대학생의 자기주도학습력과 온라인 과제가치인식이 수업만족도와 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
The effects of university students’ self-directed learning ability and perceived online task value on learning satisfaction and academic achievement
0
조회
0
다운로드
45
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of self-regulated learning ability and perceivedonline task value on learning satisfaction and academic achievement among university students. The research questions are as follows: (1) Do university students’ self-regulated learning abilityand perceived online task value have effect on learning satisfaction? and (2) Do universitystudents’ self-regulated learning ability and perceived online task value have effect on academicachievement? Data were collected from 136 university students. Analysis of variance (ANOVA)and regression analysis were performed. Major findings of the study were as follows: First, bothself-regulated learning ability and perceived online task value had a significant effect onlearning satisfaction; and second, only self-regulated learning ability had a significant effect onlearner’s academic achievement but there was no significant correlation between perceivedonline task value and academic achievement.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of self-regulated learning ability and perceivedonline task value on learning satisfaction and academic achievement among university students. The research questions are as follows: (1) Do university students’ self-regulated learning abilityand perceived online task value have effect on learning satisfaction? and (2) Do universitystudents’ self-regulated learning ability and perceived online task value have effect on academicachievement? Data were collected from 136 university students. Analysis of variance (ANOVA)and regression analysis were performed. Major findings of the study were as follows: First, bothself-regulated learning ability and perceived online task value had a significant effect onlearning satisfaction; and second, only self-regulated learning ability had a significant effect onlearner’s academic achievement but there was no significant correlation between perceivedonline task value and academic achievement.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강숙희, "중학교 사이버수업에서 운영유형이 학업성취도와 학습만족도에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 19(3), pp.231~259 (2003), 한국교육공학회
- 김성일, "한국 학생의 학업에 대한 흥미: 실태, 진단 및 처방", 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 14, pp.187~221 (2008), 한국문화및사회문제심리학회
- 김소희, "사이버대학 학습자의 성격유형, 자기주도성, 정보기술에 대한 태도 및 자기효능감과 학업성취도 간의 관계 규명", 교육정보미디어연구, 13(2), pp.79~106 (2007), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 김승현, "제6차 중학교 가정과 교육과정에 대한 인식도와 학습 만족도 및 주관적 학습 효과 연구", 한국가정과 교육학회지, 9(2), pp.47~67 (1997)
- 박혜정, "대학 교육에서 e-러닝의 학습효과와 관련된변인들의 관계 분석", 교육공학연구, 24(1), pp.27~53 (2008), 한국교육공학회
- 서선주, "사이버대학생들의 중도탈락 요인에 관한 연구", 석사, 평생교육, pp.2004
- 오은진, "사이버 학습자들의 학습 유형이 학습 만족도에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 20(3), pp.73~99 (2004), 한국교육공학회
- 劉貴玉, "成人學習者의 自己主導性과 人口學的 및 社會心理學的 變因 연구", 박사, 농촌사회교육, pp.1997
- 유평준, "원격대학원 온라인 수업의 학습참여도, 학업성취도, 및 학습만족도에 미치는 학습자 관련 변인원격대학원 온라인 수업의 학습참여도, 학업성취도, 및 학습만족도에 미치는 학습자 관련 변인", 교육정보미디어연구, 9(4), pp.229~267 (2003), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 이인숙, "e-Learning 환경에서의 자기조절학습전략, 자기효능감과 e-Learning학습전략 수준 및 학업성취도 관련성 규명", 교육공학연구, 19(3), pp.41~68 (2003), 한국교육공학회
- 이종연, "웹 기반 교육에서 학습자의 자기주도성 및 사전지식과 전달전략이 학습만족도와 학업성취도에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 18(3), pp.3~25 (2002), 한국교육공학회
- 임정훈, "상호작용 관점에서 조망해 본 웹기반 교육의 이론적 기저", 교육공학연구, 15(3), pp.29~54 (1999)
- 김경현, "사이버 교원 연수의 운영 실태 분석 - 국내 사이버 교원연수기관을 중심으로 -", 한국교원교육연구, 21(3), pp.135~162 (2004), 한국교원교육학회
- 정인성, "평생교육을 위한 웹 기반 학습에서 상호작용 유형에 따른 효과 분석", 교육공학연구, 16(1), pp.223~246 (2000)
- 주영주, "사이버대학생의 학업적 자기효능감, 자기조절학습능력 및 온라인과제가치와 만족도 및 성취도간의 관계 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 14(3), pp.115~135 (2008), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 주영주, "사이버대학교 공학계열 학생들의 숙달접근목표지향성, 과제가치, 자기조절학습전략의 학업만족도와 학업성취도 예측력 규명", 전자공학회논문지 - IE, 49(2), pp.65~74 (2012), 대한전자공학회
- 하영자, "온라인 학습자의 과제가치와 학습전략이 학습만족도 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 10(3), pp.577~598 (2010), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 한순미, "학습동기 변인들과 인지전략 및 학업성취간의 관계", 교육심리연구, 18(1), pp.329~350 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
- Ary, D., "Introduction to research in education", pp.2002, Wadsworth
- Atkinson, J. W., "Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior", Psychological review, 64(1), pp.359~372 (1957)
- Bong, M., "Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students’course performance and future enrollment intentions", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), pp.553~570 (2001)
- Candy, P. C., "Advances in research and practice in self-directed learning", pp.9~46 (1990), Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma
- Cotterall, S., "Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses", ELT Journal, 54, pp.109~117 (2000)
- Curry, M., "The analysis of self-directed learning readiness characteristics in older adults engaged in formal learning activities in two settings", doctor, pp.1983
- Eccles, J., "Age and gender differences in children’s self-and task perceptions during elementary school", Child Development, 64, pp.830~847 (1993)
- Guglielmino, L. M., "Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale", doctor, pp.1977
- Garrison, D. R., "Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice", pp.53~62 (1989), Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma
- Husman, J., "Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation : Making sense of their independent interdependence", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, pp.63~76 (2004)
- Kim, K., "Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning;Benefits, challenges, and suggestions", The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), pp.335~344 (2005)
- Knowles, M. S., "Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers" (1975), Follet Publishing Company
- Levy, Y., "Comparing dropouts persistence in e-learning courses", Computers & Education, 48(2), pp.185~204 (2007)
- Long, H. B., "Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice", pp.1~12 (1989), Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education
- Long H. B., "Self-directed learning: Consensus and conflict", pp.107~122 (1991), Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education
- Long, H. B., "Self-directed learning: Application and research", pp.189~208 (1993), Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education
- McCune, S. K., "Advances in self-directed learning research", pp.145~156 (1990), Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education
- Morris, S. S., "The Relationship between self-directed learning readiness and academic performance in a non-traditional higher education program", doctor, pp.1995
- Pintrich, P. R., "Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp.33~40 (1990)
- Pintrich, P. R., "Students perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Schunk, D. H., "Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application" (2010), Pearson Education, Inc.
- Shin, N. M., "Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning", Distance Education, 24(1), pp.69~86 (2003)
- Stein, J. J., "Asynchronous computer conferencing as a supplement to classroom instruction in higher education: The impact of selected learner characteristics on user satisfaction and the amount of interaction", doctor, pp.1997
- Stipeck, D., "Motivation to learn from theory to practice" (1998), Allyn & Bacon
- Volery, T., "Online education : An exploratory study into success factors", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), pp.77~92 (2001)
- West, R., "Self-directed learning:Consensus and conflict", pp.71~92 (1991), Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education
- Wigfield, A., "The development of achievement task values : A theoretical analysis", Development Review, 12, pp.265~310 (1992)
- Yukselturk, E., "Predictors for student success in an online course", Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), pp.71~83 (2007)
- Zimmerman, B. J., "Student differences in self-regulated learning : Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use", Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp.51~59 (1990)
