본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학 교양영어 수준별 프로그램 운영방안

Implementing a level-specific general English program at a tertiary level

0

조회

0

다운로드

43

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of the study is to develop a more effective general English program at a university level by piloting a differentiated curriculum based on the students’ English proficiency. Specifically, the study tested the efficiency of the existing model versus a three-tiered tracking model as well as the efficiency of a two-tiered versus three-tiered curriculum. Additionally, a survey was conducted to investigate the students’ perceptions about different curricular experiences. With the college division as a unit of data collection, the participants were composed of 956 freshmen who were taking either of two courses: English 1 (English Speaking and Writing) or English 2 (English Listening and Reading). The results revealed the students who received the level-specific instruction showed significant language gains and that the three-tiered program was more effective than the two-tiered system. On the other hand, the degrees of students’ satisfaction were not significantly different. Pedagogical implications and suggestions were provided towards a more efficient tracking model of general English curriculum.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop a more effective general English program at a university level by piloting a differentiated curriculum based on the students’ English proficiency. Specifically, the study tested the efficiency of the existing model versus a three-tiered tracking model as well as the efficiency of a two-tiered versus three-tiered curriculum. Additionally, a survey was conducted to investigate the students’ perceptions about different curricular experiences. With the college division as a unit of data collection, the participants were composed of 956 freshmen who were taking either of two courses: English 1 (English Speaking and Writing) or English 2 (English Listening and Reading). The results revealed the students who received the level-specific instruction showed significant language gains and that the three-tiered program was more effective than the two-tiered system. On the other hand, the degrees of students’ satisfaction were not significantly different. Pedagogical implications and suggestions were provided towards a more efficient tracking model of general English curriculum.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김달효, "능력별 집단편성에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식", 수산해양교육연구, 19(3), pp.390~402 (2007), 한국수산해양교육학회
  2. 김영숙, "대학 교양영어 수준별 수업에 대한 학습자와 교수자의 인식에 관한 연구", 영어교육, 64(4), pp.337~368 (2009), 한국영어교육학회
  3. 김현옥, "교양영어 프로그램에 관한 교수자와 학습자의 만족도 및 인식 비교", Foreign Languages Education, 14(3), pp.179~205 (2007), 한국외국어교육학회
  4. 방영주, "영어능력 인증제, 능력별 교과과정, 그리고 대학 교양영어 교육: 학생과 교사의 인식에 대한 고찰", 영어어문교육, 9(3), pp.193~211 (2004), 한국영어어문교육학회
  5. 성기완, "대학 교양영어 수준별 교육과정 모형개발연구", Foreign Languages Education, 11(2), pp.377~406 (2004), 한국외국어교육학회
  6. 송희심, "교실 외 활동을 활용한 대학 교양영어 회화프로그램의 학습자 만족도 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 15(3), pp.141~168 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  7. 조정순, "대학 교양영어 교육의 현황과 방향성 탐구", 영어교육, 57(2), pp.365~394 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  8. Barton, L., "North star-reading and writing: High-intermediate (2nd ed.)" (2003), Longman
  9. Kulik, J. A., "Ability grouping and gifted students, Handbook of gifted education", pp.178~196 (1991), Allyn & Bacon
  10. Oakes, J., "Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and sciences" (1990), Rand Corporation
  11. Richer, S., "Reference group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research", Sociology of Education, 49, pp.65~71 (1976)
  12. Saslow, J., "Top notch 2" (2006), Pearson Education
  13. Slavin, R. E., "Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis", Review of Educational Research, 57, pp.293~336 (1987)
  14. Slavin, R. E., "Ability grouping: on the wrong track", The College Board Review, 168, pp.11~18 (1993)
  15. Tomlinson, C. A., "The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners" (1999), Prentice-Hall
  16. Wegmann, B., "Mosaic 2 reading (Silver ed.)" (2007), McGraw-Hil
  17. Zemach, R., "College writing: From paragraph to essay" (2002), McMillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)