본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한정권 성립 이후 ‘통일’전략 논의와 전쟁 준비 - 1948년 9월부터 1950년 1월까지를 중심으로 -

North Korea’s Unification Strategy Discussion and War Preparation after the Establishment of Government - From September 1948 to January 1950 -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to explore how unification strategies were discussed among chief leaders in North Korea and how preparations for war were made along lines of these discussions during the period between the establishment of the North Korean regime and the outbreak of the Korean War. So far, the main academic debates about the war have been mainly on the origins and causes of the War. Based on the Soviet archive materials partially opened in the 1990s and “the captured North Korean Documents” which had not received much attention, many researchers have focused on the relations between North Korea and the Soviet Union surrounding the war and have made a long debate about who was the leader in determining the War. By contrast, researches on the unification strategy discussions and the mobilization for the War made within North Korea have not been conducted enough. For example, how the North raised the war fund and prepared war resources and materials before the starting of the war has never been studied. Furthermore, the relations between the unification strategy discussion and the actual ideological and material mobilization have not been identified. This paper is an attempt to fill the gap in historical knowledge on these subjects, based on a variety of historical source and personal testimonies. First of all, it should be noted that North Korea’s strategy discussion for unification was made almost simultaneously with the establishment of the regime. The leadership of the Government declared the “complete reconstruction of the country” and “national unification” as their policy priority among the new government’s political principles, right after establishing their government in September1948. In addition, the Labor Party determined the reunification of North and South Koreas and the extension of North Korea’s system to the whole country (both Koreas)to be their top priority. However, opinions of the concrete methods of unification were divided between the leading groups. The Manchurian Partisan faction including Kim Il Sung, Choi Yong-Gun, and Kang Gun insisted the unification through the Army's invasion of the South should be put first and that the South Labor Party’s partisan activities should assist this, while the South Labor Party faction including Park Hun Young claimed the South Korean partisans should over throw the ROK mainly through the people’s uprisings and that North Korea just aid this. During his official visit to Moscow in March 1949, Kim Il Sung suggested the unification by armed force to Stalin, but Stalin refused flatly to approve this by pointing out the unfavorable international situation and the agreement with the United States on keepingthe38th latitude division. He mentioned that if the South attacked first, the North’s counterattack could be allowed but the North should not make a preemptive attack on the South. After this, Kim IL Sung several times urged Stalin to approve his proposal of the unification by armed force but could not get the consent before the end of January 1950. Under these circumstances, Kim Il Sung was establishing the system of mobilization secretly having a war in mind, while supporting the South Labor Party’s partisan activities. Throughout the year 1949, the North leadership was making efforts very secretly to strengthen the mobilization system of the people and also putting time and energy on raising the fund to increase armaments and reserve war materials. The North Korean leadership presumed that the people of North Korea would have aversion on them if the North Korea invaded the South Korea first. Therefore, they were to deceive the people by propagandizing that young people should enlist in the military or be trained in the workplace to prevent the United States and South Korea from invading the North. Also, under the name of ‘the national physical fitness test,’ each department at all levels of the government was in charge of identifying the population to be mobilized to a war and making the military registration card. The Labor party, the Defensive Committee for Fatherland, and all the social organizations such as Democratic Youth’s Union, Women’s Union, and Farmers’ Union gave it their best shot through various meetings and brochures to incite the people to respond to this national policy. Furthermore, the North Korean leadership deceived the people to secretly accumulate funds for the war. In order to raise capital to purchase weapons of war from the Soviet Union, they sold government bonds to residents by making an excuse that the money was necessary for “loans for national economic development.” Also, in order to conceal their armament expansion and war fundraising, they announced only a portion of the actual defense budget as “Defense Fund for the Fatherland (National Defense Budget)”and hid the remaining funds into the other budget items. In 1949, the “Defense Fund for the Fatherland” was announced to be3.1 Billion won, 15% of the total expenditure 19.7 billion 26 million won, but the actual military spending amounted to 7.1 billion won. Besides, the money collected from the people in the name of' donation fund for military equipments, 'the loans of about 850 million won by barter from the Soviet Union, and 2.5 billion won collected for economic development in the name of national bonds were added to this military budget. Therefore, North Korea’s actual military expenditure in 1949 amounted to 10 billion 384 million 600 thousand won. At the same time, through various means, North Korea prepared enough War materials for People’s Army to carry out a war for two months with no difficulty. These were partly from the loans and partly from the people’s contributions in the name of' voluntary fund for military equipment. 'Thus, North Korea was able to stockpile supplies needed to sustain a short term War for duration of 2 months, such as food, fuel, ammunition, clothing, etc. However, it ran short of provisions for a longer term war.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore how unification strategies were discussed among chief leaders in North Korea and how preparations for war were made along lines of these discussions during the period between the establishment of the North Korean regime and the outbreak of the Korean War. So far, the main academic debates about the war have been mainly on the origins and causes of the War. Based on the Soviet archive materials partially opened in the 1990s and “the captured North Korean Documents” which had not received much attention, many researchers have focused on the relations between North Korea and the Soviet Union surrounding the war and have made a long debate about who was the leader in determining the War. By contrast, researches on the unification strategy discussions and the mobilization for the War made within North Korea have not been conducted enough. For example, how the North raised the war fund and prepared war resources and materials before the starting of the war has never been studied. Furthermore, the relations between the unification strategy discussion and the actual ideological and material mobilization have not been identified. This paper is an attempt to fill the gap in historical knowledge on these subjects, based on a variety of historical source and personal testimonies. First of all, it should be noted that North Korea’s strategy discussion for unification was made almost simultaneously with the establishment of the regime. The leadership of the Government declared the “complete reconstruction of the country” and “national unification” as their policy priority among the new government’s political principles, right after establishing their government in September1948. In addition, the Labor Party determined the reunification of North and South Koreas and the extension of North Korea’s system to the whole country (both Koreas)to be their top priority. However, opinions of the concrete methods of unification were divided between the leading groups. The Manchurian Partisan faction including Kim Il Sung, Choi Yong-Gun, and Kang Gun insisted the unification through the Army's invasion of the South should be put first and that the South Labor Party’s partisan activities should assist this, while the South Labor Party faction including Park Hun Young claimed the South Korean partisans should over throw the ROK mainly through the people’s uprisings and that North Korea just aid this. During his official visit to Moscow in March 1949, Kim Il Sung suggested the unification by armed force to Stalin, but Stalin refused flatly to approve this by pointing out the unfavorable international situation and the agreement with the United States on keepingthe38th latitude division. He mentioned that if the South attacked first, the North’s counterattack could be allowed but the North should not make a preemptive attack on the South. After this, Kim IL Sung several times urged Stalin to approve his proposal of the unification by armed force but could not get the consent before the end of January 1950. Under these circumstances, Kim Il Sung was establishing the system of mobilization secretly having a war in mind, while supporting the South Labor Party’s partisan activities. Throughout the year 1949, the North leadership was making efforts very secretly to strengthen the mobilization system of the people and also putting time and energy on raising the fund to increase armaments and reserve war materials. The North Korean leadership presumed that the people of North Korea would have aversion on them if the North Korea invaded the South Korea first. Therefore, they were to deceive the people by propagandizing that young people should enlist in the military or be trained in the workplace to prevent the United States and South Korea from invading the North. Also, under the name of ‘the national physical fitness test,’ each department at all levels of the government was in charge of identifying the population to be mobilized to a war and making the military registration card. The Labor party, the Defensive Committee for Fatherland, and all the social organizations such as Democratic Youth’s Union, Women’s Union, and Farmers’ Union gave it their best shot through various meetings and brochures to incite the people to respond to this national policy. Furthermore, the North Korean leadership deceived the people to secretly accumulate funds for the war. In order to raise capital to purchase weapons of war from the Soviet Union, they sold government bonds to residents by making an excuse that the money was necessary for “loans for national economic development.” Also, in order to conceal their armament expansion and war fundraising, they announced only a portion of the actual defense budget as “Defense Fund for the Fatherland (National Defense Budget)”and hid the remaining funds into the other budget items. In 1949, the “Defense Fund for the Fatherland” was announced to be3.1 Billion won, 15% of the total expenditure 19.7 billion 26 million won, but the actual military spending amounted to 7.1 billion won. Besides, the money collected from the people in the name of' donation fund for military equipments, 'the loans of about 850 million won by barter from the Soviet Union, and 2.5 billion won collected for economic development in the name of national bonds were added to this military budget. Therefore, North Korea’s actual military expenditure in 1949 amounted to 10 billion 384 million 600 thousand won. At the same time, through various means, North Korea prepared enough War materials for People’s Army to carry out a war for two months with no difficulty. These were partly from the loans and partly from the people’s contributions in the name of' voluntary fund for military equipment. 'Thus, North Korea was able to stockpile supplies needed to sustain a short term War for duration of 2 months, such as food, fuel, ammunition, clothing, etc. However, it ran short of provisions for a longer term war.

참고문헌 (97)

  1. 38연선무장충돌조사결과에 관한 조국통일민주주의전선조사위원회 보고서, , 노력자, ~ (1949)
  2. "공고한 평화를 위하여", 근로자, 3~8 (1949)
  3. "북조선로동당 강원도당 인제군당 상무위원회 회의록 제61호", 국립중앙도서관, ~ (1949)
  4. "북조선로동당 인제군 민청당조 회의록(50차)", 국립중앙도서관, ~ (1949)
  5. "비신스키가 스티코프 대사에게?(1950년 2월 9일), 한국전쟁 관련 소련극비외교문서(4)", 47~ (1950)
  6. "소련 내각회의 의장과 조선민주주의인민공화국 내각수상의 조소 양국관계의 발전 전망에 관한 회담 기록,1949년 3월 5일 20시 00분?, 한국전쟁,문서와 자료,1950~53년", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2003)
  7. "스티코프가 비신스키에게", ~ (1950)
  8. 조국보위를 위한 조선중앙통신사 종업원 궐기대회 보고서, , ~ (1949)
  9. "조국보위후원회 강령?(초안), 조국보위를 위하여", ~ (1949)
  10. "조국보위후원회 조선중앙통신사 제3차총회 회의록", 국립중앙도서관, ~
  11. "조국보위후원회 조선중앙통신사 초급단체 제2차총회 결정서", ~ (1949)
  12. "조국보위후원회 조선중앙통신사 초급단체 제2차총회 회의록", 국립중앙도서관, ~ (1949)
  13. "조선 민주주의 인민공화국 정강?, 조선중앙년감 1950년도판", 조선중앙통신사, ~ (1951)
  14. "조선민주주의인민공화국 내각 결정 제45호:조선인민군 전사 및 하사관들의 부양가족 원호에 관한 결정서?(1949년 5월 9일),국사편찬위원회 편, 북한관계사료집 21:내각공보", 443~445 (1948)
  15. "조선민주주의인민공화국 최고인민회의 선거총화와 당단체들의 당면과업에 대한 결정서", 근로자, 42~43 (1948)
  16. "툰킨이 소련외무성에 보낸 전문?(1949년 9월 14일), 한국전쟁 관련 소련극비외교문서 (3)", 29~
  17. "평양의 스티코프대사가 외무상 비신스키에게", ~ (1950)
  18. "흥남시서 제7호 각분서 파출소장 앞:군사등록사업에 대한 지시", ~ (1949)
  19. "흥내군 제29호 각분서파출소장 앞:군사등록게 기요사업에 대한 지시", ~ (1949)
  20. 운수과,「비서류철(秘書類綴)」NARARG 242, Box45, Document No.200991, , 1950
  21. 부상 겸 보안국장 박용삼,보안처장 주치옥,?내성보보공비 제220호 평특시 및 각도내무부장 앞:65호 공장 종업원 신분증 소지에 관하여?, "국립중앙도서관", 1949
  22. "정의의 전쟁과 부정의의 전쟁에 관한 맑스레닌주의적 학설" (1948), 로동당출판사
  23. "1949년 3월 7일의 회담, 서울신문", ~ (1995)
  24. 정준택, "외무성 앞:자동차조사에 관하여", 국립중앙도서관, ~ (1949)
  25. 국사편찬위원회, "쉬띄코프 일기 1946~1948" (2003), 국사편찬위원회
  26. 국사편찬위원회, "한국전쟁 ,문서와 자료", 41~42 (1950)
  27. 김광수, "한국전쟁 전반기 북한의 전쟁수행 연구-전략, 작전지휘 및 동맹관계", 박사, pp.2008
  28. 김광일, "조선민주주의인민공화국 기치를 높이들고 구국투쟁에 총궐기한 남조선인민들의 영웅적 투쟁", 근로자, ~ (1949)
  29. 김국후, "평양의 소련군정:기록과 증언으로 본 북한정권 탄생비화", pp.279~283 (2008), 한울
  30. 김남식, "남노당연구", pp.374~423 (1984), 돌베개
  31. 김두천, "인민군대에 복무하는 것은 조선청년의 최대의 영예다", 로동자, ~ (1949)
  32. 김석형, "나는 조선노동당원이요!", pp.268~271 (2001), 선인
  33. 김용국, "인민군대의 강화는 조국통일을 보장한다", 산업 (1949)
  34. 김일성, "우리는 자체의 힘으로 무기를 만들어 무장하여야 한다", 김일성저작집, 5, pp.297~301
  35. 김일성, "장기전에 대처한 후방보장대책을 철저히 세우자?(조선인민군 후방총국장조 상학 참가자들 앞에서 한 연설,1951년 4월 17일)", 김일성전집, 13, pp.342~ (1951)
  36. 김점곤, "남노당 폭력 혁명 노선의 연장선상에서 일어난 한국전쟁 , 한국전쟁:강대국 정치와 남북한 갈등", pp.61~62 (1989), 평민사
  37. 김점곤, "한국전쟁과 노동당전략" (1973), 박영사
  38. 나라사랑 편집부, "마르크스-레닌주의 민족이론", pp.313~384 (1989), 나라사랑
  39. 데이비드 M. 글랜츠, "독소전쟁사 1941~1945; 붉은 군대는 어떻게 히틀러를 막았는가" (2007), 열린책들
  40. 드ㆍ자이쎄브, "쏘베트동맹의 위대한 조국전쟁 전야에 있어서의 볼쉐위끼당", pp.86~107 (1949), 근로자
  41. 로동당 중앙본부 선전선동부, "공화국북반부의 장엄한 인민경제건설과 공채발행의 의의-강사들에게 주는 자료", ~ (1950)
  42. 로동당중앙본부 선전선동부, "조선인민들은 조국의 부강발전과 인민의 복리를 위한 국가공채를 발행할 것을 열렬히 환영하고 있다", ~ (1950)
  43. 리문일, "일층 치렬해진 남반부 인민유격대 활동과 높아가는 『국방군』의 의거기세", 로동자, (11), pp.59~ (1949)
  44. 리승엽, "반동의 지반을 소탕함으로써 평화적으로 조국의 통일을 달성하자", 근로자, (19) (1949)
  45. 리태준, "세계평화옹호를 위한 투쟁은 조국의 통일독립을 위한 투쟁과 일치된다", 로동자, (5월) (1949)
  46. 민족보위성 문화훈련국, "위대한 조국전쟁 시기에 있어서 쏘베트무력", ~ (1949)
  47. 박명림, "한국전쟁의 발발과 기원 I.II" (1996), 나남출판
  48. 박영, "전쟁 평화 및 혁명에 관한 볼쉐위크당의 리론과 진술", 근로자, (16) (1949)
  49. 박정애, "조국보위후원회 기관지 창간을 축하함", ~
  50. 박헌영, "동학농민란과 그 교훈" (1947), 해방사
  51. "북조선 로동당중앙본부 선전선동부 강연", ~
  52. "북조선로동당철원군어운면당부, 비망록(절대비밀)", 국립중앙도서관, ~
  53. 북한주재 소련대사관, "북한 주재 소련대사관 1등서기관 바쉬케비치와 박창옥의 대담록", ~ (1953)
  54. "산업성 제65호공장", 통지, ~ (1949)
  55. "슈티코프가 스탈린에게 보낸 전문 (1949년 5월 1일), 한국전쟁 관련 소련극비외교문서(4)", 18~ (1949)
  56. 승민, "미제국주의에 복무하는 남조선반동파의 최후발악", 근로자, (11), pp.31~48 (1949)
  57. 소련의 북한 군사지원, 한국전쟁사의 새로운 연구 1권, "신범식", 국방부 군사편찬연구소, 614~ (2001)
  58. 안소주, "남반부 빨찌산은 인민의 원쑤들을 소탕하면서 용감히 전진한다", 청년생활, (4월) (1950)
  59. 양영조, "한국전쟁 이전 38도선 충돌 1945~1950" (1999), 국방군사연구소
  60. 양한모, "「남노당」, 전환기의 내막", 조선일보사, 219~225 (1982)
  61. 엔 보즈네센스키, "조국전쟁시기에 있어서 쏘련의 전시경제" (1948), 재정성경영계산연구회
  62. 오학균, "조선 인민군대는 평화적 조국통일을 위한 조선인민의 승리의 담보이다", 농민, (10월) (1949)
  63. 와다 하루끼, "한국전쟁" (1999), 창작과비평사
  64. 외무부, "소련극비외교문서(3)", 29~34
  65. 이ㆍ민쓰, "쏘베트동맹의 위대한 조국전쟁" (1949), 로동당출판사
  66. 이ㆍ이노젠코브, "쏘베트동맹의 위대한 조국전쟁 시기에 있어서의 볼쉐위끼당", 근로자, (21), pp.79~99 (1949)
  67. 이완범, "한국전쟁:국제전적 조망" (2000), 백산서당
  68. 장학수, "붉은별 아래 청춘을 묻고", pp.165~166 (1990), 문학사상사
  69. 전남일보 광주전남현대사 기획위원회, "광주전남현대사 2", pp.134~184 (1991), 실천문학사
  70. 전현수, "해방 직후 북한의 과거청산(1945~1948)", 대구사학, 69, pp.33~60 (2002), 대구사학회
  71. 정병준, "한국전쟁:38선 충돌과 전쟁의 형성" (2006), 돌베개
  72. 정창현, "인물로 본 북한현대사", pp.125~126 (2002), 민연
  73. "조선중앙년감:1950년도판", 66~716 (1950)
  74. 조선중앙통신사, "조선중앙연감:국내편 1951~1952", pp.366~367 (1953), 조선중앙통신사
  75. 조일수, "리승만 매국도당을 소탕하기 위한 남반부 인민들의 무장투쟁", 농민, (11월) (1949)
  76. 존 메릴, "침략인가 해방전쟁인가, 1948~1950:한국전쟁의 국지적 배경", pp.272~ (1988), 과학과 사상사
  77. "남조선인민대표자대회 중요문헌집", pp.102~109 (1948), 인민출판사
  78. "한국전쟁 관련 소련극비외교문서 (3)", 13~15
  79. "한국전쟁 관련 소련극비외교문서 (4)", 46~47
  80. 한설야, "항구한 평화와 민주주의와 민족적 독립을 위하여", 근로자, (19) (1949)
  81. 한연, "조국의 평화적 통일을 달성키 위한 남반부 인민들의 투쟁은 날로 승리하고 있다", 농민, (10월) (1949)
  82. 허가이, "북조선로동당중앙위원회 제3차회의에서 진술한 조선민주주의인민공화국 최고인민회의 선거 총화와 당단체들의 당면과업에 대한 보고", 근로자, (9월), pp.34~36 (1948)
  83. 허가이, "북조선로동당중앙위원회 제3차회의에서 진술한 조선민주주의인민공화국최고인민회의 선거총화와 당단체들의 당면과업에 대한 보고", 근로자, (10), pp.15~ (1948)
  84. 현정민, "청년들은 “조국보위를 위하여”의 발간을 열열히 축하한다", 조국보위를 위하여, (창간), pp.29~32 (1949)
  85. 和田春樹, "朝鮮戰爭" (2002), 岩波書店
  86. 김한구, "흥내군비 제96호 각분서파출소장 앞:군사적령자미등록자 등록사업에 대하여", ~ (1949)
  87. 신상일, "흥남공비 제55호 각분서파출소장 앞:군사등록사업 보장의 건", ~ (1949)
  88. Alexandre Mansourov, "Communist War Coalition Formation and the Origins of the Korean War", 박사, pp.1997
  89. Bruce Cumings, "The Origins of the Korean War:Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945~1947" (1981), Princeton University Press
  90. Bruce Cumings, "The Origins of the Korean War, Vol.II : The Roaring of the Cataract 1947~1950" (1990), Princeton University Press
  91. Bukhtoiarov, "Uchastie", 30~
  92. Charles R. Shrader, "Communist Logistics in the Korean War", pp.61~65 (1995), Greenwood Press
  93. Geoffrey Roberts, "Stalin's Wars: From World War To Cold War, 1939~1953" (2006), YaleUniversity Press
  94. Soviet Aims in Korea and the Outbreak of the Korean War, 1945~1950: New Evidence from the Russian Archives, "Kathryn Weathersby", ~, pp.Cold War International History Project Working Paper, No.8 (1993)
  95. Kathryn Weathersby, "The Soviet Role in the Korean War: The State of Historical Knowledge, in The Korean War in World History" (2004), The University Press of Kentucky
  96. Norman Stone, "The Eastern Front 1914~1917" (1975), Hodder and Stoughton
  97. S. S. Lototskii, "Voina v Koree, 1950~1953", pp.745~764, Poligon

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)