1950~60년대 김우종 비평의 속성과 그 궤적 변모 양상

Abstract

This paper reviewed the features and changes of criticism of Kim Woo-jong in the 1950s and 1960s. This paper stems from the problem consciousness that not enough attention was given to Kim. In order to understand Kim in detail, this paper examined the path of Kim’s activities, and then proceeded to review Kim’s criticism. In general, Kim is classified as a post-war critic. However, he is different from other post-war critics. Kim moved according to his interests. At first, he showed interest in analytical criticism. Next, he focused on reinterpreting classical literature. In addition, he expressed his view of criticism. Furthermore, he advocated participative literature. As such, he performed a variety of literary activities. Kim was an ‘outsider critic’ who does not belong to any sect in the literary circles. Meanwhile, Kim revealed his thoughts on criticism, his thoughts on tradition, and his thoughts on participative literature. Kim regarded criticism as a means of self-renewal, a unique perception. Also, Kim was very interested in the issue of tradition. As a result, his position has changed from a negative view of tradition to a positive view of tradition. Finally, Kim advocated participative literature from the previous period and demanded a renewal of existing literature. Therefore, he was a pioneer in this field.