영작문 평가 상황에서 학생들의 평가 과정에 대한 연구
Investigating the student's score-decision in the EFL essay-writing context
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This study investigates students’ rating process in the EFL essay-writing context. The current study aims to address the answers to the following research questions: 1) which specific feature do students focus on in holistic score decision? and 2) why do students value such an analytic feature in the holistic score decision? This study uses the mixed-methodology that crosses quantitative-qualitative techniques. 90 students from group A and 108 students from group B rated sample essays in terms of 3 analytic features (organization, content, and language use) and a holistic feature using a scoring guide. After the rating task was over, 15 students were solicited to participate in semi-structured interviews. For Research Question 1, the current study, using intra-class correlation, found that the scores of organization and content were more strongly associated with the holistic score. For Research Question 2, this study suggested that a majority of interviewees concentrated on content and organization because they were aware of their lack of linguistic proficiency. In conclusion, this study proposes that students need to complete a rater training program in order for them to provide in-depth qualitative feedback and reliable scores to their peers.
참고문헌 (22)
- 신동일, "영어시험 사용자 관점에 관한 새로운 고찰:반실증주의적 패러다임 논의로부터", 18(1), pp.293~312 (2002)
- Atkinson, P, "Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and change" (2003), AltaMira Press
- Belcher,D, "Authentic interaction in a virtual classroom:Leveling the playing field in a graduate seminar", 16, pp.253~267 (1990)
- Berg,E.C, "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", 8, pp.215~241 (1999)
- Brown,J.D, "Using surveys in language programs" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Caulk,N, "Comparing teacher and student responses to written work", 28, pp.181~188 (1994)
- Connor, "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.257~276 (1994)
- Crotty,M, "The foundations of social research" (1998), Sage Publications
- De Guerrero, "Social-Cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision", pp.484~496 (1994)
- Donato, "Collective scaffolding in second language learning Vygotskian approach to second language research", pp.33~56 (1994)
- Hamp-Lyons, L, "Perspectives on validity : A historical analysis of language testing conference abstracts Validation in language assessment, Validation in language assessment", pp.253~276 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Leki,I, "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL classes", 3, pp.5~19 (1990)
- Lumley, "Implications for training", 12, pp.54~71 (1995)
- Nelson, "Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly", pp.135~142 (1993)
- Ohta,A.S, "Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse:Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development", 6, pp.93~121 (1995)
- Sakyi, A. A, "Validation of holistic scoring for ESL writing assessment, : How raters evaluate compositions, Fairness and validation in language assessment", pp.129~152 (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Song, B, "Do English and ESL faculty differ in evaluating the essays of native English-speaking and ESL students?", 5, pp.163~182 (1996)
- Sweedler-Brown,C.O, "ESL essay evaluation:The influence of sentence-level and rhetorical feature", 2, pp.3~17 (1993)
- Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Weigle,S.C, "Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions", 11, pp.197~223 (1994)
- Willard-Traub, M, "The development of large-scale portfolio placement assessment at the University of Michigan", 6, pp.41~84 (1999)
- Zhu,W, "Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction", 12, pp.492~528 (1995)