Who Supports Administrative Information Sharing in Korea?: An Empirical Investigation of Citizens Profile
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Administrative information sharing is being promoted by the Korean government as an innovative measure to improve the quality of public service. At the same time, public concerns for privacy infringement are escalating. The core controversy is whether the policy can offer strong public goods to offset the cost of the potential infringement of privacy rights. Since it is citizens who will pay the cost of restricted privacy rights, according to the policy, administrative information-sharing should be designed and implemented thoroughly from the citizens’ perspective. In this context, this study aims to clarify factors affecting citizens’ policy-supportive attitudes toward administrative information-sharing. An empirical study was carried out and the results revealed that public trust in government, public opinion, policy benefit, and privacy concerns have significant effects on citizens’ support for the policy. The results are discussed in order to draw out policy implications for the successful implementation of administrative information-sharing in Korea.
Abstract
Administrative information sharing is being promoted by the Korean government as an innovative measure to improve the quality of public service. At the same time, public concerns for privacy infringement are escalating. The core controversy is whether the policy can offer strong public goods to offset the cost of the potential infringement of privacy rights. Since it is citizens who will pay the cost of restricted privacy rights, according to the policy, administrative information-sharing should be designed and implemented thoroughly from the citizens’ perspective. In this context, this study aims to clarify factors affecting citizens’ policy-supportive attitudes toward administrative information-sharing. An empirical study was carried out and the results revealed that public trust in government, public opinion, policy benefit, and privacy concerns have significant effects on citizens’ support for the policy. The results are discussed in order to draw out policy implications for the successful implementation of administrative information-sharing in Korea.
참고문헌 (28)
- Ajzen, I., "From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior" (1985), Springer Verlag
- Barber, B., "The logic and limits of trust. Piscataway" (1985), Rutgers University Press
- Carmines, E.G., "Reliability and validity assessment.Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.Beverly Hills" (1979), Sage Publications
- Chanley, V. A., "The origins and consequences of public trust in government", The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), pp.239~256 (2000)
- Clarke, R.A., "Information technology and dataveillance", Communications of the ACM, 31(5), pp.498~512 (1988)
- Culnan, M. J., "How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary unformation use", MIS Quarterly, 17(3), pp.341~363 (1993)
- Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, 13, pp.319~340 (1989)
- Fishbein, M., "Belief,attitude,intention,and behavior:An introduction to theory and research" (1975), Addison-Wesley
- Foxwall, G. R., "Cognitive style and extent of consumer use in organizations: Relevance of sufficiency of originality, efficiency, and rule-conformity", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, pp.491~497 (1992)
- Gamson, W. A, "Power and discontent. Homewood" (1968), The Dorsey Press
- Hetherington, M. J., "Political trust and racial policy preferences", American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), pp.253~275 (2002)
- Hunter, R., "World without secrets: Business, crime, and privacy in the age of ubiquitous computing" (2002), John Wiley
- Job, J., "How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament", Australian Review of Public Affairs, 6(1), pp.1~23 (2005)
- Kirton, M. J., "Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure", Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, pp.622~629 (1976)
- Kirton, M. J., "Adaptors and innovators in organizations", Human Relations, 33, pp.213~234 (1980)
- Kirton, M. J., "Kirton adaption inventory (KAl) manual" (2005), KAI Distribution Centre
- Mason, R.O., "Four ethical issues of the information age", MIS Quarterly, 10(1), pp.4~12 (1986)
- Mayer, R. C., "An integrative model of organizational trust", Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.709~734 (1995)
- Milberg, S. J., "Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation", Organizational Science, 11(1), pp.21~34 (2000)
- Miller, A. H., "Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970", The American Political Science Review, 68(3), pp.951~972 (1974)
- Miller, W. C., "Comparing IS innovation styles profile to other occupations", Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1993)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory" (1978), McGraw Hill
- Orwell, G, "1984" (1949), Harcourt, Brace & Co.
- Ploeg, I., "Biometrics and privacy", Information Communication & Society, 6(1), pp.85~104 (2003)
- Robinson, P., "Privacy, security, and trust within the context of pervasive computing" (2005), Springer Verlag
- Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" (1983), The Free Press
- Useem, B., "Trust in government and the Boston anti-busing movement", The Western Political Quarterly, 35(1), pp.81~91 (1982)
- Warren, S. D., "The right to privacy", Harvard Law Review, 4, pp.193~220 (1890)