본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인상채득 후 경화방법에 따른 주모형의 변화

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

There was to purpose of this study improves analyzing cause that prosthesis brings bite engaging that is inaccurate in patient's mouth, when supposed that all conducts that do in operatory and dental laboratory are perfect. Impression did check bite by alginate impression material and polymerization style silicon impression material that use usually in presence at a sickbed Irreversibility, hydrocolloid, alginate impression material washed in flowing water and poured anhydrite after wait about 8 minutes so that region that charge interest after impression check bite may become undoing. And hydrophile property addition polymerization style impression material poured anhydrite after blow 30 considering impression material dwell time and H2 gas occurrence time (5~15 minute) after have washed in flowing water. I got each 7 models, result that manufactures total 28 and measures by third dimension measuring instrument (Meteo, Korea) following sequence curing in tray holder and floor 1. By Alginate impression when is hardened in tray holder and when is hardened in the floor after do check bite, SPH 4, SPH5 all as there is synonymy appeared(P< 0.05). By in case do not use average 0.1741 in case use tray holder in 0.0447 SPH5s in case do not use average 0.2838 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 0.0309. When did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, when used tray holder, I appeared more greatly. 2. By amity sex addition polymerization style silicon impression when is hardened in tray holder after do check bite and when is hardened in the floor SPH 4, all of the SPH5s very big synonymy be(P> 0.05) . And in case use tray holder in 0.000657 pasta SPH5s in case do not use average 0.000129 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 average 0.000114 pastas, by in case do not use 0.000757, I appeared more greatly when used tray when did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, but I appeared is not level to keep in mind(Table 8~9). 3. SPH4 was looked very big mindfulness in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon without using tray holder(P< 0.001) . I use tray holder and SPH4 did not appear synonymy in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon(P> 0.05) . Study finding of above when see synthesis Alginate certainly tray holder use must and I could know that hardening method does not exert big influence on volume stability if remove impression sieve of excess because amity sex accessory penalty silicon passes over tray. Also, Alginate impression material previewed can get heading a conspiracy style that volume stability of accessory penalty silicon impression material degree is if use tray holder.

Abstract

There was to purpose of this study improves analyzing cause that prosthesis brings bite engaging that is inaccurate in patient's mouth, when supposed that all conducts that do in operatory and dental laboratory are perfect. Impression did check bite by alginate impression material and polymerization style silicon impression material that use usually in presence at a sickbed Irreversibility, hydrocolloid, alginate impression material washed in flowing water and poured anhydrite after wait about 8 minutes so that region that charge interest after impression check bite may become undoing. And hydrophile property addition polymerization style impression material poured anhydrite after blow 30 considering impression material dwell time and H2 gas occurrence time (5~15 minute) after have washed in flowing water. I got each 7 models, result that manufactures total 28 and measures by third dimension measuring instrument (Meteo, Korea) following sequence curing in tray holder and floor 1. By Alginate impression when is hardened in tray holder and when is hardened in the floor after do check bite, SPH 4, SPH5 all as there is synonymy appeared(P< 0.05). By in case do not use average 0.1741 in case use tray holder in 0.0447 SPH5s in case do not use average 0.2838 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 0.0309. When did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, when used tray holder, I appeared more greatly. 2. By amity sex addition polymerization style silicon impression when is hardened in tray holder after do check bite and when is hardened in the floor SPH 4, all of the SPH5s very big synonymy be(P> 0.05) . And in case use tray holder in 0.000657 pasta SPH5s in case do not use average 0.000129 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 average 0.000114 pastas, by in case do not use 0.000757, I appeared more greatly when used tray when did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, but I appeared is not level to keep in mind(Table 8~9). 3. SPH4 was looked very big mindfulness in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon without using tray holder(P< 0.001) . I use tray holder and SPH4 did not appear synonymy in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon(P> 0.05) . Study finding of above when see synthesis Alginate certainly tray holder use must and I could know that hardening method does not exert big influence on volume stability if remove impression sieve of excess because amity sex accessory penalty silicon passes over tray. Also, Alginate impression material previewed can get heading a conspiracy style that volume stability of accessory penalty silicon impression material degree is if use tray holder.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 이성복, "완벽을 추구하는 인상채득", pp.2~9 (2007), 대한나래
  2. Chee WW, "Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.728~732 (1992)
  3. Blatz MB, "Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression materials - A randomized clinical trial", Quintessence Int, 36, pp.97~104 (2005)
  4. Berg JC, "Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.150~161 (2003)
  5. Braden M., "A polyether impression rubber", J Dent Res, 51, pp.889~896 (1972)
  6. Wadhwani CPK, "Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.530~539 (2005)
  7. Marcinak CF, "Linear dimensional changes in elastic impression materials", J Dent Res, 59, pp.1152~1155 (1980)
  8. Bailey JH, "The dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone, silberplated, and epoxy resin die materials", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.307~310 (1988)
  9. Lacy AM, "Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials PartⅠ, Condensation silicones", J Prosthet Dent, 45, pp.209~215 (1981)
  10. Lacy AM, "Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials PartⅡ, Poltether, polysulfides and Polyvinyl siloxane", J Prosthet Dent, 45, pp.329~333 (1981)
  11. Jonhson GH, "Accuracy of four type of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.484~490 (1985)
  12. Stackhouse JA, "A comparison of elastic impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 34, pp.305~313 (1975)
  13. Mendez AJ, "The influence of impression tray on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 54, pp.383~388 (1985)
  14. Moyers RE, "Handbook of Orthodontics" (1988), Year book medical publishers
  15. Tjan AHL, "Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.19~28 (1992)
  16. Cho GC, "Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.354~358 (2004)
  17. Ryu SI, "The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of the stone casts poured from complete arch impressions", J Korea Acad Prosthet Dent, 30, pp.1~13 (1992)
  18. Wilson HJ, "The bonding of alginate impression materials to impression trays", Brit Dent, 115, pp.291~294 (1963)
  19. 고무영, "치과재료학", pp.120~127 (2004), 군자출판사
  20. Shillingburg, H.T., "Fundamentals of fixed prosthdontics" (1976), Quintessence Publishing Co
  21. 김주태, "치과재료학", pp.80~82 (1994), 정필사
  22. Piwowarczyk A., "In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.168~174 (2002)
  23. Eames WB, "Accuracy and dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 42, pp.159~162 (1979)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)