지역별 대중교통 환승혜택 형평성 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 경기도를 중심으로
User Benefit Analysis By Transfer Fare Policy : Focuses on the case of Gyeonggi-do
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
경기도는 도시형, 도농복합형, 농촌형으로 도시형태가 구분되어, 대중교통 서비스 제공도도시 형태에 따라 다르지만, 대중교통 환승요금제는 단순한 형태의 수평적 형평성을 기준으로동일한 환승유효시간을 적용하여 운영되고 있다. 이로 인해 대중교통 서비스 공급형태가 열악한 비도심 지역은 버스의 운행간격이 30분 이상으로 환승할인혜택을 받지 못하는 경우가 발생한다. 기회의 형평성 측면에서 기본적으로 불리하게 적용되어 요금할인 혜택을 받지 못하는것이다. 이에 본 연구는 경기도의 환승요금제의 비형평적 사례를 교통카드를 활용하여 환승비혜택 현황을 분석하고, 환승비혜택율 지표를 개발하고, 지표를 활용하여 시나리오 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 대중교통 서비스 공급 확대가 아닌 수직적 형평성 기준의 제도 개선을 통해환승혜택의 기회의 균등이 가능하다는 것을 증명하였다. 수직적 형평성 기준을 적용하여 지역별 맞춤형 제도를 운영하는 환승요금제도의 정책 대안을 제시하였다.
Abstract
Gyeonggi-do comprises several types of areas, including urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. The availability of public transportation services varies depending on the area types, but the fare structure is based on a simple transfer rule, i.e., a transfer is free when completed within 30 minutes. As a result, users in non-urban areas with a poor frequency of public transportation services do not receive transfer discounts because most of the bus routes in these areas have a gap of more than 30 minutes between services. In terms of equality of opportunity, the transfer rule is being applied unfavorably and, as a result, equality of opportunity of the non-urban commuter is severely affected. Therefore, this study analyzed the user benefits mainly stemming from transfer fares using the smart card data of commuters using public transportation in Gyeonggi-do. An index called the beneficiary rate of the free transfer was developed and a scenario analysis was conducted based on the various levels of the rate. The results of this analysis proved that the users of public transportation services in non-urban areas in Gyeonggi-do can only receive transfer benefits by the extended time for free transfer and not by the implementation of a uniform policy irrespective of the type of area. The study also suggested an equitable fare transfer system and policy alternatives.
참고문헌 (16)
- Toward a Policy Framework for Toronto Transit Fare Equity, "Campbell, D. A.", ~ (2014)
- Efficiency And Equity Implications Of Alternative Transit Fare Policies, "Cervero, R.", Urban Mass Transportation Administration, ~ (1980)
- Chun, B. H., "Aristotle on Nicomacos Ethics" (2018), East-West Cultural History
- Curie, G., "Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs", Journal of Transport Geography, 18, pp.31~41 (2010)
- Han, C., "Evaluating the Spatial Deprivation of Public Transportation Resources in Areas of Rapid Urbanization : Accessibility and Social Equity", Hindawi Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019, pp.2019~2011 (2019)
- Hodge, D., "Fiscal Equity in Urban Mass Transit Systems", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 288~306 (2010)
- Kim, E. Y., "A study on the Improvement of Public Transportation Transfer Fare System through the Development of Equity Indicators", Doctor, pp.2021
- Lee, C. S., "Social Welfare Dictionary" (2009), Bulefish
- 이원도, "수도권 가구통행 조사를 바탕으로 한 교통 형평성 분석", 한국도시지리학회지, 15(1), pp.75~86 (2012), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
- Ministry of Land & Transport, "Korea Road Capacity Handbook", pp.595~ (2013)
- Nusorsoo, C. K., "Deep discount Group Pass Programs as Instrument for Increasing Transit Revenue and Ridership", pp.2004
- Phillip, R., "A comparative analysis of the challenges in measuring transit equity: Definitions, interpretations, and limitations", Journal of Transport Geography, 72, pp.64~75 (2018)
- Transit Cooperative Research Program, "The Federal Transit Administration", 21~, pp.TCRP Report 94 (2003)
- Yang, S. G., "Application and Alternative Evaluation of the Urban Bus Route System Evaluation Technique Considering Accessibility and Equity", Land Planning, 47(2), pp.133~143 (2016)
- Yang, S. I., "Social Welfare Policy Theory, Yang Seowon", pp.11~ (2015), Yang Seowon
- Yoon, J. J., "An empirical study on the spatial definition of public transportation accessibility in Seoul", Land Planning, 50(4), pp.69~85 (2015)