본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동중서 대책문의 수사법

A Rhetorical Analysis on Dong Zhongshu's Demonstration Essays

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒, B.C.E.170? ~ B.C.E.120?) has been evaluated to have a refined, indirect and academic style of demonstration writing in Han dynasty. In his most famous essay Tian Ren San Ce, He used series of chaning to explain phenomena of the society and principles of ruling the empire. The flow of ideas seemed to be very natural like river in the spring as one of the critic said. Dong Zhongshu tried to set up the theory of natural disaster[災異論], and the stages in detail were arranged in the system. He suggested many definitions of the concepts of Confucianism in order to persuade the emperor to take them into consideration on his policies. Through these rhetorical methods, his essay seemed academic and logical. He showed a lot of superfluousness in his essays, too. It was because he did not only answer to the emperor’s question, but he also tried to express his own ideas of controlling the world in the same essay. He used too many figures of speech, and it made his essays more complicated.

Abstract

Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒, B.C.E.170? ~ B.C.E.120?) has been evaluated to have a refined, indirect and academic style of demonstration writing in Han dynasty. In his most famous essay Tian Ren San Ce, He used series of chaning to explain phenomena of the society and principles of ruling the empire. The flow of ideas seemed to be very natural like river in the spring as one of the critic said. Dong Zhongshu tried to set up the theory of natural disaster[災異論], and the stages in detail were arranged in the system. He suggested many definitions of the concepts of Confucianism in order to persuade the emperor to take them into consideration on his policies. Through these rhetorical methods, his essay seemed academic and logical. He showed a lot of superfluousness in his essays, too. It was because he did not only answer to the emperor’s question, but he also tried to express his own ideas of controlling the world in the same essay. He used too many figures of speech, and it made his essays more complicated.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 김나리, "한 제국의 형성과 동중서의 역할", 석사, pp.2008
  2. 염정삼, "今古文 經學에 관한 小考 ― 글쓰기와 제도의 상관성", 중국문학, 50(50), pp.1~20 (2007), 한국중국어문학회
  3. 이연승, "동중서의 천인상관설에 관하여", 종교문화연구, 2 (2000)
  4. 심규호, "이중톈 제국을 말하다" (2008), 에버리치홀딩스
  5. 홍대표, "한서열전" (1997), 범우사
  6. 郭預衡, "中國散文史, 上冊" (1986), 上海古籍出版社
  7. 王永祥, "董仲舒評傳" (1995), 南京大學出版社
  8. 張擧英, "董仲舒 "天人三策" 硏究" (2008), 山東大學碩士學位論文
  9. 張國華, "從"天人三策"到"春秋繁露"", 中國社會科學院硏究生院學報, (3) (1995)
  10. 漆緖邦, "中國散文通史, 上卷" (1992), 吉林敎育出版社
  11. 福井重雅, "漢代儒敎の史的硏究" (2005), 汲古書院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)