What Determines the Tenure of Cabinet Members? A Comparative Study of Korea and the United States, 1948-2013
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article analyzes the determinants of the tenure of cabinet membersin Korea and the United States from 1948 to 2013. It concentrates on three sets offactors that can affect the tenure of cabinet members: the personal characteristicsof the cabinet member, his or her political characteristics, and the characteristicsof the president under whom the cabinet member serves. This article finds thatsome of the personal and political characteristics of the cabinet member affectthe length of a minister’s tenure in Korea. However, these same characteristicsdo not affect the length of tenure of cabinet members in the United States,although the characteristics of the president do have an impact on the tenurelength of cabinet members in both Korea and the United States. The mix of apresidential system with a parliamentary system in Korea perhaps accounts fordifference between the two countries. Therefore, this article raises the possibilitythat the theories and practices of public administration and political science inthe United States may not be applicable in Korea.
Abstract
This article analyzes the determinants of the tenure of cabinet membersin Korea and the United States from 1948 to 2013. It concentrates on three sets offactors that can affect the tenure of cabinet members: the personal characteristicsof the cabinet member, his or her political characteristics, and the characteristicsof the president under whom the cabinet member serves. This article finds thatsome of the personal and political characteristics of the cabinet member affectthe length of a minister’s tenure in Korea. However, these same characteristicsdo not affect the length of tenure of cabinet members in the United States,although the characteristics of the president do have an impact on the tenurelength of cabinet members in both Korea and the United States. The mix of apresidential system with a parliamentary system in Korea perhaps accounts fordifference between the two countries. Therefore, this article raises the possibilitythat the theories and practices of public administration and political science inthe United States may not be applicable in Korea.
참고문헌 (27)
- Alderman, R. K., "The timing of cabinet reshuffles", Parliamentary Affairs, 40(1), pp.1~19 (1987)
- Berlinski, S., "The length of ministerial tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945-1997", British Journal of Political Science, 37(2), pp.245~262 (1997)
- Blondel, J., "The profession of government minister in Western Europe", pp.153~174 (1991), Macmillan
- Box-Steffensmeier, J., "Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science", American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), pp.1414~1461 (1997)
- 최준영, "국무위원 인사청문회 제도의 문제점: 게임이론을 통한 분석을 중심으로", 신아세아, 13(3), pp.93~116 (2006), 신아시아연구소
- Cohen, Jeffrey E., "On the tenure of appointive political executives: The American cabinet, 1952-1984", American Journal of Political Science, 30(3), pp.507~516 (1984)
- Cox, D. R., "Regression models and life tables", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B, 34(2), pp.187~220 (1972)
- Grossman, M., "Encyclopedia of the United States cabinet" (2010), Greyhouse
- Hahm, S. D., "Exploring the determinants of the entry and exit of ministers in Korea, 1980-2008", Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(4), pp.657~675 (2008)
- Heclo, H., "The New American Political System", pp.87~124 (1978), University Press of America
- Huber, J. D., "Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies", American Political Science Review, 102(2), pp.169~180 (2008)
- Isaacson, W., "Kissinger: A biography" (1992), Simon and Schuster
- Jung, K., "Exploring the linkage between ministerial leadership and performance in Korea", Administration and Society, 40(7), pp.667~690 (2008)
- Jung, Y., "Public administration of the contemporary state" (2001), Bobmunsa
- Keman, H., "The profession of government minister in Western Europe", pp.99~118 (1991), Macmillan
- Kim, K. W., "Cabinet members in the Korean government: Role, qualifications, and competence", Korean Journal of Public Administration, 32(2), pp.36~49 (1994)
- Krause, G. A., "Presidential use of executive orders, 1953-1994", American Politics Quarterly, 25(4), pp.458~481 (1994)
- Light, P. C., "The president’s agenda: Domestic policy choice from Kennedy to Reagan" (1982), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Lewis, D. E., "The politics of presidential appointments: Political control and bureaucratic performance" (2008), Princeton University Press
- Marsh, D., "Re-assessing the role of departmental cabinet ministers", Public Administration, 78(2), pp.305~326 (2000)
- Micklethwait, J., "The right nation: Conservative power in America" (2004), Penguin
- Moe, T., "The new direction in American politics", pp.235~271 (1985), Brookings Institution
- 박대식, "제도적 대통령에 관한 비교분석: 미국과 한국을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 41(4), pp.67~87 (2007), 한국행정학회
- Peabody, B. G., "The twice and future president: Constitutional interstices and the twenty-second amendment", Minnesota Law Review, 83(3), pp.565~635 (1999)
- 성시영, "한국 장관의 퇴임사유 분석, 1948-2013", 한국사회와 행정연구, 25(1), pp.95~114 (2014), 서울행정학회
- Wood, B. D., "What determines how long political appointees serve?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), pp.375~396 (2008)