경쟁법과 개인정보보호법의 상충과 조화 -빅테크 기업들의 개인정보보호 강화조치에 대한 검토를 중심으로-
Clash and Balance between Competition Law and Personal Information Protection Law: With a Focus on the Strengthened Privacy Protection Measures of Big Tech Companies
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As we steadily move towards a data-driven economy, there has been growing awareness of personal data protection. Governments are increasing their level of regulations to better protect user privacy, introducing such measures as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). These regulations typically aim to increase transparency and control over user data, and big tech companies such as Google and Apple have responded with stronger privacy protection measures, which essentially involve not sharing user data with the rest of the market. These strengthened privacy measures aim to protect the personal information of users but have made it difficult for competitors to access the data that big tech companies have generated about users. Now there is controversy regarding whether these privacy protection measures are being used as a tool for big tech firms to monopolize the data market in violation of the competition law. The interplay between competition and privacy law has come into spotlight very recently, and there are no established principles for reconciling these two areas of law. As such, this paper seeks to explore the potential tensions between competition and privacy law in the context of data monopolies and to identify possible solutions for balancing these competing interests.
Abstract
As we steadily move towards a data-driven economy, there has been growing awareness of personal data protection. Governments are increasing their level of regulations to better protect user privacy, introducing such measures as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). These regulations typically aim to increase transparency and control over user data, and big tech companies such as Google and Apple have responded with stronger privacy protection measures, which essentially involve not sharing user data with the rest of the market. These strengthened privacy measures aim to protect the personal information of users but have made it difficult for competitors to access the data that big tech companies have generated about users. Now there is controversy regarding whether these privacy protection measures are being used as a tool for big tech firms to monopolize the data market in violation of the competition law. The interplay between competition and privacy law has come into spotlight very recently, and there are no established principles for reconciling these two areas of law. As such, this paper seeks to explore the potential tensions between competition and privacy law in the context of data monopolies and to identify possible solutions for balancing these competing interests.
참고문헌 (48)
- 고학수, "인공지능 시대의 개인정보보호법" (2022), 박영사
- 권오승, "독점규제법: 이론과 실무" (2022), 법문사
- 법무법인(유) 지평, "플랫폼 경쟁법" (2021), 박영사
- 온라인 플랫폼에서 데이터의 역할에 관한 고찰, "한은석", 한국공정거래조정원, ~, pp.2022 이슈 검토 제4호 (2022)
- 빅데이터 분야 경쟁실태 조사 및 비교연구, "황태희", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2018)
- 강정희, "온라인 서비스 시장에서의 개인정보 보호와 경쟁법 집행 – 소비자 선택(Consumer Choice) 패러다임의 적용을 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 31, pp.306~350 (2015), 한국경쟁법학회
- 강지원, "온라인 플랫폼 사업자의 자사우대에 대한경쟁법상 허용 범위의 한계 - 네이버쇼핑 사건과 EU Google Shopping 사건, 영국 Streetmap 사건을 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 44, pp.177~223 (2021), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
- 강태욱, "개인정보 보호의 법과 정책" (2016), 박영사
- 고학수, "국내 웹사이트의 이용자 정보수집 및트래킹 현황에 관한 분석", 법경제학연구, 14(3), pp.409~466 (2017), 한국법경제학회
- 권창환, "혁신시장에서의시장지배적지위남용에관한몇가지문제 -멜론 사례를 중심으로-", 법경제학연구, 10(1), pp.25~49 (2013), 한국법경제학회
- 류시원, "기업의 프라이버시 증진 활동의 경쟁법 쟁점: 탐색적 고찰", 고려법학, (101), pp.113~160 (2021), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 문병순, "행태 데이터의 수집 방식과 규제 방안 ―쿠키를 중심으로―", 증권법연구, 23(1), pp.287~310 (2022), 한국증권법학회[DOI]
- 신영수, "빅데이터의 경쟁제한효과에 대한 법적 판단기준 연구", 법학논고, (69), pp.343~372 (2020), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 안정민, "온라인 맞춤형 광고(Online Behavioral Advertising)와 개인정보보호", 사이버커뮤니케이션학보, 30(4), pp.43~86 (2013), 사이버커뮤니케이션학회
- 안정민, "맞춤형 광고와 개인정보보호 ― 미국 사례와의 비교를 중심으로 ―", 미국헌법연구, 28(3), pp.111~149 (2017), 미국헌법학회
- 오승한, "SK 이동통신의 휴대폰 폐쇄 DRM 장착행위의 경쟁제한성판단 - 판례평석: 서울고등법원 2007. 12. 27. 선고 2007누8623 판결(대법원 2011. 10. 13. 선고 2008두1832 판결 확정) -", 경쟁법연구, 28, pp.3~60 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
- 이동진, "법의 딜레마" (2020), 법문사
- 이봉의, "디지털플랫폼의 자사 서비스 우선에 대한 경쟁법의 쟁점 - Monopoly Leverage와 Equal Treatment를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 30(3), pp.365~407 (2020), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 이진규, "Google의 FLoc 적용과 프라이버시 고려사항", DATA & AI Governance, (2) (2021), 서울대학교 인공지능정책 이니셔티브
- 이호영, "빅데이터의 경쟁법적 함의에 관한 연구", 법경제학연구, 15(3), pp.293~330 (2018), 한국법경제학회[DOI]
- 이효석, "데이터 독점과 경쟁법의 적용", 법학논고, (77), pp.185~213 (2022), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 임 용, "데이터 독점과 공유 - 경쟁법상 시정책으로서의 데이터 공유조치의 문제", 한국법학원 제13회 한국법률가대회 자료집 (2022)
- 정상조, "광고기술의 발전과 개인정보의 보호", 저스티스, (106), pp.601~623 (2008), 한국법학원
- 한국방송통신전파진흥원, "미국 빅테크 기업들에 대한 반독점 이슈 진단", 미디어 이슈 & 트렌드, 40 (2020)
- 홍대식, "인터넷 플랫폼 시장에서의 경쟁법 적용을 위한 소비자 선택 기준", 경쟁법연구, 27, pp.257~290 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
- 홍대식, "데이터 이코노미" (2017), 한스미디어
- 데이터 독점 관련 경쟁법 이슈 연구, "홍대식", 법․경제분석그룹(LEG), ~ (2020)
- 황태희, "시장지배적 사업자의 이윤압착 행위의 부당성 판단", 사법, 1(38), pp.699~734 (2016), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- Bundeskartellamt and Autorité de la concurrence, "Competition Law and Data", ~ (2016)
- Online platforms and digital advertising, Market study final report, "Competition and Markets Authority", ~ (2020)
- European Data Protection Supervisory(EDPS), "Privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data: The interplay between data protection, competition law and consumer protection in the Digital Economy", Preliminary Opinion, ~ (2014)
- Fatur, Andrej, "EU Competition Law and the Information and Communication Technology Network Industries: Economic versus Legal Concepts in Pursuit of (Consumer) Welfare" (2012), Hart Publishing
- Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion?, Understanding the Issues, "Federal Trade Commission", FTC, ~ (2016)
- German Monopolies Commission(Monopolkommission), "Competition Policy: The challenge of digital markets, with a summary in English", ~ (2015)
- Maria Wasastjerna, "Competition, Data and Privacy in the Digital Economy: Towards a Privacy Dimension in Competition Policy?" (2020), Wolters Kluwer
- "Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition" (2007)[URL]
- World Economic Forum, "Personal Data: The Emergence of a New Asset Class", ~ (2011)
- Neil W. Averitt, "Using the Consumer Choice Approach to Antitrust Law", Antitrust Law Journal, 74(1) (2007)
- "The Counterfactual Method in EU Competition Law: The Cornerstone of the Effects-Based Approach" (2011)[URL]
- Google as a de facto Privacy Regulator: Analyzing Chrome’s Removal of Third-party Cookies from an Antitrust Perspective, "Geradin, Damien", TILEC, ~, pp.TILEC Discussion Paper No. DP2020-034 (2020)
- Dae-Sik Hong, "Multi-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology: Insights on Innovation, Competition and Policy: Perspectives from Academicians, Practitioners and Policymakers" (2018), Springer
- "Goodbye Tracking? Impact of iOS App Tracking Transparency and Privacy Labels" (2022)[URL]
- Maureen K. Ohlhausen, "THE EVOLUTION OF ANTITRUST IN THE DIGITAL ERA, Volume One" (2020), Competition Policy International
- Steven C. Salop, "Potential Competition and Antitrust Analysis", presented at the 135th OECD Competition Committee meeting (2021)
- Daniel Sokol, "Harming Competition and Consumers Under the Guise of Protecting Privacy: An Analysis of Apple’s iOS 14 Policy Updates", CPI Columns, ~ (2021)
- Daniel Sokol, "Harming Competition and Consumers Under The Guise of Protecting Privacy: Review of Empirical Evidence", CPI Antitrust Chronicle, ~ (2022)
- Swire, P., "Protecting Consumers: Privacy matters in antitrust analysis", CCTr. for Am. Progress, ~ (2007)
- Carlton A. Varner, "California Antitrust &Unfair Competition Law, Sheppard, Mullin" (2003), Richter & Hampton LLP