The Relationship between the Physical Growth of the Central City and Metropolitan Socio-Economic Growth in US Metropolitan Areas from 1950 to 2000
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines Rusk’s central city elasticity theory that the expansion of central city borders from annexations and consolidations relates to economic growth and development in US metropolitan areas. The theory, as explored and discussed in the literature appeared to lack an adequate and full range of empirical data to deeply or fully understand the relationship between his central city elasticity theory and metropolitan geo- and socio-economic conditions. Two major findings are that: central city elasticity levels are strongly supported over all five dependent variables for metropolitan geo- and socio-economic conditions for the both 92 central and 244 non-central neighboring cities. Accordingly, Rusk’s central city elasticity theory that metropolitan socio-economic conditions depend on the growth of central cities is championed. In conclusion, Rusk’s central city elasticity theory is an important contribution to explaining the relationship between central and non-central neighboring cities in US metropolitan areas
Abstract
This paper examines Rusk’s central city elasticity theory that the expansion of central city borders from annexations and consolidations relates to economic growth and development in US metropolitan areas. The theory, as explored and discussed in the literature appeared to lack an adequate and full range of empirical data to deeply or fully understand the relationship between his central city elasticity theory and metropolitan geo- and socio-economic conditions. Two major findings are that: central city elasticity levels are strongly supported over all five dependent variables for metropolitan geo- and socio-economic conditions for the both 92 central and 244 non-central neighboring cities. Accordingly, Rusk’s central city elasticity theory that metropolitan socio-economic conditions depend on the growth of central cities is championed. In conclusion, Rusk’s central city elasticity theory is an important contribution to explaining the relationship between central and non-central neighboring cities in US metropolitan areas
참고문헌 (33)
- Anas, A., "The costs and benefits of fragmented metropolitan governance and the new regionalist policies", Planning and Markets, 2(1), pp.6~10 (1999)
- Planning for smart growth 2002 state of states, "American Planning Association", American Planning Association, ~ (2002)
- Basolo, V., "US regionalism and rationality", Urban Studies, 40(3), pp.447~462 (2003)
- Briffault, R., "Localism and regionalism", Buffalo Law Review, 48(1), pp.1~30 (2000)
- Boyne, G., "Public choice theory and local government: A comparative analysis of the UK and the USA" (1998), St. Martin’s
- Blair, J., "The central city elasticity hypothesis", Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), pp.345~354 (1996)
- Burchell, R., "Sprawl costs: Economic impacts of unchecked development" (2005), Island Press
- Ciscel, D. H., "The economics of urban sprawl: Inefficiency as a core feature of metropolitan growth", Journal of Economic Issues, 35(2), pp.405~413 (2001)
- Clapson, M., "Suburbanization in global society" (2010), Emerald Group publishing Limited
- Crane, R., "Traffic and sprawl: Evidence from US commuting, 1985 to 1997", Planning and Markets, 6(1) (2003)
- Dreier, P., "Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century" (2001), University of Kansas Press
- Downs, A., "New visions for metropolitan america" (1994), Brookings Institution
- Feiock, R., "Rational choice and regional governance", Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), pp.47~63 (2007)
- Frey, W., "Metro America in the new century: Metropolitan and central city demographic shifts since 2000" (2000), Brookings Institution
- Kurban, H., "Do metropolitan areas with rich central cities Experience less sprawl?", Economic Development Quarterly, 21(2), pp.179~184 (2007)
- Levine, J. N., "The role of economic theory in regional advocacy", Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2), pp.183~200 (2001)
- Mookherjee, D., "Urban growth and metropolitan area in small metropolitan areas", Focus on Geography, 49(3), pp.29~36 (2006)
- Norris, D., "Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism", Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), pp.557~571 (2001)
- Orfield, M., "Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability" (1997), Brookings Institution
- Ostrom, V., "Local government in the United States" (1988), Institute for Contemporary Studies
- Perry, M., "Population change and distribution 1990 to 2000, census 2000 brief" (2001), US Census Bureau
- frostbelt public policies and market forces in metropolitan development, "Sunbelt", pp.2005, Pack, J. R.
- Parks, R., "Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structure in St. Louis and Allegheny county", Publius, 23(1), pp.19~39 (1993)
- Pinch, P., "Public sector restructuring and regional development", Regional Studies, 34(3), pp.267~275 (2000)
- Provo, J., "Planning for regional economic development", Critical Planning, 9, pp.55~70 (2002)
- Rusk, D., "Cities without suburbs: A census 2000 update" (2003), Woodrow Wilson Center Press
- Sclar, E., "You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization" (2000), Cornell University Press
- Stevens, J. P., "Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences" (2002), Lawence Erlbaum Association
- Swanstrom, T., "What we argue about when we argue about regionalism", Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), pp.479~496 (2001)
- Taylor, L., "The race to build: Infrastructure competition among communities", Economic Development Quarterly, 5(1), pp.60~63 (1991)
- Tiebout, C., "A pure theory of local expenditures", The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), pp.416~424 (1954)
- Todman, J., "Approaching multivariate analysis: An introduction for psychology" (2007), Psychology Press
- Warner, M., "Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice", Urban Affairs Review, 38(1), pp.70~89 (2002)