본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

南朝 文論에 나타난 比興 수사법의 演變 考

A study on the origin of Bi Xing` theory(比興論) in the Nan Chao(南朝) Dynasty`s literary theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper aims at investigating rhetorical origins and traditions of ancient China, which will be divided into three historical periods. Ancient rhetoric of ancient China was born in Chun Qiu(春秋:722 B.C.~481 B.C.)·Zhan Guo(戰國: 403 B.C.~221 B.C.) Dynasty. Confucius(孔子), Lao-tzu (老子), Hanfeizi (韓非子) and the various schools of thought(諸子百家) made the most of rhetorical method to prove their ideas convincing and persuasive. But during Han(漢) Dynasty rhetoric--in the second period of ancient China--was in decline. Han Dynasty proscribed all non-Confucian schools of thought(罷黜百家) and espoused only Confucianism as the orthodox state ideology(獨尊儒術). Therefore, literary activities were stagnant. Nan Chao Dynasties(南朝), the third period of ancient China, was a kind of the Renaissance period. The art and literature were prosperous. Especially Liu Xie(劉勰)`s The literary mind and the craving of dragons and Zhong Rong(鍾嶸)`s Shi Pin (詩品) made many meaningful arguments about Bi Xing` theory(比興論). They were in substantial agreement with each other. But there were two differences between them. Liu Xie took a serious view of the function for social enlightenment of Bi Xing` theory, and Zhong Rong scaled up functions in pure art and literature. Liu Xie considered the beginning in its functions of Bi Xing` theory, and Zhong Rong approved the end functions of Bi Xing` theory. Their Bi Xing` theories were of great worth in art and literature of the ancient China.

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating rhetorical origins and traditions of ancient China, which will be divided into three historical periods. Ancient rhetoric of ancient China was born in Chun Qiu(春秋:722 B.C.~481 B.C.)·Zhan Guo(戰國: 403 B.C.~221 B.C.) Dynasty. Confucius(孔子), Lao-tzu (老子), Hanfeizi (韓非子) and the various schools of thought(諸子百家) made the most of rhetorical method to prove their ideas convincing and persuasive. But during Han(漢) Dynasty rhetoric--in the second period of ancient China--was in decline. Han Dynasty proscribed all non-Confucian schools of thought(罷黜百家) and espoused only Confucianism as the orthodox state ideology(獨尊儒術). Therefore, literary activities were stagnant. Nan Chao Dynasties(南朝), the third period of ancient China, was a kind of the Renaissance period. The art and literature were prosperous. Especially Liu Xie(劉勰)`s The literary mind and the craving of dragons and Zhong Rong(鍾嶸)`s Shi Pin (詩品) made many meaningful arguments about Bi Xing` theory(比興論). They were in substantial agreement with each other. But there were two differences between them. Liu Xie took a serious view of the function for social enlightenment of Bi Xing` theory, and Zhong Rong scaled up functions in pure art and literature. Liu Xie considered the beginning in its functions of Bi Xing` theory, and Zhong Rong approved the end functions of Bi Xing` theory. Their Bi Xing` theories were of great worth in art and literature of the ancient China.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 이병한, "중국 고전시학의 이해" (2000), 문학과 지성사
  2. 車柱環, "中國詩論" (1989), 서울대학교출판부
  3. 高木正一, "鍾嶸詩品" (1978), 東海大學出版會
  4. 羅根澤, "中國文學批評史 上海" (1984), 上海古籍出版社
  5. 魯迅, 著, "魯迅全集 제3책" (1989), 人民文學出版社
  6. 光社 著, "文心十論" (1986), 春風文藝出版社
  7. 王弼 注, "諸子集成-老子注 제3책" (1986), 中華書局
  8. 禹克坤, "中國詩歌的審美境界" (1992), 中國廣播電視出版社
  9. 劉? 著, "文心雕龍義證 上海" (1989), 上海古籍出版社
  10. 趙沛霖, "興的源起" (1987), 中國社會科學出版社
  11. 朱熹 撰, "論語集注" (1983), 中華書局
  12. 淸 阮元 校刻, "十三經注疏-周易" (1980), 中華書局
  13. 許愼 撰, "說文解字注", 黎明文化事業股?有限公司
  14. 黃侃 著, "文心雕龍札記" (1973), 文史哲出版社
  15. 王季思 著, "玉輸軒古典文學論集, 說比興" (1982), 中華書局
  16. 田兆元 著, "古代文學理論硏究 17집 論比興的多向演進" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  17. 胡念貽 著, "中國古典文學論稿, 詩經中的賦比興" (1987), 上海古籍出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)