The Hierarchy-Oriented Bureaucracy of South Korea: A Type of Neo-Weberian State?
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the evolution and operational dynamics of South Korea’s bureaucracy through the lens of a neo-Weberian state (NWS) model. It argues that South Korea’s bureaucratic system, which is deeply rooted in Confucian hierarchical principles, has uniquely adapted to modern administrative challenges and reforms influenced by new public management (NPM) ideologies. This paper traces the historical trajectory from the Confucian meritocracy of the Chosŏn Dynasty to the contemporary handling of the COVID-19 crisis, encompassing various significant reform periods, with a focus on hierarchy variations: H1, H2, and H3. This analysis highlights how South Korea’s bureaucracy has managed to maintain efficiency and effectiveness while integrating market-driven and performance-oriented reforms. Furthermore, this paper discusses the bureaucratic response to “wicked problems”—complex social issues requiring multifaceted and innovative solutions—and demonstrates the bureaucracy’s adaptability in times of crisis. This is illustrated via an examination of key case studies, including the rapid implementation of COVID-19 drive-through testing centers, thereby showcasing the bureaucracy’s agility and effectiveness in crisis management. This paper ultimately supports the view that, despite global trends toward decentralization and deregulation, a strong hierarchical bureaucracy can effectively meet contemporary governance challenges, reflecting a distinctive NWS approach.
Abstract
This paper explores the evolution and operational dynamics of South Korea’s bureaucracy through the lens of a neo-Weberian state (NWS) model. It argues that South Korea’s bureaucratic system, which is deeply rooted in Confucian hierarchical principles, has uniquely adapted to modern administrative challenges and reforms influenced by new public management (NPM) ideologies. This paper traces the historical trajectory from the Confucian meritocracy of the Chosŏn Dynasty to the contemporary handling of the COVID-19 crisis, encompassing various significant reform periods, with a focus on hierarchy variations: H1, H2, and H3. This analysis highlights how South Korea’s bureaucracy has managed to maintain efficiency and effectiveness while integrating market-driven and performance-oriented reforms. Furthermore, this paper discusses the bureaucratic response to “wicked problems”—complex social issues requiring multifaceted and innovative solutions—and demonstrates the bureaucracy’s adaptability in times of crisis. This is illustrated via an examination of key case studies, including the rapid implementation of COVID-19 drive-through testing centers, thereby showcasing the bureaucracy’s agility and effectiveness in crisis management. This paper ultimately supports the view that, despite global trends toward decentralization and deregulation, a strong hierarchical bureaucracy can effectively meet contemporary governance challenges, reflecting a distinctive NWS approach.
참고문헌 (33)
- Bouckaert, G., "The neo-Weberian state: From ideal type model to reality?", Max Weber Studies, pp.13~59 (2023)[DOI]
- Bozeman, B., "A theory of Government “Red Tape.”", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), pp.273~303 (1993)
- Bozeman, B., "Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization", American Review of Public Administrative, 26(1), pp.1~17 (1996)
- Brynard, D. J., "Combating red tape in the Public Sector", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(4), pp.38~47 (1995)
- Cha, S., "Plan, planning, and administrative organization in a period of rapid economic growth : A critical grounded theory analysis", The Korean Public Administration Review, 52(4), pp.467~500 (2018)[DOI]
- Cha, S., "Preliminary study on Confucian meritocracy and personnel appointment during the Choson Dynasty", The Korean Public Administration Review, 55(2), pp.1~28 (2021)[DOI]
- Cho, S. J., "Theories of Korean Government Organizations" (2019), Bupmunsa
- Crozier, M., "Bureaucratic Phenomenon" (1964), University of Chicago Press
- DeHart-Davis, L., "Green Tape and Public Employee Rule Abidance", Public Administration Review, pp.901~910 (2009)
- Han, C., "The Changing Modes of Administrative Reform in South Korea", Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, pp.54~72 (2017)
- Han, S. Y., "The bureaucracy of the Japanese Government-General of Korea during"cultural politics" : Improvement of administrative efficiency", The Korean Public Administration Review, 50(3), pp.277~309 (2016)[DOI]
- Hejtmanek, M., "Rationalism and ‘Modernity’ in the State Examination System of Choson Korea: an Analysis of Munkwa Examination Roasters, 1545-1720", Journal of Governmental Studies, 19(3), pp.41~67 (2013)
- Im, T., "Bureaucratic Power and the NPM Reforms in Korea", International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), pp.89~102 (2003)[DOI]
- Im, T., "The Case for the Korean Bureaucracy", Korean Review of Organizational Studies, 6(3), pp.173~209 (2009)[DOI]
- Im, T., "Public Organizations in Asia" (2017), Routledge
- Im, T., "Key factors in understanding South Korea’s COVID-19 crisis management model : Scientific and political dimensions", Gestion et Management Public, 9(4), pp.11~22 (2021)[DOI]
- Kettle, F. D., "The Job of Government : Interweaving Public Functions and Private Hands", Public Administration Review (2015)[DOI]
- Kim, J. H., "Government Innovation and State", Social Resilience Enhancement after Disaster, KIPA Public Policy Review, pp.2020[DOI]
- Kim, S., "Administrative reform in South Korea : New Public Management and the bureaucracy", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), pp.694~712 (2015)[DOI]
- Ko, K., "Understanding the Republic of Korea – Socio-Economic and Administrative System" (2022), Moonwoosa
- Kwon, H., "Prospects of the Role of Government and the Structure of Governance in the Post-COVID19 Era: Focusing on the Notion of Public Value", Journal of Governance Studies, 15(4), pp.1~35 (2020)
- Lee, D., "Searching for an Alternative Paradigm for Korean Public Administration after the NPM Movement", Journal of Policy Studies, 19(1), pp.7~29 (2004)
- Lee, H. -U., "Characteristics of Korean Bureaucracy", Social Sciences, 14(1), pp.185~202 (2007)
- Analyzing government innovation best practices and the way forward, "Lee, J.", KIPA, ~ (2019)
- Park, B.-R., "Korean politics and administration History and Confucianism– Formation of Confucian bureaucracy and bureaucrats" (2017), Taehaksa
- Park, C. -O., "Control Over the Korean Bureaucracy : A Review of the NPM Civil Service Reforms Under the Roh-Moo-Hyun Government", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(2), pp.189~210 (2010)[DOI]
- Presidential Committee on Government Innovation & Decentralization, "Administrative Reforms in the Participatory Government", ~ (2008)
- Song, J. -B., "An Article on the Defense for Bureaucracy : Discussion of the Theoretical Concept on the Red tape and Green tape", Journal of Korean Decentralization Administration, 26(3), pp.1~22 (2012)
- Timsit, G., "Administrations et Etats: étude compare" (1987), Presses universitaires de France Paris
- Williams, D. R., "COVID-19 and health equity-a new kind of “herd immunity.”", JAMA, 323, pp.2478~2480 (2020)[DOI]
- Won, C. A., "Placement of Officials to the Bureau of Chronicler and their Promotion in the Joseon Dynasty", The Choson Dynasty History Association, 57, pp.207~241 (2011)
- Woodside, A., "Lost Modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea, and the Hazards of World History" (2006), Harvard University Press
- Yang, J., "Developmentalism after Development : The Growth, Crisis, and Future of the Korean Develomental State", The Korean Public Administration Review, 39(1), pp.1~18 (2005)