EU委員會의 調査權限과 當事者의 防禦權 -競爭法 違反行爲를 中心으로-
The powers of investigation of the EU-Commission and the rights of defence of the parties -in relation to the competition law enforcement-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The powers of investigation of the EU-Commission after the Reg. 1/2003 have been more strengthened through the codification of the judgments of the European Courts and of the decisions of the Commission. When some procedural rules after the Regulation would be violated, fines could be also imposed in order to improve effectiveness and ability of the enforcement to the decisions of the Commission. In the procedure of the investigation should the procedural rights of defense of the parties and the due process of law, for example, rights of hearing, access to the Commission’s file, professional secrecy and legal privilege between the lawyer and the client, be fully guaranteed as important human rights of the legal order of the European Community. Korean Fair Trade Commission has strong rights of investigations. The rights of parties should be better ensured, for example, by means of the amendment of the law.
Abstract
The powers of investigation of the EU-Commission after the Reg. 1/2003 have been more strengthened through the codification of the judgments of the European Courts and of the decisions of the Commission. When some procedural rules after the Regulation would be violated, fines could be also imposed in order to improve effectiveness and ability of the enforcement to the decisions of the Commission. In the procedure of the investigation should the procedural rights of defense of the parties and the due process of law, for example, rights of hearing, access to the Commission’s file, professional secrecy and legal privilege between the lawyer and the client, be fully guaranteed as important human rights of the legal order of the European Community. Korean Fair Trade Commission has strong rights of investigations. The rights of parties should be better ensured, for example, by means of the amendment of the law.
참고문헌 (22)
- 이순미, "공정거래위원회의 카르텔 執行 현황 및 전망", (2007-04) (2007)
- Andreangeli, "The Protection of Legal Professional Privilege in EU Law and the Impact of the Rules on the Exchange of Information within the European Competition Network on the Secrecy of Communications between Lawyer and Client: one step forward, two steps back?" (2005)
- Bechtold, "EG-Kartellrecht" (2005)
- Burnside, "AM&S, Akzo and beyond: legal professional privilege in the wake of modernisation", pp.9~11 (2005)
- Dalheimer, "EU-Kartellverfahrensverordnung" (2005)
- De Bronett, "Kommentar zum europ?ischen Kartellverfahrensrecht" (2005)
- Dieckmann, "Handbuch des Kartellrechts" (1999), C.H.Beck
- Garzanti, "Dawn of a new era? Powers of investigation and enforcement under Reg.1", 2003, 2004, ~
- Hwang, T, "Das Sanktionensystem des europaeischen Kartellrechts nach der VO 1", 2003, 2007, ~
- Jones, "EC Competition law" (2005), Oxford
- Kerse, "Antitrust procedure" (2005), Oxford
- Klees, "Europ?isches Kartellverfahrensrecht" (2005)
- Kleine-Cosack, "Syndikusanw?lte zwischen Tabuisierung und Legitimierung" (2005)
- Kling, "Kartellrecht" (2007)
- Lampert, "Recht und Wirtschaft" (2004)
- Mestm?cker, "Europ?isches Wettbewerbsrecht" (2004)
- Meyer, "Befugnisse und Grenzen kartellrechtlicher Durchsetzung nach VO 1", 2003 und nationalem Rech, 2004, ~
- Redeker, "Der Syndikusanwalt als Rechtsanwalt" (2004)
- Riley, "EC Antitrust modernisation: the commission does very nicely-thank you, part 1. Reg 1. and the notification burden" (2003)
- Schwarze, "Grundz?ge des europ?ischen Kartellverfahrensrecht" (2004)
- Sch?tz, "GWB und Europ?isches Kartellrecht -Gemeinschaftskommentar" (2004)
- Whish, "Competition law" (2005), Oxford