본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한미상호방위조약 체결을 위한 이승만 정부의 협상전략

Negotiation Strategy of the Syngman Rhee's Government for signing the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty

1

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The objective of this research analyses regarding Syngman Rhee Government's bargaining strategy for the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty. The currently critical security issues, such as the ROK Navy Ship Cheonan sinking event, 2015 years scheduled wartime operational control transition, the new vision strategic alliance 2015, demand realignment of the ROK-US alliance role and relationship. To accomplish this, the alliance's origins and the change process since has been formed originally required for the study. In particular, the start of the alliance, a mutual defense treaty, is essential for the analysis. In other words, it is suggestive that bilateral interactions between the ROK-US and the Syngman Rhee Government's bargaining strategy in the process of a conclusion of mutual defense treaty even if the time has much passed. In sum, the conflictual international order represented by the Korea War and vulnerable resource mobilization capability of the ROK in that time reduced the bargaining power of the Syngman Rhee Government in the course of the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty negotiation. However, despite the negative impact of these factors, Syngman Rhee Government used for resistance bargaining strategy in response to the United States's indirect pressure, such as brinkmanship and bluffing. The objective of this strategy for the US was trying to obtain maximum yield. In contrast, under direct pressure such as withdrawal of the US troops, the ROK Government used compliance and resistance strategy. Such flexible and cross political strategy was able to made the conclusion of the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty. Hereafter, the ROK will confront simultaneously in the North Korea's direct threat including asymmetrical weapon and nuclear weapons, with potential threat to the surrounding faced at the same time such as escalation of territorial conflict by neighboring, terror by hostile actor etc. In addition, due to defense reform and the wartime control transition conditions, the ROK defense policies will vary considerably. Under these circumstances, there is need to set pre-situation and need to develop appropriate coping strategies for the enlargement of security autonomy. Currently the ROK is the world's top 10 economies and international environment is also considering the vantage point of view compared with that time, it is necessary to appreciate again Syngman Rhee Government's negotiating strategy for achieving the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty.

Abstract

The objective of this research analyses regarding Syngman Rhee Government's bargaining strategy for the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty. The currently critical security issues, such as the ROK Navy Ship Cheonan sinking event, 2015 years scheduled wartime operational control transition, the new vision strategic alliance 2015, demand realignment of the ROK-US alliance role and relationship. To accomplish this, the alliance's origins and the change process since has been formed originally required for the study. In particular, the start of the alliance, a mutual defense treaty, is essential for the analysis. In other words, it is suggestive that bilateral interactions between the ROK-US and the Syngman Rhee Government's bargaining strategy in the process of a conclusion of mutual defense treaty even if the time has much passed. In sum, the conflictual international order represented by the Korea War and vulnerable resource mobilization capability of the ROK in that time reduced the bargaining power of the Syngman Rhee Government in the course of the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty negotiation. However, despite the negative impact of these factors, Syngman Rhee Government used for resistance bargaining strategy in response to the United States's indirect pressure, such as brinkmanship and bluffing. The objective of this strategy for the US was trying to obtain maximum yield. In contrast, under direct pressure such as withdrawal of the US troops, the ROK Government used compliance and resistance strategy. Such flexible and cross political strategy was able to made the conclusion of the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty. Hereafter, the ROK will confront simultaneously in the North Korea's direct threat including asymmetrical weapon and nuclear weapons, with potential threat to the surrounding faced at the same time such as escalation of territorial conflict by neighboring, terror by hostile actor etc. In addition, due to defense reform and the wartime control transition conditions, the ROK defense policies will vary considerably. Under these circumstances, there is need to set pre-situation and need to develop appropriate coping strategies for the enlargement of security autonomy. Currently the ROK is the world's top 10 economies and international environment is also considering the vantage point of view compared with that time, it is necessary to appreciate again Syngman Rhee Government's negotiating strategy for achieving the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 차상철, "외교가로서의 이승만 대통령. in: 이승만 대통령 재평가" (2006), 연세대학교 출판부
  2. 차상철, "이승만과 1950년대의 한미동맹. in:1950년대 한국사의 재조명" (2004), 선인
  3. 이호재, "한국 외교정책의 이상과 현실" (2000), 법문사
  4. 이상철, "안보와 자주성의 딜레마" (2004), 연경문화사
  5. 한표욱, "이승만과 한미외교" (1996), 중앙일보사
  6. 양대현, "한국전쟁과 한미동맹관계", 한국정치학회보, 26(1) (1992)
  7. 김일영, "이승만 정부에서의 외교정책과 국내정치: 북진, 반일 정책과 국내 정치경제와의 연계성", 국제정치 논총, 39(3) (1999)
  8. 홍용표, "국가안보와 정권안보: 이승만 대통령의 안보정책을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 36(3) (1997)
  9. 홍석률, "이승만 정권의 북진통일론과 냉전외교정책", 한국사 연구, (85) (1994)
  10. 이혜정, "한미동맹 기원의 재조명: 한미 상호방위조약의 발효는 왜 연기되었는가?", 한국정치외교사논총, 26(1), pp.5~36 (2004), 한국정치외교사학회
  11. James Rosenau, "'Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy,' in his The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy", pp.133~200 (1980), Nicholas Publishing
  12. Wilson Miscamble, "the Making of American Foreign Policy, 1947~1950", pp.220~221 (1992), Princeton University Press
  13. 황병무, "신중국 군사론", pp.39~40 (1995), 법문사
  14. 이종석, "현대북한의 이해: 사상, 체제, 지도자", pp.199~ (1995), 역사비평사
  15. Ministry of Foreign Affairs R.O.K., "Documents on Korea-United States Relations 1943~1965", ~ (1965)
  16. Maurice A. East, "Why Nations Act: Theoretical Perspectives for Comparative Foreign Policy Studies", pp.123~ (1978), Sage Publications
  17. 안용식, "한국 관료연구", pp.232~ (2001), 대영문화사
  18. 정승건, "한국의 행정개혁", pp.148~ (2003), 부산대학교 출판부
  19. 조석준, "미군정과 제1공화국의 수반관리기구에 관한 연구", 행정논총, 4(2), pp.131~ (1966)
  20. 제4기 연차보고서: 1950~1954, "한국은행", 한국은행 조사부, 12~15 (1954)
  21. 한용섭, "한국 국방정책의 변천과정. in: 국방정책의 이론과 실제", pp.73~ (2004), 오름
  22. 국방군사연구소, "국방정책 변천사", pp.72~ (1995), 국방군사연구소
  23. Astri Suhrke, "Gratuity or Tyranny: The Korean Alliances", World Politics, 25, pp.508~ (1973)
  24. Albert O. Herschman, "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Oganization, and State", pp.47~134, Harvard University Press
  25. Richard C. Allen, "Korea's Syngman Rhee: An Unauthorized Portrait", pp.157~ (1960), Charles Tuttle Co.
  26. 김일영, "전시정치의 재조명:한국전쟁 중 북진통일론과 두 갈래 개헌론의 관계", 한국정치외교사논총, 23(2), pp.193~225 (2002), 한국정치외교사학회
  27. 국사편찬위원회, "자료 대한민국사 29" (2007), 이문기업
  28. Council on Foreign Relations, "Documents on American Foreign Relation(1953)", pp.303~305 (1954), Harper Brothers
  29. Adams, Firsthand, "101 Eisenhower diary entry for July 24, 1953. in: The Eisenhower Diaries", pp.248~ (1981)
  30. Henry W. Brands. Jr., "The D. Eisenhower Administration, Syngman Rhee, and the 'Other' Geneva Confernce of 1954", Pacific Historical Review, 56(1), pp.82~ (1987)
  31. 갈홍기, "이대통령 각하 방미 수행기" (1955), 공보실
  32. "동아일보", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)