치위생교육인증평가를 위한 평가인증 우선순위 결정
Determining Priorities for Evaluation Accreditation to Assess Dental Hygiene Education Programs
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review the systems used to evaluate dental hygiene education and to establish priorities for the evaluation index for accreditation to enhance competitiveness and facilitate quality control of dental hygiene education. Methods: A survey of priorities for accreditation evaluation was developed based on input from professors at 43 universities. Data were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process method with Expert Choice 2000 software. Results: The relative importance of each evaluation area, ranked in descending order, was as follows: vision and operating system; administration and finances; facilities and equipment; educational outcomes; professors; educational process; and students. The importance of the evaluation part was highest in field training at the education process part and scholarship at the student part. The importance after applying complex weights was highest in establishing a development plan for the vision and operating system. Conclusions: Practical accreditation evaluation based on objectivity and validity is needed to control the quality of dental hygiene education. Therefore, priorities in accreditation evaluation standard must be determined to establish a basis for quality improvement in education at dental hygiene departments.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review the systems used to evaluate dental hygiene education and to establish priorities for the evaluation index for accreditation to enhance competitiveness and facilitate quality control of dental hygiene education. Methods: A survey of priorities for accreditation evaluation was developed based on input from professors at 43 universities. Data were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process method with Expert Choice 2000 software. Results: The relative importance of each evaluation area, ranked in descending order, was as follows: vision and operating system; administration and finances; facilities and equipment; educational outcomes; professors; educational process; and students. The importance of the evaluation part was highest in field training at the education process part and scholarship at the student part. The importance after applying complex weights was highest in establishing a development plan for the vision and operating system. Conclusions: Practical accreditation evaluation based on objectivity and validity is needed to control the quality of dental hygiene education. Therefore, priorities in accreditation evaluation standard must be determined to establish a basis for quality improvement in education at dental hygiene departments.
참고문헌 (21)
- 최금진, "민간평가기구에 의한 학문분야평가의 인증기준에 대한 체제론적 분석", 교육정치학연구, 19(1), pp.157~181 (2012), 한국교육정치학회
- Yang EB, "A study on the validity of accreditation standards for medical schools in Korea", Doctor, pp.2000
- Gelmon SB., "Can educational accreditation drive interdisciplinary learning in the health professions", J on Quality Improvement, 22(3), pp.213~222 (1996)
- 박남기, "학문 분야별 인증제도 도입 방향", 교육행정학연구, 21(1), pp.269~290 (2003), 한국교육행정학회
- 채성현, "치과위생사의 핵심기본치위생역량술에 대한 숙련요구도 조사", 한국치위생학회지, 16(5), pp.651~660 (2016), 한국치위생학회[DOI]
- Song GH, "Prospect of university education in Korea and nursing education accreditation certification", pp.7~14 (2013), The Korean Acad Soc Nurs Edu
- Seo DJ, "Institute of medical education and accreditation board for engineering education", Korean Medical Education Review, 2(1), pp.57~69 (2000)
- 전경자, "지역사회간호학 실습교육 개선 방안: 간호교육 인증평가 기준을 중심으로", 지역사회간호학회지, 27(2), pp.183~192 (2016), 한국지역사회간호학회[DOI]
- 김경년, "한국 치의학 교육 평가인증제도의 현황과 발전방향", 대한치과의사협회지, 53(3), pp.201~215 (2015), 대한치과의사협회[DOI]
- Ahn DS, "Improvement measures and present condition of medical education accreditation system", Research Institute for Health Care Policy Korean Medical Association, 13(2), pp.38~44 (2015)
- Lim KY, "Improvement measures of medical, education accreditation system", pp.1~166 (2011), Korean Med Assoc
- Lee YM, "Development of outcome measurement toolkits in basic medical education program evaluation and accreditation", pp.1~185 (2018), Korean Medical Associaton
- Kim MJ, "Critical review of the influence of the accreditation system on nursingeducation", Korean Soc Nurs Sci, pp.9~31 (2011)
- "Commission on Dental Associtation(CODA)"[URL]
- Implementation of assesment in a competency-based dental hygiene science education, "Bae SM", Korean Association of Dental Hygiene Professors, 1~118 (2014)
- Lee MS, "Public hearing for Korean dental hygiene education accreditation system", pp.1~65 (2014), The national assembly of The Republic of Korea
- Satty, Thomas L., "Decision marking with the analytic hierarchy process", International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp.83~98 (2008)
- Hong IS, "A study on the priority analysis of environmental assessment indicators for road route alignment", Master’s, pp.2010
- 이재일, "AHP 분석에 의한 사용후핵연료(Spent Nuclear Fuel) 관리 정책 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구", 정책분석평가학회보, 25(3), pp.133~170 (2015), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
- 김건희, "간호학과 인증평가에 따른 간호교육의 질 향상 및 질 확보 노력에 대한 교수 인식", 의학교육논단, 13(2), pp.59~68 (2011), 연세대학교 의과대학
- 하영원, "경영학 교육 인증제도와 교육학습 평가체계", Korea Business Review, 14(3), pp.251~279 (2011), 한국경영학회