본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

修辞学在東方的盛衰変遷 - 兼中日修辞学比较 -

The Rise and Fall of Rhetoric in the Orient: Comparison of Rhetoric between Japan and China

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

今天,全球化的发展似乎已成必然。在新媒介的推动下,东西双方文化传统都在被迫变异转换。面对这一发展变化,考虑东西方文化的冲撞与融合,在此笔者从比较文学、比较修辞学的角度提出两个问题,愿与大家共同探讨和思考。第一,当我们接受认同东方“个体修辞”概念,并在建构“公共修辞”上达成普遍共识时,我们是否已淡化或忽略了爱德华.萨伊德在《东方主义》里所提出的著名的命题?即西学东渐已成事实,全球化、价值取向均一化逐渐形成时,东方是否已经有了心理准备,可以扬弃民族、本土和地区固有的传统价值?抑或已经能够克服狭隘的国家爱、东方朴素的自我爱?萨伊德在《东方主义》所提出的命题和忠告,是否已无益于边缘、地区和本土的“个体修辞”的发展?或已无益于抵制“公共修辞”的普及?第二,如果我们认同“公共修辞”具有普世价值,那么如何对待、解释和参与探索修辞学诞生时被提出来的古老的命题?即苏格拉底与裴德罗对话中提出的命题:修辞学应如何探索真理、智慧,或真理、智慧的探索应如何应用和对待修辞学,抑或爱智、灵感、神性或神灵与修辞学的关系。因为修辞学在古希腊从诞生那一瞬间就没满足于修辞学只囿于匍匐大地的器术、道具、形式和应用学科,就象苏格拉底所阐释的那样(柏拉图《裴德罗237A-253C》),他雄辩地揭示修辞学的顶级样式应该是爱智、灵性和神性的产物——然而,同时,事实上,西方修辞学从它的诞生起从未轻视过修辞学在基础教育的重要性与日常生活中的作用和意义。因为只有修辞学与思辨、灵性和爱智融为一体时,它才可以独自构成一门学科,否则它只能是隶属或寄生于其它学科。用当今话语来讲,修辞学接近或走向社会学、市场营销学,它是否仍可以进一步探讨智慧、真理和灵性?

Abstract

Though once a fundamental part of education in the Humanities, Rhetoric declined in the Western world in the 19th century. Western Rhetoric was adopted by Japan in the late 19th century and soon reached its greatest level, but it rapidly vanished from society during the 1920s. During this time, the Chinese adopted Rhetoric from Japan and Britani-America, and by the 1930s it had evolved into a uniquely Chinese style. With the exception of two periods of great internal upheaval, Chinese Rhetoric appears to have succeeded in higher education, as well as in the modern Chinese language more generally. Rhetoric has helped the Chinese language to progress, modernize and become standardized. In this paper, I will re-examine and discuss this phenomenon and argue that, in general, ancient Greek Rhetoric had standardized European languages in the Middle Ages and after the Renaissance. However, how has this powerful tool disappeared in today’s Japanese language? Roughly 2,400 years after its inception in ancient Greece, and then transmitted through Japan, Rhetoric has become an important tool in many Chinese universities and in efforts at expanding the influence of modern Chinese. The entire process forces us to consider when and in what situations people need the skills offered by Rhetoric, suggesting that this phenomenon is a kind of Orientalism. Now, however, we must ask whether it is starting to go beyond Orientalism.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 島村瀧太郎, "新美辭學" (1902), 東京專門學校出版部
  2. 高田早苗, "美辭學" (1889), 金港堂
  3. 坪內逍遙, "早稻田文學" (1893), 早稻田大學
  4. 武島又二郎, "修辭學" (1898), 博文館
  5. 五十嵐力, "新文章講話" (1909), 早稻田大學出版會
  6. 原子郎, "修辭學歴史研究" (1994), 早稻田大學出版部
  7. 森岡健, "文章构成法" (1963), 至文堂
  8. 速水博司, "近代日本修辭學史" (1988), 有朋堂
  9. 鄭子瑜, "中國修辭學史稿" (1984), 上海敎育出版社
  10. 吳亂權, "中國現代修辭學通論" (1998), 台湾商務印書館
  11. 宋振華, "現代漢語修辭學" (1984), 吉林人民出版社
  12. 鄭子瑜, "中國修辭學史稿" (1984), 上海敎育出版社
  13. 石川願浩, "中國共産党成立史" (2001), 岩波書店
  14. 世界漢語修辭雜), "國際修辭學硏究(第二輯", pp.2012, 陳汝東
  15. Chamberlain, Basil Hall, "A Simplified Grammar of the Japanese Language (Modern Written Style)" (1886), Trubner
  16. Chamberlain, Basil Hall, "A Handbook of Colloquial Japanese" (1888), Trubner
  17. Clark, John Scott, "A Practical Rhetoric: for Instruction in English Composition in Colleges and Intermediate Schools" (1886)
  18. Genung, John Franklin, "The Working Principles of Rhetoric: Examined in Their Literary Relations and Illustrated with Examples" (1890)
  19. Na Min Gu EIC, "The Third Biennial Conference of the Rhetoric Society of the World & International Conference on Rhetorics", ~
  20. Nesfield, John Collinson, "Senior Course of English Composition" (1898)
  21. W., "Chambers's Information for the People" (1874)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)