부가중합형 실리콘 교합인기재의 탄성 특성
Elastic properties of addition silicone interocclusal recording materials
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : In this study, contact angle and shore D hardness were measured, and a shark fin test was conducted after selecting five addition silicon(Blu-Mousse, BM; EXABITEⅡ, EX; PERFECT, PF; RegisilⓇRigid, RE; SilagumⓇ, SI) in order to figure out the properties of elastomeric interocclusal recording materials and reduce errors at interocclusal recording. 8)Methods : A contact angle was measured using a contact angle analyzer. After placing a drop of liquid on the surface of the specimens of interocclusal recording materials, a contact angle was photographed with a CCD camera on the equipment. In terms of a shark fin test, interocclusal recording materials were mixed for the time proposed by the manufacturer and inserted into the split ring of the Shark fin device. Twenty (20) seconds exactly, a metal rod was removed to make the materials slowly absorbed. Once they hardened,fin height was measured with a caliper after separating molds and trimming the specimens. The shore D hardness was measured with a shore D hardness tester(Model HPDSD, Hans Schmidt & Co. Gmbh, Germany)in sixty (60) minutes after fabricating specimens. In each experiment, five specimens, mean and standard deviation were calculated. A one-way ANOVA test was performed at the p＞0.05 level of significance. In terms of correlation among the tests, Pearson correlation coefficient was estimated. For multiple comparison, Scheffe’s test was carried out. Results : A contact angle was the highest in EX with 99.23° (p＜0.05) while the result of the shark fin test was the longest in RE with 5.45mm. SI was the lowest (0.27mm) with statistical significance. Among the interocclusal recording materials, significant difference was observed in terms of means (p＜0.05). The shore D hardness was the highest in SI with 31.0 while RE was significantly low with 16.4 (p＜0.05). Among the materials, statistically significant difference was observed in terms of means when compared to the rest materials (RE), BM, RE and SI (PF and EX) and the remaining materials (BM and SI) (p＜0.05). In terms of correlations among the tests, a negative correlation occurred between shore D hardness and shark fin test(r=-0.823, p=0.000). Conclusions : According to the study above, it is necessary to understand the properties of interocclusal recording materials and consider contact angle, shark fin test and properties of shore D hardness to select appropriate materials.
Abstract
Objectives : In this study, contact angle and shore D hardness were measured, and a shark fin test was conducted after selecting five addition silicon(Blu-Mousse, BM; EXABITEⅡ, EX; PERFECT, PF; RegisilⓇRigid, RE; SilagumⓇ, SI) in order to figure out the properties of elastomeric interocclusal recording materials and reduce errors at interocclusal recording. 8)Methods : A contact angle was measured using a contact angle analyzer. After placing a drop of liquid on the surface of the specimens of interocclusal recording materials, a contact angle was photographed with a CCD camera on the equipment. In terms of a shark fin test, interocclusal recording materials were mixed for the time proposed by the manufacturer and inserted into the split ring of the Shark fin device. Twenty (20) seconds exactly, a metal rod was removed to make the materials slowly absorbed. Once they hardened,fin height was measured with a caliper after separating molds and trimming the specimens. The shore D hardness was measured with a shore D hardness tester(Model HPDSD, Hans Schmidt & Co. Gmbh, Germany)in sixty (60) minutes after fabricating specimens. In each experiment, five specimens, mean and standard deviation were calculated. A one-way ANOVA test was performed at the p＞0.05 level of significance. In terms of correlation among the tests, Pearson correlation coefficient was estimated. For multiple comparison, Scheffe’s test was carried out. Results : A contact angle was the highest in EX with 99.23° (p＜0.05) while the result of the shark fin test was the longest in RE with 5.45mm. SI was the lowest (0.27mm) with statistical significance. Among the interocclusal recording materials, significant difference was observed in terms of means (p＜0.05). The shore D hardness was the highest in SI with 31.0 while RE was significantly low with 16.4 (p＜0.05). Among the materials, statistically significant difference was observed in terms of means when compared to the rest materials (RE), BM, RE and SI (PF and EX) and the remaining materials (BM and SI) (p＜0.05). In terms of correlations among the tests, a negative correlation occurred between shore D hardness and shark fin test(r=-0.823, p=0.000). Conclusions : According to the study above, it is necessary to understand the properties of interocclusal recording materials and consider contact angle, shark fin test and properties of shore D hardness to select appropriate materials.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이영옥, "탄성 교합인기재의 물성비교", 대한치과기재학회지, 37(1), pp.75~88 (2010), 대한치과기재학회
- Ghazal M, "The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension", J Oral Rehabil, 35(11), pp.816~820 (2008)
- Dental Materials Research Society of Dental Hygienics, "Advanced Dental Materials", pp.116~118 (2009), Komoonsa
- Ji-Myung Bae, "Comparison of different interocclusal recording materials", J Kor Res Soc Dent Mat, 22(2), pp.187~195 (1995)
- Fattore L, "Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials", J Prosthet Dent, 51(2), pp.152~157 (1984)
- Lassila V, "Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials", J Prosthet Dent, 55(2), pp.215~218 (1986)
- Millstein PL, "Accuracy of laminated wax interocclusal wafers", J Prosthet Dent, 54(4), pp.574~577 (1985)
- Vergos VK, "Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records", Int J Prosthodont, 16(4), pp.365~368 (2003)
- Chai J, "An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials", J Prosthodont, 3(3), pp.134~137 (1994)
- Michalakis KX, "An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting", J Prosthodont, 13(1), pp.42~46 (2004)
- Chai J, "A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials", Int J Prosthodont, 7(6), pp.538~542 (1994)
- Siddiqui A, "An experimental and theoretical study of the effect of sample thickness on the Shore hardness of elastomers", Dent Mater, 26(6), pp.560~564 (2010)
- Guiotti AM, "Evaluation of the Shore A hardness of silicone for facial prosthesis as to the effect of storage period and chemical disinfection", J Craniofac Surg, 21(2), pp.323~327 (2010)
- Meththananda IM, "The relationship between Shore hardness of elastomeric dental materials and Young’s modulus", Dent Mater, 25(8), pp.956~959 (2009)
- Balkenhol M, "Shark fin test and impression quality: a correlation analysis", J Dent, 35(5), pp.409~415 (2007)
- German MJ, "Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties", Dent Mater, 24(7), pp.951~956 (2008)
- Balkenhol M, "Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials", Int J Prosthodont, 22(4), pp.396~398 (2009)
- Lorren RA, "The contact angles of die stone on impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 36(2), pp.176~180 (1976)
- Panichuttra R, "Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness", Int J Prosthodont, 4(3), pp.240~248 (1991)
- Chong YH, "Relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts", Dent Mater, 6(3), pp.162~166 (1990)
- Walker MP, "Vertical dimensional stability and rigidity of occlusal registration materials", Gen Dent, 57(5), pp.514~518 (2009)
- 이영옥, "탄성 고무 교합인기재의 물리적·기계적 특성", 대한치과기재학회지, 37(4), pp.333~340 (2010), 대한치과기재학회
- Vergos VK, "Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records", Int J Prosthodont, 16(4), pp.365~368 (2003)
- Yong-Jun Park, "Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11 ed.", pp.38~ (2006), Charmyun Publishing
- Extrand CW, "Contact angles of liquid drops on super hydrophobic surfaces: understanding the role of flattening of drops by gravity", Langmuir, 26(22), pp.17090~17099 (2010)