On Two Sanskrit Manuscripts of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa's Commentary on the Abhisamayālaṅkāra
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper deals with two issues in Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary on the Abhisamayālaṅkāra[kārikā], one being a corrupt sentence in Prakrit and the other relating to the title of the commentary by Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa. In this research, I have consulted two Sanskrit manuscripts preserved in Nepal and Tibet, which are referred to as ms A and ms B by me as well as a newly identified manuscript, which is scattered into two sets in NGMPP. In the second chapter, I revised a corrupt Prakrit sentence into “tathāgato tti vattavvo ṇo tu vattavvo sammāsaṃbuddhaḥ” (He should be called tathāgata, but not saṃyaksambuddha, a perfectly enlightened one.) in both the manuscripts. This mistranslation was due to the scribes’s limited knowledge of Prakrit. I also tried to figure out why Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa quotes this Prakrit sentence, in which tathāgata is unusually differentiated from saṃyaksambuddha, especially when we consider that the quotation, presumably from the Mahāsāṃghikas, does not match the description of the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā, on which Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa is commenting. The third section mainly deals with confusion relating to the title of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary. In the colophons of ms A, the text, commonly called Abhisamayālaṃkāravṛtti, is titled, “Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāryaprajñāpāramitopadeśam Abhisamayālaṃkāraśāstraṃ. This is the same title that the manuscript(s) of kārikās has. Moreover, there is a description, “Śrīpañcaviṃśtisāhasrikāyāḥ Prajñāpāyamitāyāḥ ․ ĀryaVimuktisenakṛteyaṃ ṭīkā sunirmalā” on the first recto of the newly identified manuscript of the kārikās. Both of these examples tell us that the kārikās and the commentary were composed by the same person, Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa. In conclusion of this chapter, I put forward reasons for the confusion and suggest that the title of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary is to be reconsided.
Abstract
This paper deals with two issues in Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary on the Abhisamayālaṅkāra[kārikā], one being a corrupt sentence in Prakrit and the other relating to the title of the commentary by Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa. In this research, I have consulted two Sanskrit manuscripts preserved in Nepal and Tibet, which are referred to as ms A and ms B by me as well as a newly identified manuscript, which is scattered into two sets in NGMPP. In the second chapter, I revised a corrupt Prakrit sentence into “tathāgato tti vattavvo ṇo tu vattavvo sammāsaṃbuddhaḥ” (He should be called tathāgata, but not saṃyaksambuddha, a perfectly enlightened one.) in both the manuscripts. This mistranslation was due to the scribes’s limited knowledge of Prakrit. I also tried to figure out why Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa quotes this Prakrit sentence, in which tathāgata is unusually differentiated from saṃyaksambuddha, especially when we consider that the quotation, presumably from the Mahāsāṃghikas, does not match the description of the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā, on which Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa is commenting. The third section mainly deals with confusion relating to the title of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary. In the colophons of ms A, the text, commonly called Abhisamayālaṃkāravṛtti, is titled, “Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāryaprajñāpāramitopadeśam Abhisamayālaṃkāraśāstraṃ. This is the same title that the manuscript(s) of kārikās has. Moreover, there is a description, “Śrīpañcaviṃśtisāhasrikāyāḥ Prajñāpāyamitāyāḥ ․ ĀryaVimuktisenakṛteyaṃ ṭīkā sunirmalā” on the first recto of the newly identified manuscript of the kārikās. Both of these examples tell us that the kārikās and the commentary were composed by the same person, Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa. In conclusion of this chapter, I put forward reasons for the confusion and suggest that the title of Ārya Vimuktiṣeṇa’s commentary is to be reconsided.
참고문헌 (27)
- Apple, James, "Contributions to the development and classification of the Abhisamayālaṃkāra literature in Tibet from the ninth to fourteenth centuries", Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies, 5, pp.1~57 (2009)
- Apple, James, "Stairway to Nirvāṇa: A Study of the Twenty Saṃghas Based on the Works of Tsong Kha Pa" (2008), State University of New York Press
- Bareau, André., "Les sectes bouddhiques du Petit Véhicule(Vol. 38). École française d'Extrême-Orient" (1955), École française d'Extrême-Orient
- Baruah, Bibhuti, "Buddhist sects and sectarianism" (2000), Sarup & Sons
- 차상엽, "옥 로덴쎄랍의 보성론요의 여래장품" (2013), 씨아이알
- Bhattacharya, Gouriswar, "From Turfan to Ajanta: Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday", pp.35~49 (2010), Lumbini International Research Institute
- Hu-von Hinüber, Haiyan., "Jaina- Itihāsa-Ratna: Festschrift für Gustav Roth zum 90", pp.295~335 (2006), Indica et Tibetica Verlag
- Āryāsaṅga, together with its Commentary (Bhāṣya) by Vasubandhu, "The Universal Vehicle Discourse Literature (Mahāyānasūtrālaṁkāra): by Maitreyanātha", pp.2004, Jamspal, L
- Karashima, Seishi, "Who Composed the Mahāyāna Scriptures? — The Mahāsāṃghikas and Vaitulya Scriptures", Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, 18, pp.113~162 (2014)
- 김성철, "≪유가사 지론≫에서 궁극적 실재를 보는자", 구산논집, 9, pp.73~93 (2004)
- Kouda, Ryōshū, "Study Group on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature", pp.91~112 (2004), Taisho University Press
- Kramer, Ralf., "Collectanea Himalayica: Studies on the History and Culture of the Himalayas and Tibet 1" (2007), Indus Verlag
- 이영진, "새로 확인된 『현관장엄론』 게송사본과 아리야 비묵띠세나의 『현관장엄론』 주석서 콜로폰", 불교학연구, 43, pp.217~243 (2015), 불교학연구회
- Li, Xuezhu, "Diplomatic Transcription of the Sanskrit Manuscript of the Munimatālaṃkāra-Chapter 1: Fols. 1v1-3v5", China Tibetology, 1, pp.1~11 (2013)
- Makransky, John J., "Buddhahood Embodied" (1997), Sri Satguru Publications
- Matsuda, K., "Two Sanskrit Manuscripts of the Daśabhūmikasūtra Preserved at the National Archives, Kathmandu (Vol. 10)" (1996), Centre for East Asian Cultural Studies for Unesco
- Nakamura, Hodo., "Ārya-Vimuktisena’s Abhisamayālaṃkāravṛtti the Earliest Commentary on the Abhisamayā-laṃkāra", 박사, pp.2014
- Nakamura, Hodo., "Traditions of the Commentaries Ascribed to Asaṅga and Vasubandhu on the Abhisamayālaṃ-kāra: Relationship with the Commentaries ascribed to Daṃṣṭrasena on the Prajñāpāramitā-literature", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 59(3), pp.188~192 (2011)
- Obermiller, E., "Abhisamayālaṅkāra-Prajñāpāramitā-Upadeśa-Śāstra: The Work of Bodhisattva Maitreya" (1929), Leningrad
- Pensa, Corrado., "L'Abhisamayālaṃkāravṛtti di Ārya-Vimuktisena Primo Abhisamaya" (1967), L'Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente
- Pischel, R., "Comparative grammar of the Prākṛit languages. Translated by Subhadra Jhā" (1965), Motilal Banarsidass
- Roth, Gustav., "Bhikṣuṇī-vinaya: including Bhikṣuṇī-Prakīrṇaka and a summary of the Bhikṣu-Prakīrṇaka of the Ārya-Mahāsāṃghika- Lokottaravādin" (1970), KP Jayaswal Research Institute
- Saerji., "From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research", pp.291~300 (2014), ÖAW
- Sferra, Francesco., "Manuscripta Buddhica 1: Sanskrit Texts from Giuseppe Tucci's Collection Part 1", pp.15~78 (2008), Istituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente
- Skilling, Peter, "The Bodhisattva Ideal: Essays on the Emergence of the Mahayana", pp.69~162 (2013), the Buddhist Publication Society
- Sparham, Gareth., "Abhisamayālaṃkāra with Vr̥tti and Ālokā First Abhisamaya" (2006), Jain publishing company
- Woolner, A. C., "Introduction to Prakrit" (1917), University of the Panjab Lahore