영어 심리동사 구문의 변천에 관하여
On the Change of Psych-Constructions in English
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Old English, the psychological verbs were semantically classified based on the semantics of action and state rather than the transitivity. When an argument was coded by the case inflection, impersonal constructions with psychological verbs had the argument of a human experiencer and a theme. They were coded by different case markers such as nominative, accusative and dative. Each of the case marked argument represented a distinct semantic function. In Middle and Modern English, the Old English impersonal psych-constructions disappeared. It was due to the loss of case endings and the use of the subject-verb order. Now we came to have grammatical relations such as subject and object for describing Modern English
Abstract
In Old English, the psychological verbs were semantically classified based on the semantics of action and state rather than the transitivity. When an argument was coded by the case inflection, impersonal constructions with psychological verbs had the argument of a human experiencer and a theme. They were coded by different case markers such as nominative, accusative and dative. Each of the case marked argument represented a distinct semantic function. In Middle and Modern English, the Old English impersonal psych-constructions disappeared. It was due to the loss of case endings and the use of the subject-verb order. Now we came to have grammatical relations such as subject and object for describing Modern English
참고문헌 (26)
- Allen, C., "Reconstructing the History of Like", Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.375~409 (1986)
- Allen, C., "Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English" (1995), Claredon Press
- Anderson, J., "A Note on Old English Impersonals", Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.167~177 (1986)
- Belletti, A., "Psych-Verbs and Theta-Theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
- Old English Impersonals and the Theory of Grammar, "Brody, M.", University College London, 262~294, pp.University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 1 (1989)
- Denison, D., "English Historical Syntax" (1993), Longman
- Fisher, O, "The Demise of the Old English Impersonal Construction", Journal of Linguistics, 19, pp.337~368 (1983)
- Van der Gaaf, W., "The Transition from the Impersonal to Personal Construction in Middle English" (1904), Winter
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" (1990), The MIT. Press
- Guidi, L., "Old English Psych Verbs and Quirky Experiencers", pp.29~48 (2011)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), The MIT
- Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol 3" (1927), Allen & Unwin
- Landau, I., "The Locative Syntax of Experiencers" (2009), The MIT. Press
- Levin, B., "English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
- Lightfoot, D., "Principles of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Mathesius, V., "A Prague School Reader in Linguistics", pp.59~67 (1928), Indiana University Press
- Matsuzaki, T., "Prominence Theory: An Approach to the Impersonal-to Personal Shift in OE and ME", Journal of Chikushi Jogakuen University and Junior College, 3, pp.27~36 (2008)
- Matthews, P., "Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics" (2007), Oxford University Press
- McCawley, N., "From OE", ME ‘Impersonal’ to ‘Personal’ Constructions: What is a ‘subject-less’ S?, 1976, pp.192~204
- Shibatani, M., "Grammatical Relations and Surface Cases", Language, 53, pp.789~809 (1977)
- Sridhar, S., "Dative Subjects and the Notion of Subject", Lingua, 49, pp.99~125 (1979)
- Takahashi, K., "Reconsideration of Li and Thompson’s (1976) Typological Theory of Language Change from the History of English", Gengo Kenkyu (Language Research), 97, pp.124~153 (1990)
- Taylor, A., "The York Toronto Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose", Oxford Text Archive, ~ (2003)
- Visser, F., "An Historical Syntax of the English Language" (1963), Brill
- Williams, E., "Argument Structure and Morphology", The Linguistic Review, 1, pp.81~114 (1981)
- Williams, E., "Grammatical Relations", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.639~673 (1984)