6.25전쟁 기간 중 미국의 대한 군사정책이 한국해군력에 미친 영향 -작전·전술교리 및 전문인력을 중심으로-
The Influence of the United States Military Policies for the Republic of Korea upon the ROK Naval Power during the Korean War - Focused on the Operations, Tactics Doctrine and Professional Manpower -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the end of the World War Ⅱ, the United States occupied South Korea and passively supported South Korea with military assistance after due consideration of the political and military dynamic relationship with the Communist power. After North Korea's invasion broke out in 1950 on the Korean Peninsula, the United States judged it as a challenge from the Communist power and dispatched troops, supported the Republic of Korea (ROK) with military assistance actively. The United States received a commission of operational control authority from United Nations and conducted a war with the UN Forces under the command of the US to achieve the objective of war which was to repulse the North Korean People's Army (NKPA) behind the latitude 38 degrees north and regain the territories. The US established the operational command system, and chose a direct military assistance method by the US Forces such as tanks, warships, aircraft, ammunition and oil for the participants in a war at the local areas in order to attain the objective of war effectively. Meanwhile, as the war was prolonged and temporarily suspended, KMAG made an effort to cultivate a manpower of the ROK Armed Forces that ROK independently operate its military for the future. Then, the US, who judged that the objective of war had been achieved, concluded the Armistice Agreement with the Chinese Communist Forces and the NKPA, and also entered into the Mutual Defense Treaty with the ROK as its measure. In this way, the strategies and policies that the US carried out during the war had an impact on the development of ROK Naval Power as well as after the Armistice Agreement. The influence can be divided into two categories, short-term impacts during the war and long-term impacts after the armistice, As for the short-term impacts during the war, a primary factor on each part and reinforcement level of ROK Naval Power is as follows. 1. The main factor of the development of the ROK Navy's operational and tactical doctrine is the combined operations of the United Nation Navy. The ROK Navy was able to acquire the operational and tactical doctrine of an advanced navy through a variety combined operations such as blockades, convoy operations, amphibious operations, mine sweeping operations and naval gunfire support operations. Also, the ROK Navy originally exploited operational and tactical doctrine that is suitable for the geographical conditions in Korean Peninsular. It was a huge acquisition that the ROK Navy obtained the doctrine in a short period of three years whereas other advanced nations had developed for several decades. 2. The support from KMAG affected the cultivation of manpower of the ROK Navy. The ROK's superior manpower went abroad for study in the US military school with the support from the KMAG to cultivate the specialists of each military branch. The trained manpower fulfilled a important role of building naval power, and also became the teachers after the armistice. As a result, the Korean War was the crucial turning point in the development of the ROK Navy from a historical point of view. Because the ROK Navy was able to have the ability to defend its own territorial waters independently as a sovereign nation due to the United States' policy and support during the war.
Abstract
With the end of the World War Ⅱ, the United States occupied South Korea and passively supported South Korea with military assistance after due consideration of the political and military dynamic relationship with the Communist power. After North Korea's invasion broke out in 1950 on the Korean Peninsula, the United States judged it as a challenge from the Communist power and dispatched troops, supported the Republic of Korea (ROK) with military assistance actively. The United States received a commission of operational control authority from United Nations and conducted a war with the UN Forces under the command of the US to achieve the objective of war which was to repulse the North Korean People's Army (NKPA) behind the latitude 38 degrees north and regain the territories. The US established the operational command system, and chose a direct military assistance method by the US Forces such as tanks, warships, aircraft, ammunition and oil for the participants in a war at the local areas in order to attain the objective of war effectively. Meanwhile, as the war was prolonged and temporarily suspended, KMAG made an effort to cultivate a manpower of the ROK Armed Forces that ROK independently operate its military for the future. Then, the US, who judged that the objective of war had been achieved, concluded the Armistice Agreement with the Chinese Communist Forces and the NKPA, and also entered into the Mutual Defense Treaty with the ROK as its measure. In this way, the strategies and policies that the US carried out during the war had an impact on the development of ROK Naval Power as well as after the Armistice Agreement. The influence can be divided into two categories, short-term impacts during the war and long-term impacts after the armistice, As for the short-term impacts during the war, a primary factor on each part and reinforcement level of ROK Naval Power is as follows. 1. The main factor of the development of the ROK Navy's operational and tactical doctrine is the combined operations of the United Nation Navy. The ROK Navy was able to acquire the operational and tactical doctrine of an advanced navy through a variety combined operations such as blockades, convoy operations, amphibious operations, mine sweeping operations and naval gunfire support operations. Also, the ROK Navy originally exploited operational and tactical doctrine that is suitable for the geographical conditions in Korean Peninsular. It was a huge acquisition that the ROK Navy obtained the doctrine in a short period of three years whereas other advanced nations had developed for several decades. 2. The support from KMAG affected the cultivation of manpower of the ROK Navy. The ROK's superior manpower went abroad for study in the US military school with the support from the KMAG to cultivate the specialists of each military branch. The trained manpower fulfilled a important role of building naval power, and also became the teachers after the armistice. As a result, the Korean War was the crucial turning point in the development of the ROK Navy from a historical point of view. Because the ROK Navy was able to have the ability to defend its own territorial waters independently as a sovereign nation due to the United States' policy and support during the war.
참고문헌 (26)
- 국방부 전사편찬위원회, "국방사 : 1950. 6-1961. 5" (1987), 국방부
- Glenn D. Paige, "The Korean Decision" (1968), The Free Press
- 북한인민군총사령부, "인민군공격작전의 정보계획(1950. 6. 20)", ~ (1950)
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "소련군사고문단장 라주바예프의 6·25전쟁 보고서, 제1권", pp.123~137
- 러시아 국방부, "러시아가 본 한국전쟁", pp.31~ (2002), 오비기획
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "6·25전쟁사, 제2권" (2005), 국방부
- 남정옥, "한미군사관계사 : 1871-2002" (2002), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- U.S Department of State, "Foreign Relations of the United States, vol Ⅶ" (1950), Government Printing Office
- Roy K. Flint, "The Tragic Flaw : MacArthur, The Joint Chiefs, and the Korean War", 박사, pp.1976
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "6·25전쟁사, 제3권" (2006), 국방부
- 해군본부 전사편찬관실, "대한민국 해군사, 행정편 제1집" (1954), 해군본부
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "6·25전쟁사, 제1권", pp.124~ (2004), 국방부
- 국방부 전사편찬위원회, "국방사 : 1945. 8-1950. 6", pp.333~334 (1950), 국방부
- Robert K. Sawyer, "Military Advisors in Korea : KMAG in Peace and War", pp.50~ (1962), Office of the chief of military history, Department of the Army
- Sawyer, "Military Advisors in Korea : KMAG in Peace and War", ~
- 백봉종, "미국의 대한군원정책 변화에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1981
- James A. Field Jr., "History of United States Naval Operations ; Korea", pp.58~59 (1962), Department of the Navy, Naval Historical Center
- 오진근, "손원일 제독", pp.329~ (2006), 한국해양전략연구소
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "6·25전쟁사, 제4권" (2008), 국방부
- Malcolm W. Cagle, "The Sea War in Korea" (1957), Naval Institute
- 김주식, "해군의 창설과 발전", 군사, (68), pp.209~250 (2008), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 김현기, "해병대의 창설과 발전", 군사, (68), pp.283~324 (2008), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 김재승, "진해고등해원양성소교사", pp.211~214 (2001), 도서출판 혜안
- 해군사관학교, "대한민국 해군사관학교 50년사" (1996), 해군사관학교
- 한용원, "창군" (1984), 박영사
- 해군본부 전사편찬관실, "대한민국 해군사, 행정편 제2집", pp.279~
