수단선택의 이질성을 고려한 잠재계층모형(Latent Class Model) 구축: 서울시 통근자를 사례로
Developing a Latent Class Model Considering Heterogeneity in Mode Choice Behavior : A Case of Commuters in Seoul
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
교통계획에서 사람들의 수단선택 의사 결정과정을 이해하고 이를 토대로 수요예측의 정확성을 높이는 것은 매우 중요하다. 이를 위해 여러 계층마다 수단선택 영향요인들이 다르게 나타나는 이질성(taste heterogeneity)을 반영한 모형들이 개발되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 목적지의토지이용 특성에 따라 수단선택에 미치는 요인의 영향력이 다를 것이라는 가설을 세우고 2010 년 서울시 가구통행실태조사 자료를 활용하여 서울시내 출근통행에 대한 잠재계층모형을 분석하였다. 먼저 목적지의 토지이용 특성을 활용하여 수단선택에 대한 잠재계층을 구분하고, 각각의 잠재계층에 대한 수단선택 모형을 개발하였다. 잠재계층모형 추정결과, 서울시내 출근통행 수단선택의 경우 두 개의 잠재계층으로 분석되었다. 첫 번째 계층은 승용차와 대중교통의수단분담이 비슷하고, 목적지가 상대적으로 도심이 아닌 주거시설이 많은 지역들이고, 두 번째계층은 주로 대중교통의 분담률이 높고 목적지가 상대적으로 도심에 속하는 업무/상업시설이많은 지역이다. 또한 이들 계층간의 수단선택 모형의 경우, 인구 및 사회경제지표들의 수단선택에 미치는 영향이 계층간에 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었다.
Abstract
It is crucial to understand how people make decisions on mode choice and to accurately predict their behaviors in transportation planning. One of avenues for advancing modeling is, in particular, taking into account for taste heterogeneity in modeling that can incorporate different decision-making processes across group. In this study, we hypothesize that how people make decisions on mode choice would differ by destination in that land use characteristics are heterogeneous by zone even if zones are all in the same area. To this end, we apply Latent Class Modeling (LCM) to commute trips in Seoul by using 2010 household travel diary survey, investigate types of latent classes with the aid of characteristics of destination, and analyze how those classes differently response to factors. The LCM identifies two classes: in the first one, modal split of auto and public transit (bus and metro) is almost half-and-half and the trip destinations are characterized by relatively more residence facilities and less business/commercial facilities; in the second one, public transit has a notably high share and trip destinations are characterized by relatively more business/commercial facilities. In addition, it turns out that demographic and socio-economic variables affect mode choice differently by class.
참고문헌 (28)
- Anowar S, "Analyzing car ownership in Quebec City : a comparison of traditional and latent class ordered and unordered models", Transportation, 41(5), pp.1013~1039 (2014)
- 배윤경, "잠재계층분석에 따른 수단선택모형비교분석", 대한교통학회지, 28(3), pp.99~107 (2010), 대한교통학회
- 배윤경, "환경특성을 반영한 잠재계층수단선택모형 개발", 지역연구, 27(2), pp.99~111 (2011), 한국지역학회
- Ben-Akiva M, "Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand" (1985), The MIT Press
- Ben-Akiva M, "Hybrid choice models : Progress and challenges", Marketing Letters, 13(3), pp.163~175 (2002)
- Bhat C. R., "An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel", Transportation Science, 31(1), pp.34~48 (1997)
- Carrasco J. A, "Review and assessment of the nested logit model", Transport Reviews, 22(2), pp.197~218 (2002)
- Cervero R, "Travel demand and the 3Ds : density, diversity, and design", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 2(3), pp.199~219 (1997)
- Choo S, "What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 38(3), pp.201~222 (2004)
- Ewing R, "Travel and the built environment : A meta-analysis", Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), pp.265~294 (2010)
- Greene W. H, "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis : Contrasts with mixed logit", Transportation Research Part B : Methodological, 37(8), pp.681~698 (2003)
- Handy S, "Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 10(6), pp.427~444 (2005)
- Hensher D. A, "The mixed logit model : the state of practice", Transportation, 30(2), pp.133~176 (2003)
- Johansson M. V, "The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 40(6), pp.507~525 (2006)
- Kim S. H, "Taste heterogeneity as an alternative form of endogeneity bias : Investigating the attitude-moderated effects of built environment and socio-demographics on vehicle ownership using latent class modeling", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 116, pp.130~150 (2018)
- 김수재, "가구통행실태조사 자료를 활용한 서울시 연계수단 통행행태의 영향요인 분석 연구", 한국ITS학회 논문지, 17(1), pp.55~70 (2018), 한국ITS학회[DOI]
- Lanzini P, "Shedding light on the psychological and behavioral determinants of travel mode choice : A meta-analysis", Transportation Research Part F : Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 48, pp.13~27 (2017)
- Popovich N. D, "Downtown, strip centers, and big-box stores : Mode choice by shopping destination type in Davis, California", Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(2), pp.149~170 (2015)
- The influence of built-form and land use on mode choice: Evidence from the 1996 Bay Area Travel Survey, "Reilly M", Institute of Urban and Regional Development at UC Berkeley, ~ (2003)
- Sun B, "Built environmental impacts on commuting mode choice and distance : Evidence from Shanghai", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 52, pp.441~453 (2017)
- "2010 Interregional Passenger OD Travel Survey" (2011)[URL]
- "2011 National Transport Demand Survey and Database Construction Project" (2012)[URL]
- Train K. E, "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Vij A, "Preference endogeneity in discrete choice models", Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 64, pp.90~105 (2014)
- Vij A, "How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful", Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 90, pp.192~217 (2016)
- Vij A, "Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior", Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 54, pp.164~178 (2013)
- Walker J. L, "Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions", Journal of Geographical Systems, 9(1), pp.77~101 (2007)
- Zhang M, "The role of land use in travel mode choice : Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong", Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), pp.344~360 (2004)