Government Administrative Control Tower in Crisis Management System: Definition, Issues, and Policy Implications
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A number of scholars and media in South Korea have recently raised questions regarding the necessity of a “government administrative control tower” (GACT) for dealing with crises. This paper aims to conceptualize GACT as a crisis management system and suggests administrative methods for improving this model by examining issues raised by its operation. Since the control tower is critical in times of crisis, this paper limits its focus to the role of GACT as a crisis management control tower. In crisis, an on-site control tower focuses especially on prevention, and on-site response and management must be synchronized with a higher-level administrative decision making control tower for the system to operate properly. While a fully authorized on-site control tower should serve as the central agent, a higher-level administrative decision making control tower should mobilize additional organizations and resources to support on-site capability. The operating principle for the latter should be to create an environment in which heterogeneous parties work together to make decisions about what to do rather than the president or the prime minister directly making orders and taking control.
Abstract
A number of scholars and media in South Korea have recently raised questions regarding the necessity of a “government administrative control tower” (GACT) for dealing with crises. This paper aims to conceptualize GACT as a crisis management system and suggests administrative methods for improving this model by examining issues raised by its operation. Since the control tower is critical in times of crisis, this paper limits its focus to the role of GACT as a crisis management control tower. In crisis, an on-site control tower focuses especially on prevention, and on-site response and management must be synchronized with a higher-level administrative decision making control tower for the system to operate properly. While a fully authorized on-site control tower should serve as the central agent, a higher-level administrative decision making control tower should mobilize additional organizations and resources to support on-site capability. The operating principle for the latter should be to create an environment in which heterogeneous parties work together to make decisions about what to do rather than the president or the prime minister directly making orders and taking control.
참고문헌 (21)
- Bea, K., "Federal emergency management policy changes after Hurricane Katrina" (2007), U.S. Congressional Research Service
- Bentz, B., "Supply-chain control towers help organizations respond to new pressures", Supply Chain Management Review, 18(4), pp.34~47 (2014)
- Goh, K., "Tales I want to leave behind", Joong Ang Ilbo, ~ (2013)
- Ha, H., "Reasons for reforming South Korea’s health administrative system", Korea Policy Forum, 150(18) (2015)
- IBM, "X-Force Threat Intelligence Quarterly", ~ (2015)
- Kang, O., "A review of control tower manuals in response to marine disasters", Marine Logistics Research, 30(4), pp.897~918 (2014)
- Kettl, D. F., "The transformation of governance" (2002), Johns Hopkins University Press
- "Kikuen Yang", ~ (2008)
- Kim, C., "The need for a national-level control tower in science and education", Science and Technology, 41(11), pp.100~101 (2008)
- Kim, J. H., "A study on the establishment of a cybersecurity control tower from a constitutional perspective", 석사, pp.2014
- Kim, M. K., "A metagovernmental study of the national crisis management system", Crisis management, 8(5), pp.53~82 (2012)
- Kim, S, "The Republic of Korea’s ocean policy: The need for an integrated control tower", Ocean Korea, 11, pp.11~ (2011)
- Ministry of Public Safety and Security, , ~ (2014)
- Moynihan, D. P., "Learning under uncertainty networks in crisis management", Public Administrative Review, 68(2), pp.350~365 (2008)
- 박상중, "차기정부의 “정보기술(IT) 및 콘텐츠 융합을 위한 IT 컨트롤타워”구축 제안", 디지털융복합연구, 10(1), pp.113~123 (2012), 한국디지털정책학회
- Powell, W. W., "Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12", pp.295~336 (1990), JAI Press
- Roberts, B., "A new approach to crisis management", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(4), pp.181~191 (2002)
- Schlesinger, A. M. Jr., "The Imperial presidency" (1973), Houghton Mifflin
- Seidman, H., "Politics, positions, and power" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Song, K., "Lessons from MERS", Korea Policy Forum, 150(16) (2015)
- Walker, J. S., "Three Mile Island: A nuclear crisis in historical perspective" (2004), University of California Press and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Library