본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean Students’ Perspectives on and Use of Strategies in English Critical Writing

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives and strategies used in critical writing in English by Korean students who were studying in a university in the U.S. Four Korean students from different majors participated in the study. Data were collected through class observation, and individual interview of the students and the class teacher. Through careful analysis of the data, the study showed that contrary to the researcher’s expectation,the students viewed their lack of appropriate language proficiency in English rather than paucity of knowledge on the writing topics or how to write critically in English as the major contributing factors in difficulties involved in English writing. Along with this, the students’poor motivation towards writing and poor awareness of difference between American and Korean writing styles were identified as other factors influencing the quality of their written product. The study also revealed that the students employed a wide range of strategies, such as visiting a writing center, relying on their previous writing experience in Korea, or looking for a model to follow (Internet and library search, or samples provided by the teacher). Drawing on the findings, the study underscored the need for composition instructions that clarify the concept of critical writing in the second language (L2) and also address the different rhetorical writing styles between first language (L1) and L2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives and strategies used in critical writing in English by Korean students who were studying in a university in the U.S. Four Korean students from different majors participated in the study. Data were collected through class observation, and individual interview of the students and the class teacher. Through careful analysis of the data, the study showed that contrary to the researcher’s expectation,the students viewed their lack of appropriate language proficiency in English rather than paucity of knowledge on the writing topics or how to write critically in English as the major contributing factors in difficulties involved in English writing. Along with this, the students’poor motivation towards writing and poor awareness of difference between American and Korean writing styles were identified as other factors influencing the quality of their written product. The study also revealed that the students employed a wide range of strategies, such as visiting a writing center, relying on their previous writing experience in Korea, or looking for a model to follow (Internet and library search, or samples provided by the teacher). Drawing on the findings, the study underscored the need for composition instructions that clarify the concept of critical writing in the second language (L2) and also address the different rhetorical writing styles between first language (L1) and L2.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 안경자, "L2 Writer Identity: A College Student’s Multiple Identities Revealed in English Compositions", 영어교육연구, 24(1), pp.1~21 (2012), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  2. Alagozlu, N., "Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing", Asian EFL Quarterly, 9(3), pp.118~136 (1997)
  3. Atkinson, D., "Cultures of writing : An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing", language Programs, 1995, pp.29, 539~568
  4. Atkinson, D., "A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL", TESOL Quarterly, 31, pp.71~94 (1997)
  5. Barnet, S., "Current issues and enduring questions: A guide to critical thinking and argument with readings", pp.1999, Bedford
  6. Brown, H., "Affective factors in second language learning, In The second language classroom: Directions for the 1980s", pp.111~129 (1981), Oxford University Press
  7. Carroll, R. T., "Becoming a critical thinker" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  8. Chance, P., "Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs" (1986), Teachers College, Columbia University
  9. 조수경, "The Effects of Giving Peer Feedback: Case Studies of Korean Learners of English", 영어학연구, 17(2), pp.101~125 (2011), 한국영어학학회
  10. Connor, U., "Changing currents in contrastive rhetoric: Implications for teaching and research, In Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.218~224 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  11. Cumming, A., "Writing expertise and second language proficiency, In Bilingual performance in reading and writing", pp.173~221 (1994), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  12. Ellis, R., "Second language acquisition" (1997), Oxford University Press
  13. Goetz, J., "Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research" (1984), Academic Press
  14. Gredler, G. R., "Early childhood education assessment and intervention: What the future holds", Psychology in the Schools, 37(1), pp.73~79 (2000)
  15. Green, A. M., "A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender", TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp.261~297 (1995)
  16. Johns, A., "Text, role and context" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  17. 주미진, "과정 중심 접근법을 기반으로 한 효과적 영작문수업 방안 모색", 영어학, 10(1), pp.131~150 (2010), 한국영어학회
  18. 주미진, "Teacher and peer feedback: Learner perceptions and the efficacy for improvement in L2 writing", 영어교육연구, 22(3), pp.1~21 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  19. Kaplan, B. R., "Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education", Language Learning, 56, pp.1~20 (1996)
  20. 김양희, "Process Approach to Writing: University Students’ Scaffolding Learning and Reflections", 언어과학, 17(2), pp.99~130 (2010), 한국언어과학회
  21. Kubota, R., "A reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese written discourse", Written Communication, 14, pp.460~480 (1997)
  22. Kubota, R., "An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students : Implications for contrastive rhetoric", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), pp.69~100 (1998)
  23. Lee, C., "Building upon Korean writing practices: Genres, values and beliefs, In Cross-cultural literacy: Global perspectives on reading and writing", pp.1992, Regents
  24. Leki, I., "Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum", TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp.235~260 (1995)
  25. Mohan, A. B., "Academic writing and Chinese students : Transfer and developmental factors", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.515~534 (1985)
  26. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning styles and strategies, In Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.359~366 (2001), Heinle, Cengage Learning
  27. 박귀숙, "Korean Students’Opinions on and Strategies for American English Writing in the US", 영어교육연구, 21(1), pp.45~69 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  28. Prior, P., "Redefining tasks: Academic writing in six graduate courses", Paper presented at the 26th annual TESOL conference (1992)
  29. Raimes, A., "Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers, In Bilingual performance in reading and writing", pp.139~172 (1994), John Benjamins Publishing Co
  30. Ramanathan, V., "Audience and voice in current composition texts: Some implications for ESL student writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.21~34 (1996)
  31. Ryder, R. J., "Using frames to promote critical writing", Journal of Reading, 38, pp.210~218 (1994)
  32. 류미림, "Long-term Effects of Written Corrective Feedback on Korean EFL Students’ Writing", 영어교육연구, 23(4), pp.141~156 (2012), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  33. Santos, T., "The place of politics in second language writing, In On second language writing", pp.173~190 (2001), Erlbaum
  34. 신유선, "Investigating Variability in Tasks, Analytic Scoring Criteria, and Rater Groups on L2 Writing in English", Foreign Languages Education, 17(2), pp.27~57 (2010), 한국외국어교육학회
  35. Stapleton, P., "Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: Rethinking tired constructs", ELT Journal, 56(3), pp.250~257 (2002)
  36. Zamel, V., "The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies", TESOL Quarterly, 17, pp.165~187 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)