Do learners correct toward the target language? Repairs in adult L2 learner interaction
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined error repairs in interactions among learners in a low-intermediate level adult ESL classroom. Specifically, the focus of the study was twofold: 1) to examine the types of repairs found in L2 learner interaction; 2) to investigate the direction of L2 learners’ repairs and incorporations; that is, whether learners’ repairs and incorporation of the repairs occurred toward the direction of the target language. The findings of the study coincided with previous research showing lexical repairs occurring most frequently with repairs generally occurring in the correct direction. Yet, the study also revealed that although the L2 learners in the present study were capable of providing varied types of repairs, the learners’ repair performances remained limited. The learners also seemed to display a higher rate of miscorrections than found in previous research, and they largely ended up incorporating incorrect repairs. The findings suggest the view of learners as language learning resources for each other should be accepted with caution and bring attention to careful considerations for adopting learner interaction in the L2 classroom.
Abstract
This study examined error repairs in interactions among learners in a low-intermediate level adult ESL classroom. Specifically, the focus of the study was twofold: 1) to examine the types of repairs found in L2 learner interaction; 2) to investigate the direction of L2 learners’ repairs and incorporations; that is, whether learners’ repairs and incorporation of the repairs occurred toward the direction of the target language. The findings of the study coincided with previous research showing lexical repairs occurring most frequently with repairs generally occurring in the correct direction. Yet, the study also revealed that although the L2 learners in the present study were capable of providing varied types of repairs, the learners’ repair performances remained limited. The learners also seemed to display a higher rate of miscorrections than found in previous research, and they largely ended up incorporating incorrect repairs. The findings suggest the view of learners as language learning resources for each other should be accepted with caution and bring attention to careful considerations for adopting learner interaction in the L2 classroom.
참고문헌 (22)
- Brown, H. D., "Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy" (2001), Addison Wesley Longman
- Bruton, A., "Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work", RELC Journal, 11(2), pp.49~63 (1980)
- Chaudron, C., "Teachers’ priorities in correcting learners’ errors in French immersion classes. In,Talking to learn", pp.64~84 (1986), Newbury House
- Chun, A. E., "Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native-nonnative conversations", TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), pp.537~546 (1982)
- Day, R. R., "Corrective feedback in native-nonnative discourse", Language Learning, 34, pp.19~46 (1984)
- Foster, P., "A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning", Applied Linguistics, 19(1), pp.1~23 (1998)
- Gass, S., "Input, interaction, and the second language learner" (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Gass, S. M., "Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In, The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation", pp.71~86 (1989), Plenum
- declination. In, Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, "A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance", pp.1979, Jefferson, G.
- Jung, J.-K., "Patterns and preferences of corrective feedback and learner repair", Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(1), pp.243~260 (2007)
- Kim, Y.-K., "The teacher and learners as language models for learning English: Language and interaction in the adult ESL classroom", 박사, pp.2006
- Long, M. H., "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In, Handbook of second language acquisition", pp.413~468 (1996), Academic Press
- Long, M. H., "Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition", TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), pp.207~228 (1985)
- Lyster, R., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), pp.37~66 (1997)
- McDonough, K., "Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context", System, 32, pp.207~224 (2004)
- Ohta, A. S, "Peer interactive tasks and assisted performance in classroom language learning. In, Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese", pp.73~128 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Pica, T., "Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?", Language Learning, 44, pp.493~527 (1994)
- Pica, T., "Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?", TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), pp.59~84 (1996)
- Porter, P. A., "Variations in the conversations of adult learners of English as a function of the proficiency level of the participants", 박사, pp.1983
- Schiffrin, D, "Approaches to discourse. Malden" (1994), Blackwell Publishers
- Schulz, R. A., "Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia", The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), pp.244~258 (2001)
- Varonis, E. M., "Non-native", non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning, 1985, pp.6(1), 71~90
