스트레스 상태에서는 두 변수의 의존관계 구조가 달라지고 심지어 음(-)의 관계가 나타났다. 이는 행태경제학적 관점에서 COVID-19 팬데믹 기간의 시장 스트레스 증가가 투자자의 거래 행태(behavior)를 변화시켜 자산시장에 구조변화를 일으켰으며, 변동성과 거래량의 비선형 의존관계(특히, 극단적 분위수(quantiles)의 의존성)에 중대한 영향을 미친 결과라고 추론해 볼 수 있다. 따라서 정보 유입 외에 시장 스트레스로 인한 행태적 편의나 군집행동(herding)과 같은 심리현상이 두 변수의 의존관계 구조를 변화시키는 주요인이 될 수 있다는 전제하에 이를 검정해보았다. 본 연구는 실증분석을 위해 Ross (2015)의 구조변화 탐지 검정을 수행하였으며, 독립적이고 동일하게 분포하는(i.i.d.) 임의변수 가정 없이 비선형 관계구조와 분포 꼬리 부분의 비대칭적 의존관계를 면밀히 파악할 수 있는 Copula 회귀분위수(CRQ) 접근법을 제안하였다.
Abstract
This study found an interesting fact that the nonlinear relationship structure between volatility and trading volume changed before and after the COVID-19 pandemic according to empirical analysis using Bitcoin (BTC) market data that sensitively reflects investors’ trading behavior. That is, their relationship appeared positive (+) in a stable market state before COVID-19 pandemic, as in theory based on the information flow paradigm. In a state under severe market stress due to COVID-19 pandemic, however, their dependence structure changed and even negative (-). This can be seen as a consequence of increased market stress caused by COVID-19 pandemics from a behavioral economics perspective, resulting in structural changes in the asset market and a significant impact on the nonlinear dependence of volatility and trading volume (in particular, their dependence at extreme quantiles). Hence, it should be recognized that in addition to information flows, psychological phenomena such as behavioral biases or herd behavior, which are closely related to market stress, can be a key in changing their dependence structure. For empirical analysis, this study performs a test of Ross (2015) for detecting a structural change, and proposes a Copula Regression Quantiles (CRQ) approach that can identify their nonlinear relationship structure and the asymmetric dependence in their distribution tails without the assumption of i.i.d. random variable. In addition, it was confirmed that when the relationship between their extreme values was analyzed by linear models, incorrect results could be derived due to model specification errors.
참고문헌 (27)
- Basset, G., "An Empirical Quantile Function for Linear Models with iid Errors", Journal of American Statistical Association, 77, pp.407~415 (1982)
- Bekaert, G., "The Time Variation of Risk and Return in Foreign Exchange Markets : a General Equilibrium Perspective", Review of Financial Studies, 9, pp.427~470 (1996)
- Bessembinder, H., "An Empirical Examination of Information, Differences of Opinion, and Trading Activity", Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), pp.105~134 (1996)
- Bessembinder, H, "Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth : Evidence from Futures Markets", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(1), pp.21~39 (1993)
- Bouyé, E., "Dynamic Copula Quantile Regressions and Tail Area Dynamic Dependence in Forex Markets", The European Journal of Finance, 15, pp.721~750 (2009)
- Cao, C., "Nonlinear dynamics, chaos and econometrics", pp.157~177 (1993), John Wiley & Sons
- Chen, X., "Copula-based Nonlinear Quantile Autoregression", Econometrics Journal, 12, pp.S50~S67 (2009)
- Clark, P. K., "A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Process", Econometrica, 41, pp.135~155 (1973)
- Copeland, T. E., "A Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival", Journal of Finance, 31, pp.1149~1168 (1976)
- Diether, K., "Differences of Opinion and the Cross Section of Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, 57, pp.2113~2141 (2002)
- Embrechts, P., "Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond", pp.176~223 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Trading Volumes, Volatility and Spreads in Foreign Exchange Markets: Evidence from Emerging Market Countries, "Galati, G.", BIS, ~, pp.BIS Working Papers, No. 93 (2000)
- Hellwig, M. F., "On the Aggregation of Information in Competitive Markets", Journal of Economic Theory, 22, pp.477~498 (1980)
- Jena, S., "Index Futures Volatility and Trading Activity : Measuring Causality at a Multiple Horizon", Finance Research Letters, 24, pp.247~255 (2018)
- Jennings, R., "An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival", Journal of Finance, 36, pp.143~161 (1981)
- Jorion, P., "The Microstructure of Foreign Exchange Markets", pp.19~36 (1996), University of Chicago Press
- Koenker, R., "Regression Quantiles", Econometrica, 46, pp.33~50 (1978)
- Koenker, R., "An Interior Point Algorithm for Nonlinear Quantile Regression", Journal of Econometrics, 71, pp.265~283 (1996)
- Park, B. J., "Surprising Information, the MDH, and the Relationship between Volatility and Trading Volume", Journal of Financial Markets, 13, pp.344~366 (2010)
- Park, B. J., "Asymmetric Herding as a Source of Asymmetric Return Volatility", Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, pp.2657~2665 (2011)
- Noh, H., "Semiparametric conditional Quantile Estimation through Copula-based Multivariate Models", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 33(2), pp.167~178 (2015)
- Ross, G., "Parametric and Nonparametric Sequential Change Detection in R : The cpm Package", Journal of Statistical Software, 66(3), pp.1~20 (2015)
- Schwert, G., "Stock Volatility and the Crash of ‘87’", Review of Financial Studies, 3, pp.77~102 (1990)
- Sklar, A., "Fonctions de Répartition à n Dimensions et Leurs Marges", Publications de l’Institut Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 8, pp.229~231 (1959)
- Tauchen, G., "The Price Variability-volume Relationship on Speculative Markets", Econometrica, 5, pp.485~550 (1983)
- Wang, T., "The Relationship between Volatility and Trading Volume in the Chinese Stock Market : A volatility Decomposition Perspective", Annals of Economics and Finance, 13, pp.211~236 (2012)
- Zheng Z., "Realized Volatility and Absolute Return Volatility: A Comparison Indicating Market Risk", PLoS ONE, 9(7), pp.e102940~ (2014)