한국인 학습자들이 에세이에서 사용한 구어 담화표지어에 관한 연구
A study of Korean learners’ use of speech-like discourse markers in the argumentative essays.
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the study is to examine Korean learners’ use of speech-like discourse markers in the argumentative essays. Since the discourse marker is more peculiar to spoken language rather than written, it can help understand Korean learners’ acquisition of their target language in terms of style. For this end, the study adopts two learner corpora and a reference corpus: Korean International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE), the Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), and the British National Corpus (BNC) Sampler. With these corpora, the analysis is based on the Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (CIA). From the quantitative perspective, the general frequency patterns of the speech-like discourse markers are analysed to investigate similarities and differences between Korean learners and native learners and overused/underused types with the calculation of Log-likelihood values. From the qualitative perspective, Korean learners’ stylistic features used in the argumentative essays are compared with those of native learners and native speakers in the reference corpus. The results of the study show that Korean learners overused the speech-like discourse markers in the comparison of native learners. One of the interesting points in this regard is both Korean and native learners overused them when compared to written data from the BNC sampler. One possible explanation is that their overused discourse markers may be related to the influence of writing argumentative essays. (221 words)
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to examine Korean learners’ use of speech-like discourse markers in the argumentative essays. Since the discourse marker is more peculiar to spoken language rather than written, it can help understand Korean learners’ acquisition of their target language in terms of style. For this end, the study adopts two learner corpora and a reference corpus: Korean International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE), the Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), and the British National Corpus (BNC) Sampler. With these corpora, the analysis is based on the Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (CIA). From the quantitative perspective, the general frequency patterns of the speech-like discourse markers are analysed to investigate similarities and differences between Korean learners and native learners and overused/underused types with the calculation of Log-likelihood values. From the qualitative perspective, Korean learners’ stylistic features used in the argumentative essays are compared with those of native learners and native speakers in the reference corpus. The results of the study show that Korean learners overused the speech-like discourse markers in the comparison of native learners. One of the interesting points in this regard is both Korean and native learners overused them when compared to written data from the BNC sampler. One possible explanation is that their overused discourse markers may be related to the influence of writing argumentative essays. (221 words)
참고문헌 (20)
- 홍신철, "한국인 중‧상위 학습자들의 n-gram 비교분석", 언어과학, 22(1), pp.147~170 (2015), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Anderson, G., "Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents" (2001), John Benjamins Publishing
- Aijimer, K., "English discourse particles: evidence from a corpus" (2002), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Aijimer, K., "Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(1), pp.173~190 (2004)
- Aijimer. K., "Pragmatic markers in contrast" (2006), Elsevier
- Babanoğlu, M., "A corpus-based study on the use of pragmatic markers as speech-like features in Turkish EFL learners’ argumentative essays", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 136, pp.186~193 (2014)
- Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
- Carter, R., "Cambridge grammar of English" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Crawford, W., "Is L2 writing like native-English conversation? Paper presented at ICAME 26-AAACL6", pp.2005
- Fisher, K., "From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Fraser, B., "An account of discourse markers", International Review of Pragmatics, 1, pp.293~320 (2009)
- Gilquim, G, "Spoken features in learner academic writing: identification, explanation and solution", Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference (2007)
- Granger, S., "Languages in contrast", pp.37~51 (1996), Lund University Press
- Granger, S., "Learner English on computer", pp.3~18 (1998), Longman
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Masatienė, D, "Discourse markers in English and Lithuanian", Kalbotyra, Nr, 53(3), pp.64~70 (2003)
- Šimčikaitė, A., "Spoken discourse markers in learner academic writing", Studies about Language, 20, pp.27~34 (2012)
- Pridham, F., "The language of conversation" (2001), Routledge Tayler & Francis Group
- Rayson P., "Extending the Cochran rule for the comparison of word frequencies between corpora", Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT 2004), pp.926~936 (2004)
- Ziyagham, F., "Speech-like pragmatic markers in argumentative essays written by Iranian EFL students and native English speaking students", International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 6(21), pp.133~145 (2018)