본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『햄릿』 영화들과 정동

Films of Hamlet and Affect

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This essay examines, based on the concept of ‘affect,’ the possibility of different interpretations of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and its relation with the reception by the public in each modern period. Analysing three main films of Hamlet, Lawrence Olivier’s Hamlet, Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet, I will examine how the different manners on affect qualities in these films lead to different interpretation of the main theme of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, i.e. revenge. Briefly, affect can be defined as ‘force’ or ‘forces of encounter.’ From the perspective of affect, revenge is not just revenge, but it is an assembled intensity of various virtual forces. The concept of affect plays a useful compass when we think over the matter of revenge as bundled with punishment, forgiveness and justice. The qualities of the three films could be the result of affect encounters between the text and the public, and such an encounter would also contribute to actualizing virtual affects in Shakespeare’s Hamlet.

Abstract

This essay examines, based on the concept of ‘affect,’ the possibility of different interpretations of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and its relation with the reception by the public in each modern period. Analysing three main films of Hamlet, Lawrence Olivier’s Hamlet, Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet, I will examine how the different manners on affect qualities in these films lead to different interpretation of the main theme of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, i.e. revenge. Briefly, affect can be defined as ‘force’ or ‘forces of encounter.’ From the perspective of affect, revenge is not just revenge, but it is an assembled intensity of various virtual forces. The concept of affect plays a useful compass when we think over the matter of revenge as bundled with punishment, forgiveness and justice. The qualities of the three films could be the result of affect encounters between the text and the public, and such an encounter would also contribute to actualizing virtual affects in Shakespeare’s Hamlet.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김예림, "메타복수극으로 햄릿 다시 읽기", 석사, pp.2009
  2. 데리다, 자크, "마르크스의 유령들" (2007), 이제이북스
  3. 들뢰즈, 질, "비물질노동과 다중" (2005), 갈무리
  4. Ahmed, Sara, "The Affect Theory Reader", pp.29~51 (2010), Duke UP
  5. Benjamin, Walter, "Illuminations" (1973), Fontana P
  6. Bowers, Fredson, "Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587-1642" (1940), Princeton UP
  7. Crowl, Samuel, "Shakespeare at the Cineplex: The Kenneth Branagh Era" (2003), Ohio UP
  8. "Les cours de Gilles Deleuze: Spinoza"[URL]
  9. Freud, Sigmund, "The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud", pp.181~552 (1938), Random House
  10. Fudge, Erica, "Brutal Reasoning" (2006), Cornell UP
  11. Gregg, Melissa, "The Affect Theory Reader", pp.1~25 (2010), Duke UP
  12. Hamlet. Dir, "Laurence Olivier" (1948), Two Cities
  13. Hamlet. Dir, "Kenneth Branagh" (1996), Castle Rock Entertainment
  14. Tom Stoppard, "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" (1990), Farber and Farber
  15. Spinoza, Benedictus de, "Ethics and Treatise on the Correction of the Intellect" (1993), Everyman
  16. Shakespeare, William, "The Arden Shakespeare" (2006), Cengage Learning

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)