영어 듣기 능력 및 소집단 구성 방식이 학습자 상호 작용 및 영어 듣기 능력 발달에 미치는 영향
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study was conducted to compare two types of group composition and their effects on English listening proficiency development and collaborative learner interactions in a 12-session dictogloss instruction. Participants of the study were 141 Korean middle school students. They worked collaboratively either in homogeneous or heterogeneous small groups divided based on their English listening proficiency levels. Outcomes of pre-post English listening proficiency assessments showed that the two types of group composition (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) did not differ in their effects on the participants’ achievements. The group composition types also showed no differential effects on English listening proficiencies across three differential proficiency levels of students (advanced, intermediate, low). The analyses of language-related episodes produced within 12 focal groups indicated no differential patterns in collaborative learner interactions between homogenous and heterogeneous small groups. Yet there was some evidence indicating that intermediate and low-level students might be more benefited when they were in heterogeneous groups. Overall, the study results suggested that collaborative learning could be effective either in a homogeneous or heterogeneous small group as well as across different language proficiency levels of students.
Abstract
The study was conducted to compare two types of group composition and their effects on English listening proficiency development and collaborative learner interactions in a 12-session dictogloss instruction. Participants of the study were 141 Korean middle school students. They worked collaboratively either in homogeneous or heterogeneous small groups divided based on their English listening proficiency levels. Outcomes of pre-post English listening proficiency assessments showed that the two types of group composition (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) did not differ in their effects on the participants’ achievements. The group composition types also showed no differential effects on English listening proficiencies across three differential proficiency levels of students (advanced, intermediate, low). The analyses of language-related episodes produced within 12 focal groups indicated no differential patterns in collaborative learner interactions between homogenous and heterogeneous small groups. Yet there was some evidence indicating that intermediate and low-level students might be more benefited when they were in heterogeneous groups. Overall, the study results suggested that collaborative learning could be effective either in a homogeneous or heterogeneous small group as well as across different language proficiency levels of students.
참고문헌 (20)
- 박정주, "중학교 영어 문법 수업에서 Dictogloss의 효과에 관한 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 16(1), pp.147~171 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
- 이기정, "Middle school English 2" (2009), 비상교육
- 이수진, "딕토글로스 활동에서 모국어를 통한 의미협상과 영어쓰기 활동이 영어말하기에 미치는 영향", 영어교육연구, 22(3), pp.117~142 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- Cohen,E.G, "Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups", Review of Educational Research, 64, pp.1~35 (1994)
- Donato,R, "Beyond Group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning", 박사, pp.1988
- Greenfield,P.M, "A theory of teacher in learning activities of everyday life, in Everyday cognition: Its development in social context", pp.117~138 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Johnson, D. W., "Cooperative learning in the classroom" (2001), ASCD
- Kagan,S, "Cooperative learning" (1994), Kagan Publishing
- Kim, Y., "The effect of interlocutor proficiency of the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners", Language Teaching Research, 12(2), pp.211~234 (2008)
- Kuiken, F., "The effects of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language", International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), pp.343~358 (2002)
- LaPierre,D, "Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning", 석사, pp.1994
- Lesser,M.J, "Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue", Language Teaching Research, 8(1), pp.55~81 (2004)
- Michaelson, L. K., "Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups" (2002), Greenwood Publishing Group
- Storch,N, "How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pair", Language Teaching Research, 5, pp.29~53 (2001)
- Storch,N, "Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes", Language Teaching Research, 11(2), pp.143~159 (2007)
- Swain, M., "Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects, In Research pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing", pp.99~118 (2001), Harlow
- van Lier,L, "Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity" (1996), Longman
- Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Wajnryb, R, "Grammar dictation" (1990), University Press
- Watanabe, Y., "Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners", Language Teaching Research, 11(2), pp.121~142 (2007)