본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국내 치위생학 교과목 운영실태 및 미국 치위생학교육 인정평가 기준과의 비교연구

The implement status of dental hygiene curriculum in Korea and the comparison with the US ADA standard

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study is to provide the improvement basis for Dental Hygiene education program by analyzing the current implement status of Dental Hygiene curriculum in Korea and comparing the status with the US ADA standard. The researcher analyzed the Dental Hygiene syllabus limiting “Dental prophxis”, “Comprehensive dental hygiene”subjects only from 31 universities which offer 3 years program. The main interest was to figure the implementing status of the curriculum and to compare the actual teaching content with the CODA 2-17 standard. The results show that there are a number of problems in implementing the Dental Hygiene courses among different universities. First, there is a significant inconsistence among schools in terms of course title, total credit, hours, the ratio for theory and practice, etc. In addition, there is a big gap between the actual content of Dental Hygiene courses and the essential/required content of CODA 2-17 standard. For instance, most of the Dental Hygiene programs in Korea cover the overall assessment stage content and some of implementation stage content. However, very few programs deal with the planning and evaluation stage content. To improve these problematic circumstance a number of suggestions were made. Developing the standardized curriculum for the Dental Hygiene program might be one of the major solutions. Next, the regular accreditation and/or assessment system for the Dental Hygiene program should be developed. This research can provide the basis for the need to assess and improve the Dental Hygiene curriculum.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide the improvement basis for Dental Hygiene education program by analyzing the current implement status of Dental Hygiene curriculum in Korea and comparing the status with the US ADA standard. The researcher analyzed the Dental Hygiene syllabus limiting “Dental prophxis”, “Comprehensive dental hygiene”subjects only from 31 universities which offer 3 years program. The main interest was to figure the implementing status of the curriculum and to compare the actual teaching content with the CODA 2-17 standard. The results show that there are a number of problems in implementing the Dental Hygiene courses among different universities. First, there is a significant inconsistence among schools in terms of course title, total credit, hours, the ratio for theory and practice, etc. In addition, there is a big gap between the actual content of Dental Hygiene courses and the essential/required content of CODA 2-17 standard. For instance, most of the Dental Hygiene programs in Korea cover the overall assessment stage content and some of implementation stage content. However, very few programs deal with the planning and evaluation stage content. To improve these problematic circumstance a number of suggestions were made. Developing the standardized curriculum for the Dental Hygiene program might be one of the major solutions. Next, the regular accreditation and/or assessment system for the Dental Hygiene program should be developed. This research can provide the basis for the need to assess and improve the Dental Hygiene curriculum.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 박보영, "임상역량 강화를 위한 평가양식의 개발", 한국치의학교육학회지, 1(1), pp.26~39 (2008)
  2. ADEA(American Dental Education Association), "Competencies for Entry into the Profession of Dental Hygiene", J Dent Educ, 68(7), pp.745~749 (2004)
  3. "Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA)"[URL]
  4. Daniel & Harfst, "Dental Hygiene. 2nd ed", pp.1~13 (2008), Mosby
  5. Commission on Dental Accreditation, "Accreditation Standard for Dental Hygiene Education Programs", 17~21 (2009)
  6. 치과위생사 국가시험과 목개선 실행방안연구, "김숙향", 한국보건의료인국가시험원, 1~4, pp.연구간행물 RE3-0808-14 (2008)
  7. 치위생학의 교육표준화 및 발전방향, "김응권", 대한치과위생사협회·대한치위생(학)과 교수협의회, 74~85 (2004)
  8. 치위생학 및 치의학 통합교육의 현황 및 발전방향, "김숙향", 한국치위생교육학회, 20~24 (2009)
  9. 우리나라 치위생학 학문체계의 발전방향에 관한 연구, "대한치과위생사협회", 대한치과위생사협회·대한치과위생(학)과교수협의회, 72~83 (2009)
  10. 황미영, "치과위생사 통합교육과정 모형 접근에 관한 연구", 한국치위생학회지, 7(4), pp.595~609 (2007), 한국치위생학회
  11. 조영식, "임상구강위생 교육과정의 개발 방향", 한국치위생과학회지, 5(1), pp.33~38 (2005)
  12. 치의학교육평가원 현황 및 발전방향, "신제원", 한국치의학교육평가원, 10~25 (2009)
  13. 치위생교육 인정평가 기준 연구, "대한치과위생사협회", 대한치과위생사협회·대한치위생(학)과교수협의회, 8~42 (2007)
  14. American Dental Hygienists’Association (ADHA), "Standards for Clinical Dental Hygiene Practice", 3~16 (2008)
  15. CDAC(Commission on Dental Accreditation of Canada), "Dental Hygiene Programs Requirements", 42~46 (2008)
  16. CDHA(Canada Dental Hygienist Association), "definition: Definition, Scope, and Practice Standards", 3~10 (2008)
  17. ADEA(American Dental Education Association), "Compendium of Curriculum Guidelines", pp.10~20 (2005), Allied Dental Education Programs
  18. 김숙향, "임상치위생학", pp.3~14 (2007), 대한나래출판사
  19. Wilkins E.M, "Clinical practice of the dental hygienist. 10th ed", pp.4~16 (2009), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  20. 한국치과위생사교육협의회, "대학 치위생과 학습목표", pp.165~258 (2001), 고문사
  21. Darby, M. L., "Dental Hygiene Theory and Practice. 3rd ed", pp.13~23 (2010), Mosby
  22. 한선영, "치위생과정(Dental Hygiene Process of Care)의 교육 실태와 인식 조사", 석사, pp.2008
  23. Dental Hygiene Diagnosis Position Paper, "American Dental Hygienists’Association", 1~3 (2005)
  24. 김숙향, "치과위생사 역할 중심 치과위생학과 교육과정 모형 개발연구", 박사, pp.1998
  25. 신선정, "전국 치위생(학)과의 예방치학 및 공중구강보건학 관련 교과목 교육현황 조사", 대한구강보건학회지, 31(2), pp.273~285 (2007), 대한구강보건학회
  26. 김숙향, "직무분석을 통한 치과위생사 국가시험 문항개발 기준연구", 보건의료교육평가, 2(1), pp.59~74 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)