한문 산문에서의 문예적 양기

Abstract

This paper examines literary yanggi(養氣) in the category of classical chinese prose. Yanggi(養氣) depends on situation and context, it is largely divided into ‘moralistic yanggi(養氣)’ in Confucianism and ‘yangsang(養生)'s yanggi(養氣)’ in Taoism. Apart from this, ‘literary yanggi(養氣)’ crosses the boundaries of moralistic yanggi(養氣) and yangsang(養生)'s yanggi(養氣). The notion of yanggi(養氣), which was discussed in the moral category, changed into a literary category. The momentum was a Chinese literary man such as Sa, macheon(司馬遷) and So, cheol(蘇轍). Korea has accepted these discussions in China, and related materials are included in various documents from the Koryo period to the Chosun dynasty. However, the aspect and the meaning are varied according to the situation of the times and the style of the literature. This paper does not concentrate on these aspects and meanings, but suggests various development ways of literary yanggi(養氣) in the category of classical chinese prose. It also examines the aesthetic style terms that are evaluated as the result of literary There are three development ways for the literary yanggi(養氣): The first is an outward experience that includes far travels and contact various opinions. The second is an internal introspection that develops the writer's emotion and vigord. The third is a reading of related books that helps yanggi(養氣). At the end, the aesthetic style terms were compared and analyzed. For example, there are the following style terms. There are sotang(疏蕩), gigi(奇氣), goengbag(宏博), hongbyeon(弘辯), honho(渾浩), sunbang(淳厖), etc.