본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Peer Feedback by Undergraduate Korean Students and Native English Freshmen

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Studies on peer feedback by L2 learners generally report several benefits and positive effects of peer feedback on revision and support the use of peer feedback in writing classrooms. Despite these findings, peer feedback is found to be distrusted and scarcely utilized in writing classrooms in Korea. Students’ lack of English proficiency has been cited as one of the primary reasons behind the distrust. In order to investigate whether students’ English proficiency is a barrier in generating helpful peer feedback, this study analyzed the peer feedback produced by undergraduate Korean students studying in the U.S. and compared it to that of native English freshmen. 2,063 idea units of peer feedback produced by 12 Korean students and 20 native English students under comparable conditions were analyzed in terms of quantity, quality (helpfulness) and pragmatic features. The results show that the feedback generated by Korean students is similar to that of native English students in quantity and nearly similar in quality (helpfulness). Differences in pragmatic features of feedback are also discussed.

Abstract

Studies on peer feedback by L2 learners generally report several benefits and positive effects of peer feedback on revision and support the use of peer feedback in writing classrooms. Despite these findings, peer feedback is found to be distrusted and scarcely utilized in writing classrooms in Korea. Students’ lack of English proficiency has been cited as one of the primary reasons behind the distrust. In order to investigate whether students’ English proficiency is a barrier in generating helpful peer feedback, this study analyzed the peer feedback produced by undergraduate Korean students studying in the U.S. and compared it to that of native English freshmen. 2,063 idea units of peer feedback produced by 12 Korean students and 20 native English students under comparable conditions were analyzed in terms of quantity, quality (helpfulness) and pragmatic features. The results show that the feedback generated by Korean students is similar to that of native English students in quantity and nearly similar in quality (helpfulness). Differences in pragmatic features of feedback are also discussed.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Berg, B. C., "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
  2. Caulk, N., "Comparing teacher and student responses to written work", TESOL Quarterly, 28, pp.181~188 (1994)
  3. Cho, K., "Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline : A web-based reciprocal peer review system", Computers & Education, 48(3), pp.409~426 (2007)
  4. Cho, K., "Commenting on writing : Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts", Written Communication, 23(3), pp.260~294 (2006)
  5. Cho, K., "Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives", Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), pp.891~901 (2006)
  6. Cho, Yunkyoung, "Complementarity of Peer and Teacher Feedback in Korean High School English Classes", 영어교육, 62(3), pp.307~329 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
  7. Chou, M. C., "How peer negotiations shape revisions, In The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching", pp.349~359 (1999), The Crane Publishing Co
  8. de Guerrero, M., "Social cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision", The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), pp.484~496 (1994)
  9. Ferris, D., "The iInfluence of teacher commentary on student revision", TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), pp.315~339 (1997)
  10. Flynn, E, "Freedom, restraint, and peer group interaction", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (1982)
  11. Graham, S., "A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students", Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, pp.445~476 (2007)
  12. Hansen, J., "Guiding principles for effective peer response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
  13. Haswell, R., "NCTE", CCCC’s recent war on scholarship, 2005, pp.22(2), 198~223
  14. 강동호, "Feedback on EFL Writing: Teacher, Peer, and Self-review", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  15. Kaufman, J., "Students’ perception about peer assessment for writing: their origin and on revision work", Instr Sci (2010)
  16. Kellogg, R., "Training advanced writing skills : The case for deliberate practice", Educational Psychologist, 44(4), pp.250~266 (2009)
  17. Leki, I., "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  18. Liu, J., "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, pp.193~227 (2003)
  19. Lockhart, C., "Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups : Stances, functions, and content", Language Learning, 45, pp.605~655 (1995)
  20. Mendonca, C., "Peer review negotiations : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 4, pp.745~769 (1994)
  21. Miao, Y., "A comparative study of peer and teacher Feedback in Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), pp.179~200 (2006)
  22. Min, H. T., "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33(2), pp.293~308 (2005)
  23. Min, H. T., "The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), pp.118~141 (2006)
  24. Mittan, R., "The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power, In Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  25. Nelson, G., "Peer response grpis: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", TESOL Quarterly, 27(1) (1993)
  26. Nelson, M., "The nature of feedback : How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance", Instructional Science, 27(4), pp.375~401 (2009)
  27. Paulus, T., "The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
  28. Patchan, M., "A validation study of students’ end comments : Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor", Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), pp.124~152 (2009)
  29. Patchan, M. M., "Writing in natural sciences : Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process", Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), pp.365~393 (2011)
  30. Peterson, S., "Peer response and students’ revisions of their narrative writing", L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, pp.239~272 (2003)
  31. Rollinson, P., "Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: A case study", 박사, pp.1998
  32. Saito, H., "Characteristics and use acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms", Language Teaching Research, 8(1), pp.31~54 (2004)
  33. Schriver, K., "Teaching writers to anticipate readers’ need", Written Communication, 9(2), pp.179~208 (1992)
  34. Stanley, J., "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.217~233 (1992)
  35. Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
  36. Villamil, O., "Peer revision in the second language classroom : Social cognitive activities, mediating strategies and aspects of social behavior", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), pp.51~75 (1996)
  37. Villamil, O., "Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing", Applied Linguistics, 19(4), pp.491~514 (1998)
  38. Wallace, D., "Redefining Revision for Freshmen", Research in Teaching of English, 25(1), pp.54~66 (1991)
  39. Wiener, H., "Collaborative Learning in the classroom : A guide to evaluation", College English, 48, pp.52~61 (1986)
  40. Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)