모바일 OS사업자의 제3자 앱 마켓 등록 제한행위에 대한 공정거래법 적용방안 연구
A legal research on the application of the competition law against the restrictive practices of mobile OS operators to the third-party app market
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the penetration of smart devices such popular OS for mobile devices basedapplications such as Internet access and applications are free to install, haschanged the composition of the market as it is possible to run. These apps tobe purchased in order to receive a variety of services in smart devices, theapp can deal app developers enrolled in the App market. But to attempt totransition from the dominance of the OS market in Appmarket. Market shareof Google’s Android is more than 70% globally and 90% in Korea’s case, thearrival time was needed to compete for a legal review of various policypackages and accounted for more than Google’s market share. To provideappropriate regulations for the IT business of such foreign country throughthe extraterritorial application of MRFTA provisions that have becomeimportant legal issues in the mobile app ecosystem. By the dominance of themobile OS market, act to deny the registration of the other apps in the appmarket competitors think the market is trading action for refusal to rule outa rival. And as a result, due to the consumer by limiting the registration ofthird-party app market competitors could disadvantage consumers by makinguse of its app market instead of a third party app market. These actions needto be appropriately regulated as other acts that interfere with the businessactivities of the operators as market dominant position abuse.
Abstract
As the penetration of smart devices such popular OS for mobile devices basedapplications such as Internet access and applications are free to install, haschanged the composition of the market as it is possible to run. These apps tobe purchased in order to receive a variety of services in smart devices, theapp can deal app developers enrolled in the App market. But to attempt totransition from the dominance of the OS market in Appmarket. Market shareof Google’s Android is more than 70% globally and 90% in Korea’s case, thearrival time was needed to compete for a legal review of various policypackages and accounted for more than Google’s market share. To provideappropriate regulations for the IT business of such foreign country throughthe extraterritorial application of MRFTA provisions that have becomeimportant legal issues in the mobile app ecosystem. By the dominance of themobile OS market, act to deny the registration of the other apps in the appmarket competitors think the market is trading action for refusal to rule outa rival. And as a result, due to the consumer by limiting the registration ofthird-party app market competitors could disadvantage consumers by makinguse of its app market instead of a third party app market. These actions needto be appropriately regulated as other acts that interfere with the businessactivities of the operators as market dominant position abuse.
참고문헌 (23)
- 권오승, "독점규제법(제3판)" (2013), 법문사
- 신현윤, "경제법(제6판)" (2013), 법문사
- 거래거절규제의 법리와 경제분석, "이재형", 한국개발연구원, ~ (2005)
- 박정구, "국제적 M&A의 동향과 경쟁법의 역외적용", 한림법학, 17 (2006)
- 박정원, "최근 경쟁법의 주요쟁점과 과제 ; 글로벌 IT 전쟁과 한국 전선의 급부상 -마이크로소프트, 인텔, 퀄컴의 시장지배적 남용행위 사건-", 연세 글로벌 비즈니스 법학연구, 3(2) (2011)
- 윤성운, "포스코 시지남용 건 관련 대법원 판결을 통해 본 경쟁제한성 입증의 문제", 경쟁저널, (137) (2008)
- 윤인성, "포스코열연코일 공급거절 판결의 주요 쟁점 및 향후 과제에 관한 소고", BFL, (30) (2008)
- 이상승, "경제적 효율성과 법의 지배" (2009), 박영사
- 이호영, "동아시아 3국의 경쟁법 역외적용의 현황과 과제", 법학연구, 30, pp.123~148 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- 이호영, "공정거래법상 시장지배적사업자 규제의 재점과 과제", 저스티스, (104), pp.75~99 (2008), 한국법학원
- 홍명수, "시장지배적 지위 남용으로서 거래거절의 의의와 위법성 판단", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.737~765 (2010), 법학연구소
- 황태희, "방송·통신 서비스의 결합판매에 대한 경쟁법적 검토 - 끼워팔기 법리를 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 27, pp.206~227 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
- Arndt, "TKG Kommentar" (2008), ESV
- Gavil, "Antitrust law in perspective : Cases, Concepts and problems in competition policy" (2008), Thomson West
- Elhauge, "Global competition law and economics" (2011), Hart Publishing
- O’Donoghue, "The law and economics of Art" (2013), Hart Publishing
- 根岸哲, "獨占禁止法槪說" (2008), 有斐閣
- Au, T, "Anticompetitive tying and bundling arrangements in the smartphone industry", Stan. Tech. L. Rev, 16, pp.188~ (2012)
- Brennan, "Essential facilities and trinko : should antitrust and regulation be combined?", Fed. Comm. L.J, 61, pp.133~ (2008)
- Tying, exclusive dealing and franchising issues, "A. Cantor", PLI, ~, pp.No. 14450 (2008)
- McMahon, "Interoperability: ‘indispensability’ and ‘special responsibility’ in high technology markets", Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop, 9 (2007)
- Paal, "Immaterialgüter, Internetmonopole und Kartellrecht", pp.873~ (2013), GRUR
- Xu Ming, "중국 앱 마켓 현황과 관련산업제도", 한국게임법정책학회 하계세미나 (2014)