본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

L2 Writing Practice as Consciousness-Raising for Korean College Students

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Writing instruction has not been actively implemented in secondary schools in Korea, even though the National Curriculum suggests teaching all four communication skills in a balanced way. Taking the aforementioned into account in terms of continuity between secondary and higher education, this study explores college students’ perceptions of writing in English through their actual writing experiences. Over fifty local area students who were advised to keep journals provided their ideas and thoughts on why English writing is hard for them. Data revealed that writing practice made the students aware of their lack of L2 knowledge, such as grammatical, syntactic, or lexical aspects. As the students developed their basic L2 knowledge, they recognized their need for L2 writing instruction. Some students revealed their anxiety through their writing. Others looked back on their learning in the past and reflected upon its shortcomings. Several attentive learners who showed interests in English learning provided their opinions on L2 writing. With the advent of the National English Ability Test (NEAT), the English education environment in Korea will be changing. Thus, more output-oriented communicative activities and more opportunities for output need to be introduced in Korean English education arena for meaningful learning process.

Abstract

Writing instruction has not been actively implemented in secondary schools in Korea, even though the National Curriculum suggests teaching all four communication skills in a balanced way. Taking the aforementioned into account in terms of continuity between secondary and higher education, this study explores college students’ perceptions of writing in English through their actual writing experiences. Over fifty local area students who were advised to keep journals provided their ideas and thoughts on why English writing is hard for them. Data revealed that writing practice made the students aware of their lack of L2 knowledge, such as grammatical, syntactic, or lexical aspects. As the students developed their basic L2 knowledge, they recognized their need for L2 writing instruction. Some students revealed their anxiety through their writing. Others looked back on their learning in the past and reflected upon its shortcomings. Several attentive learners who showed interests in English learning provided their opinions on L2 writing. With the advent of the National English Ability Test (NEAT), the English education environment in Korea will be changing. Thus, more output-oriented communicative activities and more opportunities for output need to be introduced in Korean English education arena for meaningful learning process.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Block, D., "Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA", Applied Linguistics, 17, pp.63~83 (1996)
  2. 조윤경, "Effects of Different Types of Focus-on-form Instruction and Learner readinesson the Learning of Perfective Modals", Foreign Languages Education, 18(2), pp.1~27 (2011), 한국외국어교육학회
  3. Doughty, C., "Pedagogical choice in focus on form, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.197~261 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  4. Dunn, W. E., "Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and Krashen’s i+1: Incommensurable constructs; Incommensurable theories", Language Learning, 48(3), pp.411~442 (1998)
  5. Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.)" (2008), Oxford University Press
  6. Finch, A., "Critical incidents and language learning: Sensitivity to initial conditions", System, 38, pp.22~431 (2010)
  7. Gass, S. M., "Second language acquisition: An introductory course" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  8. Guerrero, M. C. M. de, "Inner speech - L2: Thinking words in a second language" (2005), Springer
  9. Hahn, Jung-Won, "Exploring Korean EFL University Students’ Perceptions of Grammar Instruction", 영어교육, 61(3), pp.29~43 (2006), 한국영어교육학회
  10. Hillocks, G., "Teaching writing as reflective practice" (1995), Teachers College Press
  11. Holsti, O. R., "Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities" (1969), Addison-Wesley
  12. 홍신철, "EFL Learners’ Consciousness-Raising through a Corpus-Based Approach", 영어교육, 65(1), pp.57~86 (2010), 한국영어교육학회
  13. Huh, Myung-Hye, "Translation strategy in EFL writing", English Teaching, 56(4), pp.75~92 (2001)
  14. Huh, Myung-Hye, "Expanding the contexts for EFL literacy through electronic communication", Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 17(2), pp.73~90 (2001)
  15. Izumi, S., "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, pp.541~577 (2002)
  16. 전지현, "Key Issues in Applying the Communicative Approach in Korea: Follow up after 12 Years of Implementation", 영어교육, 64(4), pp.123~150 (2009), 한국영어교육학회
  17. AeJin Kang, "How to Better Serve EFL College Writers: An MP Implication for L2 Literacy Teaching", Foreign Languages Education, 10(4), pp.101~128 (2003), 한국외국어교육학회
  18. Kern, R., "Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literacy in second and foreign language instruction", The Modern Language Journal, 89, pp.381~392 (2005)
  19. 김재경, "A comparison of input-enhanced and output-enhanced grammar instruction", 응용언어학, 26(2), pp.241~269 (2010), 한국응용언어학회
  20. 김재경, "The Effects of Input-based vs. Output-oriented Focus-on-form Instructions on the Acquisition of English Present Perfect Tense and Passive Voice", Foreign Languages Education, 17(3), pp.25~50 (2010), 한국외국어교육학회
  21. 김경자, "Writing Strategies and Writing Proficiency in the EFL Classroom", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.69~89 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  22. Knouzi, I., "Self-scaffolding mediated by languaging : Microgenetic analysis of high and low performers", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), pp.23~49 (2010)
  23. Krippendorff, K., "Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.)" (2004), Sage
  24. Kwon, Oryang, "A Comparison of English Proficiency of Korean, Japanese and Chinese High School Students", 영어교육, 59(4), pp.3~22 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  25. "Modern Language Journal", 1994, ~
  26. Lantolf, J. P., "Sociocultural theory and L2", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.67~109 (2006)
  27. Lantolf, J. P., "Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom, In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning", pp.303~318 (2011), Routledge
  28. Lantolf, J. P., "Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspective on second language research, In Vygotskian approaches to second language learning", pp.1~32 (1994), Ablex
  29. Lightbown, P., "How languages are learned (3rd ed.)" (2006), Oxford University Press
  30. McDonough, J., "Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher's guide" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
  31. Min, Chan-Kyoo, "The Effects of Dialogue Journal Writing on Korean High School EFL Writing Education", 영어교육, 60(4), pp.71~86 (2005), 한국영어교육학회
  32. Nassaji, H., "Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.126~145 (2004)
  33. Olshtain, E., "Functional tasks for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond, In Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.207~217 (2001), Heinle & Heinle
  34. Oxford, R. L., "Telling their stories: Language students use diaries and recollection, In Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives", pp.19~34 (1996), University of Hawaii Press
  35. Poehner, M. E., "Group dynamic assessment : mediation for the L2 classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), pp.471~491 (2009)
  36. Qi, D. S., "Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), pp.277~303 (2001)
  37. Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11(2), pp.129~158 (1990)
  38. Swain, M., "Focus on form through conscious reflection, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.64~81 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  39. Swain, M., "The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.97~114 (2000), Oxford University Press
  40. Swain, M., "New mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched", The Modern Language Journal, 91, pp.820~836 (2007)
  41. Swain, M., "Sociocultural theory in second language education : An introduction through narratives" (2011), Multilingual Matters
  42. van Lier, L., "Forks and hope: Pursuing understanding in different ways", Applied Linguistics, 15, pp.328~347 (1994)
  43. Vogt, W. P., "Dictionary of statistical methodology : A nontechnical guide for the social sciences(3rd ed. )" (2005), Sage
  44. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  45. Yang, Miran, "A Comparison of the Efficacy Between Input-based Instruction and Output-based Instruction in Focus on Form", 영어교육, 59(2), pp.145~164 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  46. 유현정, "학술지 논문을 통한 영어교육학 연구동향 분석", Foreign Languages Education, 13(3), pp.339~368 (2006), 한국외국어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)