EU 디지털 시장법 시행에 따른 경쟁법 적용의 문제 - 데이터 독점과 개인정보 보호의 문제를 중심으로 -
A Critical Analysis of the issue of competition law application arising from the enforcement of the EU Digital Market Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the EU's approach to deal with data monopolies that occur through a few of big online platform companies in the digital transformation era. Big online platform companies such as GAFAM(Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microfsoft) typically operate by trading goods and services in virtual spaces based on digital networks to generate profits. Until recently, the need for regulation of these platforms was considered as inevitable, and the EU has been attempting to establish special regulations targeting these big online platform companies. These efforts has been regulated based on anti-competitive forms, such as data monopolies, including Facebook case in Germany in 2019 and recent amendments to GWB in Germany in response to the EU DMA. These attempts were made by the reason that traditional competition law measures cannot reflect the new characteristics of the many new cases related with big online platforms, which have a significant influence as a new business model in the digital transformation era. Unlike types using the data they have acquired in an anti-competitive form, the recent objects covered by the 2019 German Facebook case and the EU DMA are related to data collected and utilized in the process of collecting personal information, and artificial intelligence's role has been increasing, raising questions about compatibility with competition law. Becuase EU DMA adopts GDPR, so there is a possibility of duplication of regulations on data collection and utilization, and above all, the EU is announcing that it will legislate on the artificial intelligence which treats Data Protection involved in the process through the bill. Therefore, practical considerations are needed on the relationship between these series of data-related laws and competition law regulations. These aspects are significant in Korea, which aims to legislate regulations on online platforms for transactions.
Abstract
This paper discusses the EU's approach to deal with data monopolies that occur through a few of big online platform companies in the digital transformation era. Big online platform companies such as GAFAM(Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microfsoft) typically operate by trading goods and services in virtual spaces based on digital networks to generate profits. Until recently, the need for regulation of these platforms was considered as inevitable, and the EU has been attempting to establish special regulations targeting these big online platform companies. These efforts has been regulated based on anti-competitive forms, such as data monopolies, including Facebook case in Germany in 2019 and recent amendments to GWB in Germany in response to the EU DMA. These attempts were made by the reason that traditional competition law measures cannot reflect the new characteristics of the many new cases related with big online platforms, which have a significant influence as a new business model in the digital transformation era. Unlike types using the data they have acquired in an anti-competitive form, the recent objects covered by the 2019 German Facebook case and the EU DMA are related to data collected and utilized in the process of collecting personal information, and artificial intelligence's role has been increasing, raising questions about compatibility with competition law. Becuase EU DMA adopts GDPR, so there is a possibility of duplication of regulations on data collection and utilization, and above all, the EU is announcing that it will legislate on the artificial intelligence which treats Data Protection involved in the process through the bill. Therefore, practical considerations are needed on the relationship between these series of data-related laws and competition law regulations. These aspects are significant in Korea, which aims to legislate regulations on online platforms for transactions.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김진우, "유럽연합 인공지능법안에 따른 고위험 인공지능 시스템 공급자 등의 의무", 과학기술과 법, 12(2), pp.111~152 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 고학수, "유럽연합 인공지능법안의 개요 및 대응방안", DAIG, (2) (2021)
- 김성현, "EU GDPR과 국내 개인정보보호 법제 비교분석", 융합보안 논문지, 18(5), pp.83~92 (2018), 한국융합보안학회
- 김지홍, "플랫폼 경쟁법" (2021), 법무법인(유) 지평, 박영사
- 박혜성, "인공지능 규제에 대한 연구 ― 유럽연합의 입법안을 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 49(3), pp.349~374 (2021), 한국공법학회[DOI]
- EU 인공지능 규제안의 주요 내용과 시사점, "이경선", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.No. 1 (2021)
- 이봉의, "공정거래법" (2022), 박영사
- 이봉의, "독일경쟁법" (2016), 법문사
- 이성엽, "데이터와 법" (2021), 박영사
- 이성엽, "플랫폼의 법과 정책" (2022), 박영사
- 이효석, "데이터 독점과 경쟁법의 적용", 법학논고, (77), pp.185~213 (2022), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 유영국, "독일 경쟁제한방지법 제10차 개정(안)의 주요 내용과 독점규제법상 시사점", 경쟁법연구, 42, pp.216~256 (2020), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
- 유영국, "GAFA 등 디지털 콘체른(Digitalkonzerne)에 대한 독일 경쟁제한방지법(GWB)상 남용감독 강화와 그 시사점 - 개정 GWB 제19a조 및 제73조 제5항 등을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 34(3), pp.289~330 (2021), 한국상사판례학회
- 유진희, "온라인 플랫폼 사업자의 이용자 데이터 보호 위반행위와경쟁법의 적용 - 독일 Facebook 사건을 중심으로 -", 경제법연구, 20(2), pp.117~140 (2021), 한국경제법학회[DOI]
- 정소영, "유럽연합 인공지능법안의 거버넌스 분석 - 유럽인공지능위원회와 회원국 감독기관의 역할과 기능을 중심으로 -", 연세법학, (39), pp.33~65 (2022), 연세법학회
- 채성희, "온라인 플랫폼과 맞춤형 광고에 관한 공정거래법 및 개인정보 보호법 관점에서의 검토 - 독일 Facebook 사건을 중심으로 -", 경제규제와 법, 15(1), pp.123~154 (2022), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 최난설헌, "EU 디지털 시장법의 함의와 경쟁법의 역할", 선진상사법률연구, (100), pp.67~93 (2022), 법무부
- 최난설헌, "데이터와 법" (2021), 박영사
- White Paper on Artificial Intelligence-A European approach to excellence and trust, "European Commission", ~, pp.COM(2020) 65 final (2020)
- "EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5", 2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence(Artificial Intelligence Act) 18 June 2021, 2021
- Kahterine Forrest, "Big Data and Online Advertising: Emerging Competition Concerns", Competition Policy International (2019)
- Council of the European Union, "Presidency conclusions-The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the context of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Change, 11481", 20, 2020
- HLEG, "Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, 2019; HLEG, The Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment", ~ (2020)