라텍스 글러브가 시판되는 3종류 부가중합형 실리콘 인상재의 중합에 미치는 영향
Effect of latex gloves on polymerization inhibition of addition silicone impression materials
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the polymerization inhibition effect of latex gloves on addition silicone impression material. Three different kinds of addition silicone impression materials and a natural latex gloves were used in this study. The results were as follows. 1. Compared to the control group, all of those three kinds of impression materials took longer curing time in order of unwashed, alcohol and washed group, on the other hand, degloving group had shorter curing time than control group(p<0.05). 2. By the type of impression materials, there was no significant difference observed between Exafine and Twinz in ungloved group, Exafine and ImprintⅡ in unwashed group, and Exafine and Twinz in degloving group(p>0.05). 3. The degree of polymerization at 6 minutes after mixing impression materials was evaluated by dividing its range into score 1 to 5. All of the impression materials got score 5 in control group and degloving group, which implies perfect polymerization. In unwashed group, most of them appeared to be score 2 while score 3 were most frequently observed in alcohol group and score 4 in washed group. Thus each group showed differences in the degree of polymerization(p<0.05).
Abstract
This study investigated the polymerization inhibition effect of latex gloves on addition silicone impression material. Three different kinds of addition silicone impression materials and a natural latex gloves were used in this study. The results were as follows. 1. Compared to the control group, all of those three kinds of impression materials took longer curing time in order of unwashed, alcohol and washed group, on the other hand, degloving group had shorter curing time than control group(p<0.05). 2. By the type of impression materials, there was no significant difference observed between Exafine and Twinz in ungloved group, Exafine and ImprintⅡ in unwashed group, and Exafine and Twinz in degloving group(p>0.05). 3. The degree of polymerization at 6 minutes after mixing impression materials was evaluated by dividing its range into score 1 to 5. All of the impression materials got score 5 in control group and degloving group, which implies perfect polymerization. In unwashed group, most of them appeared to be score 2 while score 3 were most frequently observed in alcohol group and score 4 in washed group. Thus each group showed differences in the degree of polymerization(p<0.05).
참고문헌 (24)
- Craig RG, "Comparison of commercial elastomeric impression materials", Oper Dent, 15(3), pp.94~104 (1990)
- Chee WW, "Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 68(5), pp.728~732 (1992)
- Anusavice KJ, "Phillips’science of dental materials. 11th ed", pp.205~230 (2003), Saunders
- Kahn RL, "Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test", Int J Prosthodont, 2(4), pp.342~346 (1989)
- Chee WW, "Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report", Quintessence Int, 22(2), pp.133~135 (1991)
- Kahn RL, "A pilot study of polymerization inhibition of poly(vinyl siloxane) materials by latex gloves", Int J Prosthodont, 2(2), pp.128~130 (1989)
- American Dental Association, "Infection control recommendation for the dental office and the dental laboratory", J Am Dent Assoc, 127(5), pp.672~680 (1996)
- Takla CS, "The effectiveness of an elastomeric module dispenser in cross-infection control", J Clin Orthod, 32(12), pp.721~726 (1998)
- Reitz CD, "The setting of vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone putties when mixed with gloved hands", J Am Dent Assoc, 116(3), pp.371~375 (1988)
- Rosen M, "The effect of latex gloves on setting time of vinyl polysiloxane putty impression material", Br Dent J, 166(10), pp.374~375 (1989)
- Baumann MA, "The influence of dental gloves on the setting of impression materials", Br Dent J, 179(4), pp.130~135 (1995)
- Matis BA, "The effect of the use of dental gloves on mixing vinyl polysiloxane putties", J Prosthod, 6(3), pp.189~192 (1997)
- Causton BE, "Implications of the presence of dithiocarbamate in latex gloves", Dent Mater, 9(3), pp.209~213 (1993)
- Cook WD, "Rubber gloves and addition silicone materials", Aust Dent J, 31(2), pp.140~ (1986)
- Peregrina A, "Effect of two types of latex gloves and surfactants on polymerization inhibition of three polyvinylsiloxane impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 90(3), pp.289~292 (2003)
- Korniewicz DM, "Failure rates in nonlatex surgical gloves", Am J Infect Control, 32(5), pp.268~273 (2004)
- Murray CA, "An assessment of the incidence of punctures in latex and non-lax dental examination gloves in routine clinical practice", Br Dent J, 190(7), pp.377~380 (2001)
- Hollaus PH, "Glove perforation rate in open lung surgery", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 15(4), pp.461~464 (1999)
- Wong PS, "Perforation of gloves", BMJ, 304(6837), pp.1311~ (1992)
- Occupational safety and health administration, "29 CFR part 1910. 1030. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens: Final rule", Fed Regist, 56(235), pp.64004~64182 (1991)
- Kimoto K, "Indirect latex glove contamination and its inhibitory effect on vinyl polysiloxane polymerization", J Prosthet Dent, 93(5), pp.433~438 (2005)
- Reitz CD, "The setting of vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone putties when mixed with gloved hands", J Am Dent Assoc, 116(3), pp.371~375 (1988)
- Brwoning GC, "Removal of latex glove contaminants prior to taking poly (vinylsiloxane) impressions", Quintessence Int, 25(11), pp.787~790 (1994)
- Touyz LZ, "The effect of maize starch on setting time of vinyl polysiloxane putty impression materials", J Dent Assoc S Afr, 44(9), pp.377~379 (1989)