본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

낙동강 영산전투시 북한군의 도하작전 분석

A Study on the North Korean Peoples Army's Crossing Operation s in the Yeoungsan Battle

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The North Korean Peoples Army(NKPA) accepted and translated the Soviet Military Doctrine before the Korean War(1950~1953), and so the Soviet Military Doctrine affected the North Korea way of the battle. Particularly the “Crossing Operations" doctrine is an important matter because of the configuration of the Korea ground-Han River, Geum River and Nakdong River. And so the North Korea recognize the fact that crossing operations were important but they didn't have sufficient troops and equipment for this operations. But NKPA executed the crossing operation at early combat in Korean War by the military doctrine, NKPA's FM “Crossing Operations". Therefore this study show that how the military doctrine executed in the Nakdong Bulge Battle. The river crossing operations classify into two groups, elaborate- crossing and prompt-crossing operations. The Nakdong Bulge Battle at the NKPA's August Offensive was not elaborate-crossing, but prompt-crossing operations. The NK 4th Division could secure a bridgehead by surprise attack through the crossing Nakdong River in secret. But they didn't extend the bridgehead. At first reason is that they delayed the heavy equipment(like as tank and artillery) crossing operations because that they did not have equipment for this operations. The Second is that decision of Walker and counterattack of the Marine Brigade. The Nakdong Bulge Battle at NKPA's September Offensive was elaborate- crossing operations. They did make a thorough preparation the crossing operations for success. For example, they prepared the underwater bridge, raft bridge, personal equipment and others. Particularly their patrol get information about the enemy’s movements. Through this preparation of crossing operations and patrol, the NK 2nd and 9th Divisions also could secure a bridgehead. They could clear obstacles like enemy's tank and an artilleryman, separate US 2nd Division, and cross the heavy equipment. But NKPA didn't extend the bridgehead. The first reason is that their concept of the crossing operations was only division grade operations, not corps grade operations. If September Offensive was corps grade operation, they had hold the succeed division and so could gain a decisive victory at the Nakdong bulge. But they didn't. The secondary reason is that decision of Walker and counterattack of the Marine brigade.

Abstract

The North Korean Peoples Army(NKPA) accepted and translated the Soviet Military Doctrine before the Korean War(1950~1953), and so the Soviet Military Doctrine affected the North Korea way of the battle. Particularly the “Crossing Operations" doctrine is an important matter because of the configuration of the Korea ground-Han River, Geum River and Nakdong River. And so the North Korea recognize the fact that crossing operations were important but they didn't have sufficient troops and equipment for this operations. But NKPA executed the crossing operation at early combat in Korean War by the military doctrine, NKPA's FM “Crossing Operations". Therefore this study show that how the military doctrine executed in the Nakdong Bulge Battle. The river crossing operations classify into two groups, elaborate- crossing and prompt-crossing operations. The Nakdong Bulge Battle at the NKPA's August Offensive was not elaborate-crossing, but prompt-crossing operations. The NK 4th Division could secure a bridgehead by surprise attack through the crossing Nakdong River in secret. But they didn't extend the bridgehead. At first reason is that they delayed the heavy equipment(like as tank and artillery) crossing operations because that they did not have equipment for this operations. The Second is that decision of Walker and counterattack of the Marine Brigade. The Nakdong Bulge Battle at NKPA's September Offensive was elaborate- crossing operations. They did make a thorough preparation the crossing operations for success. For example, they prepared the underwater bridge, raft bridge, personal equipment and others. Particularly their patrol get information about the enemy’s movements. Through this preparation of crossing operations and patrol, the NK 2nd and 9th Divisions also could secure a bridgehead. They could clear obstacles like enemy's tank and an artilleryman, separate US 2nd Division, and cross the heavy equipment. But NKPA didn't extend the bridgehead. The first reason is that their concept of the crossing operations was only division grade operations, not corps grade operations. If September Offensive was corps grade operation, they had hold the succeed division and so could gain a decisive victory at the Nakdong bulge. But they didn't. The secondary reason is that decision of Walker and counterattack of the Marine brigade.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. David J.Seigle, "Pusan: "Stand or Die"", pp.137~138 (2000), 1stBooks Library
  2. Edwin P.Hoyt, "The Pusan Perimeter", pp.235~ (1984), Stein and Pay
  3. Roy E. Appleman, "낙동강에서 압록강까지" (2001), 육군본부
  4. Uzal W.Ent, "Fighting On the Brink:Defense of the Pusan Perimeter", pp.283~ (1996), Turner Publishing Company
  5. 소련군사고문단장 라주바예프의 6⋅25전쟁 보고서 제1권, "국방부 군사편찬연구소", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, 198~204 (2001)
  6. 소련군사고문단장 라주바예프의 6⋅25전쟁 보고서 제2권, "국방부 군사편찬연구소", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, 24~ (2001)
  7. 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "6⋅25전쟁사 제4권 금강-소백산맥선 지연작전", pp.109~203 (2008), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
  8. 6⋅25전쟁사 1~7, "국방부 군사편찬연구소", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, ~ (2004)
  9. 6⋅25전쟁사 5, 낙동강선 방어작전, "국방부 군사편찬연구소", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, ~ (2008)
  10. 6⋅25전쟁사 제5권 낙동강선 방어작전, "국방부 군사편찬연구소", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, 253~ (2008)
  11. 국방부 전사편찬위원회, "한국전쟁사 제2권", pp.479~ (1979), 신일출판
  12. 김광수, "북한의 한국전쟁수행' 연구를 위한 문헌 및 자료분석", 군사, 55(55), pp.61~103 (2005), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  13. 김광수, "한국전쟁 전반기 북한의 전쟁수행 연구", 박사, pp.2008
  14. 김광수, "한국전쟁 중 북한군의 기갑운용 연구", pp.57~ (2004), 화랑대연구소
  15. 러 국방부, "러시아가 본 한국 전쟁", pp.370~ (2002), 오비기획
  16. "강행도하" (1945), 민족보위성 군사출판부
  17. "강행도하", 민족보위성 군사출판부
  18. "북한군 교리 22-9-2『집단군(군단)⋅사(여)단』", 정보사령부, 258~ (2009)
  19. 온창일, "한민족전쟁사" (2007), 집문당
  20. 육군본부, "낙동강에서 압록강까지" (2001), 육군본부
  21. 육군본부, "군사용어사전", pp.601~ (1999)
  22. 일본 육전사연구보급회, "한국전쟁 2-부산 교두보 확보", pp.307~310 (1991), 명성출판
  23. 일본 육전사연구보급회, "『한국전쟁』제2권", ~
  24. 장준익, "북한 인민군대사", pp.145~ (1981), 서문당
  25. 정보사령부, "북괴군 군사상식", pp.311~
  26. 조선민주주의 인민공화국 민족보위성 총참모부, "장갑땅크 및 기계화부대 전투규정 제2부-대대, 련대, 려단", 113~ (1949)
  27. 조선인민군 총참모부, "야전규정", ~ (1945)
  28. "군사상식", pp.418~, 조선인민군군사출판사
  29. 주영복, "내가 겪은 조선전쟁", pp.83~84 (1990), 고려원
  30. 최용성, "낙동강 방어선 형성과정과 방어 성공 요인", 6⋅25전쟁 60주년 학술세미나, pp.33~38 (2010), 경상북도⋅육군3사관학교

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)