의사소통 교육에서 코칭의 수사학 - <리더십과 의사소통> 교과 운영사례를 중심으로
Coaching Rhetoric in Communication Education - With Operating Cases of “Leadership and Communication Course” -
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Now, the concept of “coaching” has expanded to not only in sports and business sector but in various fields of society. The philosophy, concept, and technique of coaching have been properly developed and applied to relevant areas of every field of society too. Basically the effect of education can be internalized through the mutual communication process between a teacher and a student or students by themselves. The 21st century education is alleged to bring up not a knowledge-giver but a knowledge-producer for problem-solving. It is important for them to build up attitudes like recognizing, studying, and examining problems. In that respect, this paper considers the role of teacher as a coach. Rather than giving a detailed answer through coaching techniques, a teacher needs to motivate students to find solutions out by themselves. In other words, like a coach, the teacher should not deliver his or her own knowledge, philosophy, and experiences to students one-sidedly but trust their potential, respect individual value, and create atmosphere and circumstances which enables students to solve problems by them. Coaching has more important meaning particularly in the communication education, because it could cultivate students’ thinking and expressivity. The communication education generally has smaller classes than other courses and its teaching subjects focus techniques which are required to communicate and persuade others; its educational method must be distinguished from other general courses to build up students’ practical capability.. In this sense, the teacher’s coaching role that guide and serve students would be crucial above all things. Thus, a research on coaching techniques and its rhetorical aspects which contributed to enhance students’ participation and communication in the liberal arts curriculum “leadership and communication” has conducted by this paper as a method of inductive case studies. In conclusion, the teacher’s coaching capacity is significant for encouraging students’ learning motive and getting favorable understandings and communication in the educational arena. The quintessential factors of coaching are simple, but to lead out a practical coaching, I found the fact that confidence to a teacher and a detailed communication process to draw students’ thinking are must be continuously conducted. It must be carried out step by step to improve students’ capability. It also has to be opportunity of development for them by voluntary participation and through the process of forming and delivering their ideas. Through the result of course evaluation, I found that coaching techniques like questioning, listening, feedback, and motivating play an important role in internalizing the subject of study to students Our future education should be stretched to this way; students cultivate their own thinking and promote their in-depth understandings and empathy to the world and others. To achieve this, communication education must be continued with a learner-centered teaching method on the premise of interactive communication. Beyond the mere role of information and knowledge giver, the teacher has to change its role to a learning facilitator and/or coach, so coaching rhetoric is very important in giving students learning motives.. With the subject “coaching”, this paper examines an important aspect of teacher’s role in active learning, which enables students to upgrade their own ability: think together with them about how to catch fish, rather than just give them caught fish.
Abstract
Now, the concept of “coaching” has expanded to not only in sports and business sector but in various fields of society. The philosophy, concept, and technique of coaching have been properly developed and applied to relevant areas of every field of society too. Basically the effect of education can be internalized through the mutual communication process between a teacher and a student or students by themselves. The 21st century education is alleged to bring up not a knowledge-giver but a knowledge-producer for problem-solving. It is important for them to build up attitudes like recognizing, studying, and examining problems. In that respect, this paper considers the role of teacher as a coach. Rather than giving a detailed answer through coaching techniques, a teacher needs to motivate students to find solutions out by themselves. In other words, like a coach, the teacher should not deliver his or her own knowledge, philosophy, and experiences to students one-sidedly but trust their potential, respect individual value, and create atmosphere and circumstances which enables students to solve problems by them. Coaching has more important meaning particularly in the communication education, because it could cultivate students’ thinking and expressivity. The communication education generally has smaller classes than other courses and its teaching subjects focus techniques which are required to communicate and persuade others; its educational method must be distinguished from other general courses to build up students’ practical capability.. In this sense, the teacher’s coaching role that guide and serve students would be crucial above all things. Thus, a research on coaching techniques and its rhetorical aspects which contributed to enhance students’ participation and communication in the liberal arts curriculum “leadership and communication” has conducted by this paper as a method of inductive case studies. In conclusion, the teacher’s coaching capacity is significant for encouraging students’ learning motive and getting favorable understandings and communication in the educational arena. The quintessential factors of coaching are simple, but to lead out a practical coaching, I found the fact that confidence to a teacher and a detailed communication process to draw students’ thinking are must be continuously conducted. It must be carried out step by step to improve students’ capability. It also has to be opportunity of development for them by voluntary participation and through the process of forming and delivering their ideas. Through the result of course evaluation, I found that coaching techniques like questioning, listening, feedback, and motivating play an important role in internalizing the subject of study to students Our future education should be stretched to this way; students cultivate their own thinking and promote their in-depth understandings and empathy to the world and others. To achieve this, communication education must be continued with a learner-centered teaching method on the premise of interactive communication. Beyond the mere role of information and knowledge giver, the teacher has to change its role to a learning facilitator and/or coach, so coaching rhetoric is very important in giving students learning motives.. With the subject “coaching”, this paper examines an important aspect of teacher’s role in active learning, which enables students to upgrade their own ability: think together with them about how to catch fish, rather than just give them caught fish.
참고문헌 (45)
- 가네코 모토히사(Kaneko Motohisa), "대학의 교육력 - 무엇을 가르치고 배울 것인가" (2008), 북 코리아
- 김광웅, "우리는 미래에 무엇을 공부할 것인가 - 창조사회의 학문과 대학" (2009), 생각의 나무
- 김인수, "해결중심 단기코칭" (2011), 시그마 프레스
- 니콜라스 니그로(Nicholas Nigro), "팀장 멘토링 & 코칭" (2010), 위즈덤 하우스
- 다니엘 골먼(Daniel Goleman), "SQ사회지능" (2006), 웅진지식하우스
- 다니엘 골먼(Daniel Goleman), "감성의 리더십" (2004), 청림출판
- 도로시 리즈(Dorothy Leeds), "질문의 7가지 힘" (2005), 더난 출판
- 라렌 세길(Larraine Segil), "파트너링" (2007), 비즈니스맵
- 로버트 치알디니(Robert B. Cialdini), "설득의 기술 - 공감을 이끌어내는 소통의 원칙과 단계" (2009), 21세기북스
- 마샤 벤치(Marcia Bench), "커리어 코칭" (2007), 교보문고
- 마샬 쿡(Marshall Cook), "코칭의 기술" (2003), 지식공작소
- 마이클 J. 마쿼트(Michael J. Marquardt), "질문 리더십" (2006), 흐름출판
- 마이클 해크먼(Michael Z. Hackman), "소통의 리더십" (2010), 에피스테메
- 말린 캐로셀리(Mariene Caroselli), "리더십의 기술" (2004), 지식공작소
- 박성철, "Sermo Corporis - 신체언어와 준언어의 수사학", 수사학, (6), pp.69~97 (2007), 한국수사학회
- 박정근, "응용코칭론" (2004), 21세기교육사
- 송영수, "인아웃코칭 - 사람과 조직을 키우는 리더의 소통기술" (2011), 크레듀
- 스가와라 유코(管原裕子), "코칭과 퍼실리테이션을 통한 최고의 동기부여" (2009), 새로운 제안
- 스티브 챈들러(Steve Chandler), "인생 코칭" (2006), 국일미디어
- 아모스 해치(J. Amos Hatch), "교육상황에서 질적 연구 수행하기" (2008), 학지사
- 에노모토 히데타케(Ennomoto Hidetaka), "마법의 코칭 - 존경받는 리더의 5가지 코칭 기술" (2005), 새로운 제안
- 엘리자베트 하버라이트너(Elisabeth Haberleither), "코칭 리더십" (2005), 국일증권경제연구소
- 오인경, "구성주의 교수학습전략으로서의 코칭의 역할 및 프로세스 - 외국 기업사례비교", 기업교육연구, 5(2) (2003)
- 우찌야마 다츠미(內山辰美), "질문의 기술" (2004), 이가서
- 유동수, "한국형 코칭" (2008), 학지사
- 윌버트 맥키치(Wilbert J. McKeachie), "어떻게 가르칠 것인가? - 대학교수들을 위한 지침서" (2002), 한국문화사
- 이광주, "대학의 역사" (2008), 살림
- 이토 아키라(伊東明), "코칭 대화기술" (2005), 김영사
- 재클린 브룩스(Jacqueline G. Brooks), "구성주의 교수, 학습론" (2001), 백의
- 제러미 리프킨(Jeremy Rifkin), "공감의 시대" (2010), 민음사
- 오형엽, "이성의 수사학" (2001), 고려대학교출판부
- 조셉 포크먼(Joseph R. Folkman), "피드백의 힘" (2007), 북폴리오
- 존 휘트모어(John Whitmore), "성과향상을 위한 코칭 리더십" (2007), 김영사
- 최미리, "미국과 한국 대학의 교양교육 비교" (2001), 양서원
- 크리스 아지리스(Chris Argyris), "효과적 커뮤니케이션 - 간결하고 정확한 의사소통기술" (2009), 21세기북스
- 테리 피어스(Terry Pearce), "커뮤니케이션 리더십" (2006), 예문
- 토니 스톨츠푸스(Tony Stoltzfus), "코칭 퀘스천" (2010), 동쪽나라
- 톰 G. 크레인(Thomas G. Crane), "코칭의 핵심" (2009), 메타 프레스
- 티모시 보셔스(Timothy Borchers), "수사학이론" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 퍼드낸드 퍼니스(Ferdinand F. Fournies), "리더를 위한 코칭 스킬" (2002), HR Partner 컨설팅
- 김종영, "리더의 커뮤니케이션" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 하버드 비즈니스 프레스, "코칭의 기술" (2008), 한스미디어
- 하워드 모건(Howard Morgan), "리더십코칭 50" (2006), 거름
- 헨리 로조브스키(Henry Rosovsky), "대학, 갈등과 선택" (1996), 삼성경제연구소
- 힐스(P.J. Hills), "교수, 학습, 그리고 의사소통" (1998), 교육과학사
