CP-서술화를 이용한 tough-구문 분석
CP-Predication and Tough-Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The major problems of tough-constructions are (i) whether or not the tough-predicate assign an external θ-role, (ii) how the locality and case-theoretic problems in tough-constructions can be explained, and (iii) how the A-movement and A’-movement properties of tough-constructions can be accounted for. We argue that problems in tough-constructions can be explained under the concept of CP-predication, suggested by Idan Landau(2009). Since Chomsky(1977), the predicative function of CPs has been demonstrated for CPs that contain a gap such as copy raising constructions and tough-constructions. Landau(2009) argues that it has been clear that (i) the gap is formed by movement, and (ii) the CP is turned into a predicate by the operator-gap dependency. In conclusion, we suggest the following two points. First, the tough-subject that can not be licensed by tough-predicate can be licensed by the embedded CP-predication. Second, the tough-subject is moved from [Spec, vP] into [Spec, TP].
Abstract
The major problems of tough-constructions are (i) whether or not the tough-predicate assign an external θ-role, (ii) how the locality and case-theoretic problems in tough-constructions can be explained, and (iii) how the A-movement and A’-movement properties of tough-constructions can be accounted for. We argue that problems in tough-constructions can be explained under the concept of CP-predication, suggested by Idan Landau(2009). Since Chomsky(1977), the predicative function of CPs has been demonstrated for CPs that contain a gap such as copy raising constructions and tough-constructions. Landau(2009) argues that it has been clear that (i) the gap is formed by movement, and (ii) the CP is turned into a predicate by the operator-gap dependency. In conclusion, we suggest the following two points. First, the tough-subject that can not be licensed by tough-predicate can be licensed by the embedded CP-predication. Second, the tough-subject is moved from [Spec, vP] into [Spec, TP].
참고문헌 (32)
- Berman,A, "A Constraint on Tough-Movement", Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.34~43 (1973)
- Brody,M, "θ-Theory and Arguments", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.1~23 (1993)
- Browning,M, "Null Operator Constructions", 박사, pp.1987
- Chomsky,N, "Current Issues in Linguistic Theory" (1964), Mouton & Co
- Chomsky,N, "On Wh-Movement. in:Formal Syntax", pp.77~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky,N, "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" (1982), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N., "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework. in:Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Derivation by Phase. in:Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Beyond the Explanatory Adequacy. in:Structures and Beyond", pp.104~131 (2004)
- Chomsky,N., "On Phases", 석사, pp.2005
- Chomsky,N, "Approaching UG from Below", 석사, pp.2006
- Contreras,H, "On Null Operator Structures", NLLT, 11, pp.1~30 (1993)
- Hicks G, "So Easy to Look at So hard to Define: Tough Constructions and Their Derivation", 석사, pp.2004
- Hicks G, "Talking Tough: a Minimalist Account for Tough-Movement", 석사, pp.2004
- Holmberg,A, "Am I Unscientific? a reply to Lappin, Levine, and Johnson", NLLT, 18, pp.837~842 (2000)
- Hornstein,N, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein,N, "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Landau. I, "Predication vs. Aboutness in Copy Raising", 석사, pp.2009
- Lasnik, H, "Complement Object Deletion", LI, 5, pp.535~572 (1974)
- Levine,D, "Tough Complementation and the Extraclausal Propagation of Argument Descriptions", 석사, pp.2000
- Miller, A, "Finitary Models of Language Users. in:Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2" (1963), John Wiley and Sons
- Miller, P, "French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement", NLLT, 15, pp.573~639 (1997)
- Pesetsky,D, "Binding Problems with Experiencer Verbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.203~238 (1987)
- Polinsky, M, "Long-distance Agreement and Topic in Tsez", NLLT, 19, pp.583~646 (2001)
- Postal,M, "On Raising" (1974), MIT Press.
- Rezac,M, "On Tough Movement", 석사, pp.2004
- Rosenbaum.S, "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions" (1967), MIT Press
- Tanaka,H, "On the Categorial Status of Raising Complements", York Papers in Linguistics, 1, pp.213~222 (2004)
- Williams,E, "Representation Theory" (2003), MIT Press