Reconstruction of damaged parts of a Sanskrit Manuscript: focusing on the first Abhisamaya of Abhisamayālaṅkāravivṛti by Haribhadra
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how to improve Sanskrit texts using color photos of manuscripts assisted by other sources as Tibetan translation. For this, I examined the most damaged parts of the Abhisamayālaṅkāravivṛti manuscript N1— that has been used by the former editor Koei H. Amano for his edition—, namely, folios 1v and 2r, and demonstrate how the akṣaras that Amano failed to record can be reconstructed on the basis of the Tibetan translation. The detailed process of the reconstruction has been dealt in the 'Ⅱ. Reconstruction of damaged parts of the manuscript N1'In the 'Ⅲ. Reconstruction of three verses about twenty kinds of emptiness', among the contents of the missing folio of N1, I picked up three Sanskrit verses in anuṣṭubh meter, which seem to have been composed by Haribhadra on the basis of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa's explanation of twenty kinds of emptiness, and tried to restore them from the Tibetan version referring to the Sanskrit texts extracted from the two Abhisamayālaṅkāra commentaries, namely, the Vṛtti by Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa and Ālokā by Haribhadra. In the 'Ⅰ. Two manuscripts of Vivṛti', I pointed out two things that I disagree with Amano's opinions: (1) The type of the manuscript N1 is a Nepalese hooked script, not a Māghadha script. (2) The number 1500 at the colophon of N1, of which meaning is thought to be the date when the scribe finished copying by Amano, is actually used for telling how many syllables the scribe have written down so far (in this case, approximately 48,000 akṣaras).
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how to improve Sanskrit texts using color photos of manuscripts assisted by other sources as Tibetan translation. For this, I examined the most damaged parts of the Abhisamayālaṅkāravivṛti manuscript N1— that has been used by the former editor Koei H. Amano for his edition—, namely, folios 1v and 2r, and demonstrate how the akṣaras that Amano failed to record can be reconstructed on the basis of the Tibetan translation. The detailed process of the reconstruction has been dealt in the 'Ⅱ. Reconstruction of damaged parts of the manuscript N1'In the 'Ⅲ. Reconstruction of three verses about twenty kinds of emptiness', among the contents of the missing folio of N1, I picked up three Sanskrit verses in anuṣṭubh meter, which seem to have been composed by Haribhadra on the basis of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa's explanation of twenty kinds of emptiness, and tried to restore them from the Tibetan version referring to the Sanskrit texts extracted from the two Abhisamayālaṅkāra commentaries, namely, the Vṛtti by Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa and Ālokā by Haribhadra. In the 'Ⅰ. Two manuscripts of Vivṛti', I pointed out two things that I disagree with Amano's opinions: (1) The type of the manuscript N1 is a Nepalese hooked script, not a Māghadha script. (2) The number 1500 at the colophon of N1, of which meaning is thought to be the date when the scribe finished copying by Amano, is actually used for telling how many syllables the scribe have written down so far (in this case, approximately 48,000 akṣaras).
참고문헌 (14)
- Alexander T. Naugton, "Classic Mahayana Soteriology: An annotated translation of chapters 1–7 of Haribhadra’s short commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra kown as Sphuṭārtha", Shin Buddhist Comprehensive Research Institute Annual Memoirs, 9, pp.1~135 (1991)
- Amano, Koei H., "Introduction to the Māgadha script", 석사, pp.2000
- Amano, Koei H., "Abhisamayālaṃkāra–kārikā–śāstra–vivṛti: Haribhadra’s commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra–kārikā–śāstra", A Sanskrit Manuscript, ~ (2000)
- Amano, Hirofusa, "A Study on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra–kārikā–śāstra– vṛtti" (1975), Japan Science Press
- Anne MACDONALD, "Revisiting the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: Text– Critical Proposals and Problems", インド哲學仏敎學硏究, 14, pp.25~55 (2007)
- Cecil Bendall, "Catalogue of the Buddhist Sanskrit manuscripts in the University Library" (1992), Steiner
- E. Obermiller, "Analysis of the Abhisamayalamkara" (1933), Luzac ＆ Co
- James B. Apple, "Contributions to the Development and Classification of Abhisamayālam kāra Literature in Tibet from the Ninth to Fourteenth Centuries", The Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies, (5), pp.56~ (2009)
- LEE, Youngjin, "A critical edition and its translation of Abhisamayālaṅkārālokā by Haribhadra (I)–Up to Abhisamayālaṅkārakārikā verses 1 and 2 with an appendix of corresponding passages of Abhisamayālaṅkāravivṛti", Critical Review for Buddhist Studies, 12, pp.169~212 (2012)
- Louis de De la Vallée Poussin, "Bodhicaryāvatārapañjikā Volume 150 of Bibliotheca Indica" (1901), Asiatic Society of Bengal
- Martin Delhey, "The Textual Sources of the Mañjuśriyamūlakalpa (Mañjuśrīmūla–kalpa), With Special Reference to Its Early Nepalese Witness NGMPP A 39", 4, pp.ⅩⅥ, 55~75
- Nagao, Gadjin, "Madhyāntavibhāga–bhāṣya A Buddhist Philosophical Treatise edited for the first time from a Sanskrit manuscript" (1964), Suzuki Research Foundation
- P.L. Vaidya, "Divyāvadāna Buddhist Sanskrit texts 20" (1959), Mithila Institute of Post–graduate Studies and Research in Sanskrit Learning
- Rāmaśaṅkara Tripāṭhī, "Prajñāpāramitopadeśaśāstre Abhisamayālaṅkaravṛttiḥ Sphuṭārthā Volume 2 of Bibliotheca Indo–Tibetica series" (1993), Kendrīya Ucca Tibbatī–Śikṣā–Saṃsthāna