Tough-구문에 대한 국면에 기초한 최소주의 접근법
A Phase-Based Minimalist Approach to Tough-Constructions
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to examine several problems regarding tough-constructions (TC) which have been considerably controversial since the very beginning of the Generative Grammar and to present possible solutions to them within the theoretical framework of the Phase-Based Minimalism. It is argued that those problems concerning TC have stemmed from the so-called A-movement approach in which TC can be derived from expletive-TC, referred to as non-tough-constructions (NTC) in this paper, by a kind of transformational rule. It is also argued that the approach has relied too heavily on the GB concepts, such as the levels of representation, taken to be conceptually and empirically unnecessary in Minimalism. Therefore, this paper proposes that, in the analyses of TC, we adopt an A'-movement approach instead of the A-movement one and the phase-based minimalist approach instead of the GB-style representational one. By doing so, we present relatively successful solutions to such controversial TC-related problems as the θ-role assignment problem, the Case-checking/assignment problem, the locality problem, the movement motivation problem, and the scope problem
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to examine several problems regarding tough-constructions (TC) which have been considerably controversial since the very beginning of the Generative Grammar and to present possible solutions to them within the theoretical framework of the Phase-Based Minimalism. It is argued that those problems concerning TC have stemmed from the so-called A-movement approach in which TC can be derived from expletive-TC, referred to as non-tough-constructions (NTC) in this paper, by a kind of transformational rule. It is also argued that the approach has relied too heavily on the GB concepts, such as the levels of representation, taken to be conceptually and empirically unnecessary in Minimalism. Therefore, this paper proposes that, in the analyses of TC, we adopt an A'-movement approach instead of the A-movement one and the phase-based minimalist approach instead of the GB-style representational one. By doing so, we present relatively successful solutions to such controversial TC-related problems as the θ-role assignment problem, the Case-checking/assignment problem, the locality problem, the movement motivation problem, and the scope problem
참고문헌 (30)
- Berman,A, "A Constraint on Tough-Movement", Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.34~43 (1973)
- Brody, M, "Ɵ-Theory and Arguments", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.1~23 (1993)
- Browning,M, "Null Operator Constructions", 박사, pp.1987
- Carnie,A, "Syntax" (2002), Blackwell
- Chomsky,N, "Current Issues In Linguistic Theory" (1964), Mouton & Co
- Chomsky,N, "Conditions on Transformations in A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~285 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Chomsky,N, "On Wh-Movement in Formal Syntax", pp.77~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework in Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~105 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by Phase in Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy" (2001), MIT
- Chomsky, N, "Three Factors in Language Design", also reprinted in Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2004)
- Chomsky,N, "On Phases" (2005), MIT
- Chomsky,N, "Approaching UG from below" (2006), MIT
- Culicover,P.W, "Principles and Parameters" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Hartman,J, "Intervention in Tough-Constructions" (2009), MIT
- Holmberg,A, "Am I Unscientific? A Reply to Lappin, Levine, and Johnson", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, pp.837~842 (2001)
- Hornstein,N, "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Hornstein, N, "Understanding Minimalism" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Lasnik, H, "Complement Object Deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 5(4), pp.535~572 (1974)
- McCawley,J.F, "The Syntactic Phenomena of English" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
- Miller, P, "French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, pp.573~639 (1997)
- Pesetsky,D, "Binding Problems with Experiencer Verbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.203~238 (1987)
- Radford, A, "Minimalist Syntax" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Rezac.M, "On Tough-Movement" (2004), University of the Basque Country
- Rosenbaum, P. S, "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions" (1965), MIT
- Richards, M. D, "On Feature Inheritance: An Argument from the PIC", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.563~572 (2007)
- Tellier, C, "Underived Nominals and the Projection Principle: Inherent Possessors", In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 20, pp.472~486 (1990)
- Williams, E, "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)