본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선전기 군 사상자에 대한 보상제도 연구 -복호제를 중심으로-

The Study of Welfare for the killed and Wounded in the Early Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The feature of Joseon's nation system was the centralization of government. In the military system, the rising of government power increased the duty of remuneration for the killed and wounded. Government invented the new system said Bok-Ho(復戶). Bok-Hohadbeen made in the late14th century,when traditional military system that nation gave lands to soldiers award for their service had been collapsed. Government selected indirectly way, exemption of service instead of giving material award. This exemption system was fitted to The New dynasty Joseon's military system, that had drilling system free from giving land. Bok-Ho(復戶) system was established by law. It was contained in Gyeongjeyukjeon(經濟六典) and Gyeongukdaeajeon(經國大典) But compensation was very small, because Joseon's finance condition was poor. family of a killed only received exemption of military duty for 3 years and 3 seok(石) of rice and bean. Rice and bean were not remuneration but funeral expense. Bok-Ho(復戶) was exemption of military duty or employment by office. In the Joseon, one man per family had to serve, if family possessed three men who were capable of military service, from 16 to 60 year sold. During he served in military, two men staying at home were exempted from another order by office which requisite labor. ExceptBok-Ho(復戶) and funeral expense, Government didn't approve any material support, and diverting Bok-Ho(復戶) forward financial add. For instance, at first, Government ordered not to requisite men in Bok-Ho(復戶) family on work for product tributes. Then, from late 15C, product of tributes was changed. Government and people prepared tributes to collect tax, by which Government or officer bought necessary product. Government didn't approve exemption of this new tax, because this was not labor but money. In the view of this point, it is difficult to regard Bok-Ho(復戶) as real compensation system. Because even though Bok-Ho(復戶) was not exist, if a man had been killed or wounded,family had no man to serve except owing not less than 4 men. But family to have more than 4 men was a very few. Therefore Bok-Ho(復戶) could not help poor family in finance. Realmaterial help was only funeral expense.

Abstract

The feature of Joseon's nation system was the centralization of government. In the military system, the rising of government power increased the duty of remuneration for the killed and wounded. Government invented the new system said Bok-Ho(復戶). Bok-Hohadbeen made in the late14th century,when traditional military system that nation gave lands to soldiers award for their service had been collapsed. Government selected indirectly way, exemption of service instead of giving material award. This exemption system was fitted to The New dynasty Joseon's military system, that had drilling system free from giving land. Bok-Ho(復戶) system was established by law. It was contained in Gyeongjeyukjeon(經濟六典) and Gyeongukdaeajeon(經國大典) But compensation was very small, because Joseon's finance condition was poor. family of a killed only received exemption of military duty for 3 years and 3 seok(石) of rice and bean. Rice and bean were not remuneration but funeral expense. Bok-Ho(復戶) was exemption of military duty or employment by office. In the Joseon, one man per family had to serve, if family possessed three men who were capable of military service, from 16 to 60 year sold. During he served in military, two men staying at home were exempted from another order by office which requisite labor. ExceptBok-Ho(復戶) and funeral expense, Government didn't approve any material support, and diverting Bok-Ho(復戶) forward financial add. For instance, at first, Government ordered not to requisite men in Bok-Ho(復戶) family on work for product tributes. Then, from late 15C, product of tributes was changed. Government and people prepared tributes to collect tax, by which Government or officer bought necessary product. Government didn't approve exemption of this new tax, because this was not labor but money. In the view of this point, it is difficult to regard Bok-Ho(復戶) as real compensation system. Because even though Bok-Ho(復戶) was not exist, if a man had been killed or wounded,family had no man to serve except owing not less than 4 men. But family to have more than 4 men was a very few. Therefore Bok-Ho(復戶) could not help poor family in finance. Realmaterial help was only funeral expense.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 강진철, "사전지배의 제유형" (1980), 고려토지제도사연구 고려대학교 출판부
  2. "경국대전", ~
  3. "고려사", ~
  4. 국방군사연구소, "한민족전쟁통사 Ⅲ-조선시대 전편 , 제2장 야인정복전쟁", ~ (1996)
  5. 김성우, "세기 국가 재정수요의 증대와 재정운영의 위기?, 조선중기의 국가와 사족", pp.59~76 (2001), 역사비평사
  6. 김순남, "조선 成宗代 兀狄哈에 대하여", 조선시대사학보, (49), pp.35~63 (2009), 조선시대사학회
  7. 김순남, "조선 燕山君代 여진의 동향과 대책", 한국사연구, (144), pp.127~163 (2009), 한국사연구회
  8. "대전회통", ~
  9. "명종실록", ~
  10. "문종실록", ~
  11. 민현구, "조선초기의 군사제도와 정치" (1983), 한국연구원
  12. "삼국사기", ~
  13. "성종실록", ~
  14. "세종실록", ~
  15. 연세대학교 국학연구원, "경제육전집록", pp.222~223 (1993), 다음
  16. 오종록, "조선초기 병마절도사의 성립과 운용", 진단학보, 59, pp.60~ (1983)
  17. 오종록, "조선초기의 변진방위와 병마첨사ㆍ만호", 역사학보, 123 (1989)
  18. 有井智德, "李朝初期の?役?, 高麗李朝史の硏究", pp.125~126 (1984), 國書刊行會
  19. 有井智德, "李朝における復戶制の硏究, 高麗李朝史の硏究" (1984), 國書刊行會
  20. 육군본부, "한국군제사-근세조선전기편", pp.150~430 (1968)
  21. 윤훈표, "여말선초 군제개혁연구", pp.189~281 (2000), 혜안
  22. 윤훈표, "조선초기 경군의 편성에 관한 연구", 서울학연구, 2 (1994)
  23. 윤훈표, "경제육전과 육전체제의 성립", pp.173~ (2007), 혜안
  24. 이기백, "고려군역고, 고려병제사연구" (1968), 일조각
  25. 임영정, "여말선초의 사병?, 한국사론 7-조선전기 국방체제의 제문제" (1980), 국사편찬위원회
  26. 임용한, "?經濟六典續集詳節?의 간행과 그 의의", 조선시대사학보, (25), pp.5~34 (2003), 조선시대사학회
  27. 장학근, "조선시대 군사전략", pp.109~113 (2006), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
  28. "정종실록", ~
  29. "태조실록", ~
  30. "태종실록", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)