영어 지시사 that과 한국어 대응 표현의 절차적 의미에 관한 연구
A Study on the Procedural Meanings of English Demonstrative that and Its Corresponding Expressions in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this paper are twofold. The first purpose of this paper is to investigate the theoretical factors which contribute to the procedural meanings of English that. The second purpose is to provide the procedural meanings of its corresponding expressions in Korean, which include ‘ku’, ‘kuket’, and ‘kesiki’, and additionally the meaning differences among the expressions. The notions of joint attention, the accessibility of referents, the focus schema, etc. are argued to contribute to the procedural meanings for English that and its Korean equivalents. The difference between ‘ku’ and ‘kuket’ is compared with the notions of focus schema and the hierarchy of cognitive status. On the other hand, the differences between ‘kuket’ and ‘kesiki’ are discussed with the notion of ‘focus schema’ based on ‘definiteness’ and ‘reference’. It is argued that ‘kuket’ represents the low focus, while ‘kesiki’ the high focus.
Abstract
The purposes of this paper are twofold. The first purpose of this paper is to investigate the theoretical factors which contribute to the procedural meanings of English that. The second purpose is to provide the procedural meanings of its corresponding expressions in Korean, which include ‘ku’, ‘kuket’, and ‘kesiki’, and additionally the meaning differences among the expressions. The notions of joint attention, the accessibility of referents, the focus schema, etc. are argued to contribute to the procedural meanings for English that and its Korean equivalents. The difference between ‘ku’ and ‘kuket’ is compared with the notions of focus schema and the hierarchy of cognitive status. On the other hand, the differences between ‘kuket’ and ‘kesiki’ are discussed with the notion of ‘focus schema’ based on ‘definiteness’ and ‘reference’. It is argued that ‘kuket’ represents the low focus, while ‘kesiki’ the high focus.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김경석, "국어 3인칭 대명사 '그' : 프랑스어·영어와 비교연구", 프랑스어문교육, (34), pp.101~121 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 김영철, "우리말 담화표지의 기능 고찰−‘거시기’를 대상으로−", 한국언어문학, (52), pp.23~36 (2004), 한국언어문학회
- 민경모, "한국어 지시사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 민경모, "지시사 수식 명사구의 유형 및 특징에 대하여", 國語學, (60), pp.123~145 (2011), 국어학회
- 박근영, "‘거시기’의 문법화", 한국어 의미학, 7, pp.161~180 (2000)
- 신지연, "국어 대명사의 품사론", 한국어학, 38, pp.33~56 (2008), 한국어학회
- 전성호, "Levinon의 GCI 이론을 통한 ‘거시기’의 화용론적 분석", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.159~179 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 최인지, "근칭 지시사의 개념적․절차적 의미 연구", 언어학, 21(1), pp.155~184 (2013), 대한언어학회
- Ariel, M., "Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents" (1990), Routledge
- Botley, S., "Demonstratives in English: A Corpus-Based Study", Journal of English Linguistics, 29(1), pp.7~33 (2001)
- Cheshire, J., "That Jacksprat: An Interactional Perspective on English that", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.369~393 (1996)
- Diessel, H., "Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar", Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), pp.463~489 (2006)
- Fillmore, C., "Lectures on Deixis" (1997), CSLI Publications
- Fretheim T., "Intonation as a Constraint on Inferential Processing", Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, pp.59~64 (2002)
- Gundel, J., "Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
- Halliday, M., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Hinds, J., "Situation vs. Person Focus" (1986), Kuroshio Shuppan
- Kemmerer, D., "Near and Far in Language and Perception", Cognition, 73(1), pp.35~63 (1999)
- Lakoff, R., "Remarks on This and That", CLS, 10, pp.345~356 (1974)
- Levinson, S., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.97~121 (2004), Blackwell
- Niimura, T., "Contrastive Analysis of English and Japanese Demonstratives from the Perspectives of L1 and L2 Acquisition", Language Sciences, 18(3-4), pp.811~834 (1996)
- Scott, K., "This and That: A Procedural Analysis", Lingua, 131, pp.49~65 (2013)
- Strauss, S., "This, That, and It in Spoken American English: A Demonstrative System of Gradient Focus", Language Sciences, 24, pp.131~152 (2002)
- Talmy, L., "Topics in Cognitive Linguistics", pp.165~206 (1988), John Benjamins