『햄릿』에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
Shakespeare’s Audience Control in Hamlet
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to reveal that Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in order to get a positive response from the audience. The playwright created the hero, Hamlet, for that purpose. Shakespeare controlled audience response by creating Hamlet who was not against the beliefs and concepts of the times. The audience favors Hamlet who is good-natured and moral and who mostly delays the revenge of his dead father. The more Hamlet delays, the more the audience favors him. Delaying is the result of ‘thought’ and his thought is the expression of his conscience. Therefore the audience liked Hamlet’s conscientiousness. This article will prove this argument by discussing how Hamlet is good-natured and moral, finally it will show why the ‘thought’ is related with Hamlet’s delay. Hamlet’s audience would at least have understood his reasons for the delay of revenge and would have understood that conscientious ones had no choice but to delay, therefore they came to understand Hamlet’s actions. The audience liked Hamlet because the audience was aware of the literary tradition of ‘thought’ that dates back to the Middle Ages and shared the beliefs and concepts of the times.
Abstract
This article aims to reveal that Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in order to get a positive response from the audience. The playwright created the hero, Hamlet, for that purpose. Shakespeare controlled audience response by creating Hamlet who was not against the beliefs and concepts of the times. The audience favors Hamlet who is good-natured and moral and who mostly delays the revenge of his dead father. The more Hamlet delays, the more the audience favors him. Delaying is the result of ‘thought’ and his thought is the expression of his conscience. Therefore the audience liked Hamlet’s conscientiousness. This article will prove this argument by discussing how Hamlet is good-natured and moral, finally it will show why the ‘thought’ is related with Hamlet’s delay. Hamlet’s audience would at least have understood his reasons for the delay of revenge and would have understood that conscientious ones had no choice but to delay, therefore they came to understand Hamlet’s actions. The audience liked Hamlet because the audience was aware of the literary tradition of ‘thought’ that dates back to the Middle Ages and shared the beliefs and concepts of the times.
참고문헌 (18)
- Belsey, Catherine, "The Case of Hamlet’s Conscience", Studies in Philology, 76, pp.127~148 (1979)
- Blincoe, Noel, "Is Gertrude an Adultress?", ANQ, 10, pp.18~24 (1997)
- Broude, Ronald, "Revenge and Revenge Tragedy in Renaissance England", Renaissance Quarterly, 28, pp.38~58 (1975)
- Campbell, Lily, "Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England", Modern Philology, 28, pp.281~296 (1931)
- De Grazia, Margreta, "Hamlet Without Hamlet" (2008), Cambridge UP
- Foley, Andrew, "Heaven or Havoc? The End of Hamlet", Shakespeare in Southern Africa, 24, pp.45~56 (2012)
- Ghose, Indira, "Jesting with Death: Hamlet in the Graveyard", Textual Practice, 24, pp.1003~1018 (2010)
- Greenfield, Sayre, "Quoting Hamlet in the Early Seventeenth Century", Modern Philology, 105, pp.510~534 (2008)
- Hoff, Linda, "Hamlet’s Choice: Hamlet-a Reformation Allegory" (1988), Edwin Mellen Press
- Honigmann, E.A.J., "Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies Revisited: the Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response" (2002), Palgrave
- Kirsch, Arthur, "Hamlet's Grief", ELH, 48, pp.17~36 (1981)
- Levine, Richard, "The Tragedy of Hamlet’s World View", College English, 23, pp.539~546 (1962)
- Moore, Peter R., "Hamlet and Piers Plowman: A Matter of Conscience", Cahiers Elisabethains, 65, pp.11~24 (2004)
- Shakespeare, William, "Ann Thomson and Neil Taylor" (2006), Cengage Learning
- Siegel, Paul, "Discerning the Ghost in Hamlet", PMLA, 78, pp.148~149 (1963)
- Skulsky, Harold, "Revenge, Honor, and Conscience in Hamlet", PMLA, 85, pp.78~87 (1970)
- Spinrad, Phoebe, "The Fall of the Sparrow and the Map of Hamlet’s Mind", Modern Philology, 102, pp.453~477 (2005)
- Terry, Reta, "Vows to the Blackest Devil: Hamlet and the Evolving Code of Honor in Early Modern England", Renaissance Quarterly, 52, pp.1070~1086 (1999)