Building Resilience, Agility, and Trust: The Neo-Weberian State as a Referential Model for Brazilian Public Administration
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper explores the challenges and potential solutions for enhancing Brazilian public administration through the lens of the Neo-Weberian State (NWS) model. It discusses the historical context of Brazil’s public administration, highlighting the coexistence of different administrative mechanisms and the need for a stable, resilient, and agile bureaucracy to address contemporary societal challenges effectively. The article advocates for a paradigmatic shift toward a more coordinated, inclusive, and socially driven public sector, emphasizing the importance of hierarchical mechanisms and public service ethos in safeguarding democracy. By analyzing the trajectory of public administration reforms in Brazil and comparing them to global challenges, the essay underscores the NWS’s potential to bring legitimacy and effectiveness to state actions, ultimately aiming to restore trust in public administration and strengthen democratic governance in Brazil.
Abstract
The paper explores the challenges and potential solutions for enhancing Brazilian public administration through the lens of the Neo-Weberian State (NWS) model. It discusses the historical context of Brazil’s public administration, highlighting the coexistence of different administrative mechanisms and the need for a stable, resilient, and agile bureaucracy to address contemporary societal challenges effectively. The article advocates for a paradigmatic shift toward a more coordinated, inclusive, and socially driven public sector, emphasizing the importance of hierarchical mechanisms and public service ethos in safeguarding democracy. By analyzing the trajectory of public administration reforms in Brazil and comparing them to global challenges, the essay underscores the NWS’s potential to bring legitimacy and effectiveness to state actions, ultimately aiming to restore trust in public administration and strengthen democratic governance in Brazil.
참고문헌 (32)
- Abramovay, P., "A Democracia Equilibrista: Políticos e Burocratas no Brasil (1a)" (2022), Companhia das Letras
- Abrucio, F. L., "American Federal Systems and COVID-19", pp.63~88 (2021), Emerald Publishing Limited
- Ansell, C., "Public administration and politics meet turbulence : The search for robust governance responses", Public Administration, 101(1), pp.3~22 (2023)[DOI]
- Arretche, M, "Trinta anos da Constituição de 1988: razões para comemorar?", Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 37, pp.395~414 (2018)
- Beetham, D, "Bureaucracy" (1996), Open University Press
- Bersch, K., "Political Control and Bureaucratic Resistance: The Case of Environmental Agencies in Brazil", Latin American Politics and Society, pp.1~24 (2023)
- Bouckaert, G., "The neo-Weberian state : From ideal type model to reality", Max Weber Studies, 23(1), pp.13~59 (2023)[DOI]
- Cha, S., "Hierarchy-oriented bureaucracy of South Korea : A type of Neo-Weberian State", Journal of Policy Studies, 39(2), pp.121~147 (2024)[DOI]
- "Trust, state capacity, and the epidemiological mystery of COVID-19" (2022)[URL]
- Du Gay, P., "For public service: State, office, and ethics" (2023), Routledge
- Gomide, A. A., "Democracy and bureaucracy in newly industrialized countries : A systematic comparison between Latin America and East Asia", Governance, 35(1), pp.83~102 (2022)[DOI]
- Desmonte e reconfiguração de políticas públicas (2016-2022), "Gomide, A. A.", IPEA; INCT, 2023
- Im, T., "Revisiting bureaucratic dysfunction : The role of bureaucracy in democratization", Journal of Policy Studies, 32(1), pp.127~147 (2017)
- Kattel, R., "How to Make an Entrepreneurial State: Why Innovation Needs Bureaucracy" (2022), Yale University Press
- Kattel, R., "Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector", Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), pp.787~801 (2018)[DOI]
- Koga, N., "When bargaining is and is not possible : The politics of bureaucratic expertise in the context of democratic backsliding", Policy and Society, 42(3), pp.378~391 (2023)[DOI]
- Koupak, K., "Democracia e participação em xeque no governo Bolsonaro", Caderno Eletrônico de Ciências Sociais, 9(1), pp.45~67 (2021)[DOI]
- Lotta, G. S., "Bureaucratic responses to democratic backsliding: an analysis of the agency of federal civil servants during the Bolsonaro government", Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, pp.e266094~ (2023)[DOI]
- Lowy Institute, "COVID Performance Index: Deconstructing Pandemic Responses" (2021), Lowy Institute
- Mazzucato, M., "Mission-oriented innovation policies : challenges and opportunities", Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), pp.803~815 (2018)[DOI]
- Mazzucato, M, "Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism" (2021), Harper Business
- "Innovation-driven inclusive and sustainable growth: challenges and opportunities for Brazil UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Policy Report 2023/06" (2023)[URL]
- Milhorance, C., "Policy dismantling and democratic regression in Brazil under Bolsonaro : Coalition politics, ideas, and underlying discourses", Review of Policy Research, 39, pp.752~770 (2022)[DOI]
- Morais de Sá e Silva, M., "Policy dismantling by capacity manipulation in a context of democratic backsliding : The bureaucracy in disarray in Bolsonaro’s Brazil", Review of Public Policy, 272 (2022)
- OECD, "Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions in Brazil: Building Trust in Public Institutions" (2023), OECD Publishing
- Panizza, F., "A Reform without Losers: The Symbolic Economy of Civil Service Reform in Uruguay, 1995–96", Latin American Politics and Society, 46(3), pp.1~28 (2004)[DOI]
- Peci, A., "Populism and bureaucratic frictions : lessons from Bolsonarism", Journal of Policy Studies, 36(4), pp.27~35 (2021)
- Peters, B. G., "What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program", Policy and Society, 36(3), pp.385~396 (2017)[DOI]
- Peters, B. G., "Politicization of the public service during democratic backsliding : Alternative perspectives", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(4), pp.629~639 (2022)[DOI]
- Ramos, C., "The neo-Weberian state and the neodevelopmentalist strategies in Latin America : the case of Uruguay", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(2), pp.261~277 (2020)[DOI]
- "Public agency resilience in times of democratic backsliding: Structure, collaboration, and professional standards" (2023)[URL]
- Story, J., "(Mis)Led by an Outsider : Abusive Supervision, Disengagement, and Silence in Politicized Bureaucracies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2023)[DOI]
